<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google - Wolfram Alpha – Bing : What Is The Next Big Thing?</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Introspective</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1325100</link>
		<dc:creator>Introspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1325100</guid>
		<description>I like Wolfram Alpha. It offers a completely new way of searching for information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Wolfram Alpha. It offers a completely new way of searching for information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biz</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1290926</link>
		<dc:creator>Biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1290926</guid>
		<description>Wolfram Alpha is a good news in the area of search engines. It has some advantages compared to the other search engines. Still, it is not the competition to Google or other search engines, since it uses totally different approach. It is more like dictionary or encyclopedia than search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfram Alpha is a good news in the area of search engines. It has some advantages compared to the other search engines. Still, it is not the competition to Google or other search engines, since it uses totally different approach. It is more like dictionary or encyclopedia than search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1276371</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1276371</guid>
		<description>Bing offers much better results than Google at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing offers much better results than Google at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George St John</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1266513</link>
		<dc:creator>George St John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1266513</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see who wins the battle between these giants. Whoever gets placement on the browser window, where most searches originate, could be a deciding factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see who wins the battle between these giants. Whoever gets placement on the browser window, where most searches originate, could be a deciding factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing! First Impressions – Part 1 - Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1263010</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing! First Impressions – Part 1 - Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 18:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/121062#comment-1263010</guid>
		<description>[...] Just a Rebranding Exercise Many experts in the field of search with write off Bing without even trying it, claiming it’s just MSN Search Live Search in yet another fancy new package. Those people would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Just a Rebranding Exercise Many experts in the field of search with write off Bing without even trying it, claiming it’s just MSN Search Live Search in yet another fancy new package. Those people would [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
