Comments on: Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: DNA Causes Geneticists, Other Scientists, Join Ranks of Dissenters

By: bmich67

bmich67 — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:34:21 +0000

can the 2 theory s be right

By: thecause

thecause — Tue, 12 May 2009 04:20:15 +0000

Marcel,

You are wrong. Evolution is not a law. Please support your claim.

By: Anthony

Anthony — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:47:15 +0000

Let us put something into perspective for those who want to express about those 700 dissenters. There is this thing that is called Project Steve. As of 3/26/09 there are 1080 scientist named Steve who “affirm the validity of the theory of evolution.”

What is most bothering is you may have 700 Christian scientist breaking the 9th Commandment.

“Yet, some in the anthropological field of science are not willing to accept the current DNA findings as proof that modern humans did not “evolve” from Neanderthals.” — No scientist accepts that modern human evolved from Neanderthals. No where in the scientific literate is this mentioned. Creationist should stop making things up. Many Christians have become Atheists because people like Creationist morality.

By: Nancy Reyes

Nancy Reyes — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:22:30 +0000

Most of the Darwin discussions know little about science and less about philosophy.

science discusses how something works…philosophy discusses why something works.

By: marcel

marcel — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:32:17 +0000

Nice article. But evolution is no longer a theory, but a scientific law, similar in acceptance to the law of gravity. Sure there are quacks out there who have a problem with science in areas where science tends to disprove religion. But evolution is a fact. The human species is also way more than 6,000 years old, by the way. This too is a fact, and not a theory.

Have a nice day.

By: mondoreb

mondoreb — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:58:45 +0000

yeaton2, mohamed, Darwiniana:

Thanks all for the comments.

Bobxxx:

It’s always surprising to me how many people fiercely defend an unproven idea (that’s why it’s called a Theory) with all the zeal of a religious missionary.

Many times, it’s not about the science or the evidence which turns up: it’s about “how I feel about it”.

Thanks for the comment.

By: yeaton2

yeaton2 — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:10:35 +0000

I think that the coment: “With the advent of advanced DNA testing relating to the origin of humans, you’d think geneticists, biochemists, and other scientists, such as molecular biologists, bacteriologists, geophysicists, and microbiologists would trumpet recent DNA findings as additional proof of Darwin’s theory of evolution.” Says a lot. 700 in a minescule number of scienentists especially if you consider that most of them are specialists in evolution. The overwhelming majority of scientist do see the evidence as growing.

Suggesting that this some trend created by genetic science is very misleading (intentional or not).

By: mohamed

mohamed — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:18:06 +0000

i belive with darwin theory

By: Bobxxxx

Bobxxxx — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:13:06 +0000

What bullshit. Take your 700 fake scientists and shove it.

By: Darwiniana » Darwinism was an interesting idea in the 19th century

Darwiniana » Darwinism was an interesting idea in the 19th century — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:00:28 +0000

[…] Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: DNA Causes Geneticists, Other Scientists, Join Ranks of Dissenters Posted on April 6th, 2009 Geneticists, Other Scientists, Join Ranks of Darwin Dissenters The “end” of evolution as we know it? With the advent of advanced DNA testing relating to the origin of humans, you’d think geneticists, biochemists, and other scientists, such as molecular biologists, bacteriologists, geophysicists, and microbiologists would trumpet recent DNA findings as additional proof of Darwin’s theory of evolution. Yet we’ve found where a growing number of these types of scientists have come forward to dispute Darwin’s Theory of Evolution on the site: A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, where over 700 scientists and researchers have signed their name. […]