<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The latest bit of bright-eyed optimism about IQ</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristoff, IQ and immigration &#171; Immigration Watch International</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1284928</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristoff, IQ and immigration &#171; Immigration Watch International</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1284928</guid>
		<description>[...] just a rehash of points that I have rebutted already in my previous commentaries on Nisbett. See here, here, here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] just a rehash of points that I have rebutted already in my previous commentaries on Nisbett. See here, here, here and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mediaman</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1197205</link>
		<dc:creator>Mediaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1197205</guid>
		<description>Does being a converted Jew make me more intelligent? Does my mixed ancestry offer more opportunity for "spontaneous upgrades" in IQ?
Does coming from one supportive parent in self-education, while the other was the emotive, and intellectual opposite offer any information? Certainly pheronomes played more a part in their mutual attraction than did intellectual measurement of potential offspring.
My point is that if Da Vinci could be a genius in 16th century Venice, as could others of that age and in the past, what makes anyone think that the same thing isn't happening today?
If IQ solely were the measurement of success we'd have a lot of rich genius'. We don't. In fact, it is more likely that everyday Joe is more focused, less cerebral, more persistent and less distracted, and that makes him enjoy more success.
Everyday Joe is more likely to practically apply the genius discovered by others than the genius themselves.
Sometimes the joy in intellect is when it manifests in discovery, in insight, soon followed by the guy who brings it to market. The joy part? Knowing you were right.
Genius is NOT it's own reward, more a curse.
Awareness of self leads to hyper-critical analysis, not necessarily leading to improvement, more to depression and regret.
The evolution of society is an IQ feedback loop, forcing ever faster evolutionary acceleration of societal IQ. Which also highlights one of natire's and evolution's dichotomies; natural selection opts for survival characteristis, predator characteristics mostly. Intellectual improvement isn't a primary survival characteristic...yet. Which is why evolution has allowed so many species mistakes, dead ends. If survival is first, then inclination towards reproduction is at the top of the list, immediately after self-survial. After survial needs, staying alive, the intellectual component of cooking genius is pretty far down the list.
Pretty soon, today's genius will be tomorrow's challenged.
If we last that long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does being a converted Jew make me more intelligent? Does my mixed ancestry offer more opportunity for &#8220;spontaneous upgrades&#8221; in IQ?<br />
Does coming from one supportive parent in self-education, while the other was the emotive, and intellectual opposite offer any information? Certainly pheronomes played more a part in their mutual attraction than did intellectual measurement of potential offspring.<br />
My point is that if Da Vinci could be a genius in 16th century Venice, as could others of that age and in the past, what makes anyone think that the same thing isn&#8217;t happening today?<br />
If IQ solely were the measurement of success we&#8217;d have a lot of rich genius&#8217;. We don&#8217;t. In fact, it is more likely that everyday Joe is more focused, less cerebral, more persistent and less distracted, and that makes him enjoy more success.<br />
Everyday Joe is more likely to practically apply the genius discovered by others than the genius themselves.<br />
Sometimes the joy in intellect is when it manifests in discovery, in insight, soon followed by the guy who brings it to market. The joy part? Knowing you were right.<br />
Genius is NOT it&#8217;s own reward, more a curse.<br />
Awareness of self leads to hyper-critical analysis, not necessarily leading to improvement, more to depression and regret.<br />
The evolution of society is an IQ feedback loop, forcing ever faster evolutionary acceleration of societal IQ. Which also highlights one of natire&#8217;s and evolution&#8217;s dichotomies; natural selection opts for survival characteristis, predator characteristics mostly. Intellectual improvement isn&#8217;t a primary survival characteristic&#8230;yet. Which is why evolution has allowed so many species mistakes, dead ends. If survival is first, then inclination towards reproduction is at the top of the list, immediately after self-survial. After survial needs, staying alive, the intellectual component of cooking genius is pretty far down the list.<br />
Pretty soon, today&#8217;s genius will be tomorrow&#8217;s challenged.<br />
If we last that long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left wing skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1186281</link>
		<dc:creator>Left wing skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 19:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1186281</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Jews are so productive no solely because of their superior IQ's but, because it's not in their culture to sit around and feel smug about how they are inalterably superior to black people, Latinos, and so on.  

There's is something so pathetic about all this trash talking back to Nisbett's honest attempt to understand the potential of nurture.  Makes me want to vomit when I think of people like steve sailer who just sits around hating black people, selectively attending to data that support his case for their inferiority.   Now there's a drag on society!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Jews are so productive no solely because of their superior IQ&#8217;s but, because it&#8217;s not in their culture to sit around and feel smug about how they are inalterably superior to black people, Latinos, and so on.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s is something so pathetic about all this trash talking back to Nisbett&#8217;s honest attempt to understand the potential of nurture.  Makes me want to vomit when I think of people like steve sailer who just sits around hating black people, selectively attending to data that support his case for their inferiority.   Now there&#8217;s a drag on society!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreySwan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1104604</link>
		<dc:creator>GreySwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1104604</guid>
		<description>Jews had Einstein, they have written the majority of musicals, and they have developed hollywood into the best film industry in the country. They have one ~20% of global Nobel prizes. The are 20% of the professors at top institutions. They are highly represented in all top professions and trade. And they pay a disproportionate share (per capita) of taxes. Having Jews in your country makes you richer. A quick search online will reveal that many of the medical and technical advances of this century have been made by Jews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jews had Einstein, they have written the majority of musicals, and they have developed hollywood into the best film industry in the country. They have one ~20% of global Nobel prizes. The are 20% of the professors at top institutions. They are highly represented in all top professions and trade. And they pay a disproportionate share (per capita) of taxes. Having Jews in your country makes you richer. A quick search online will reveal that many of the medical and technical advances of this century have been made by Jews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barack</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1099569</link>
		<dc:creator>Barack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1099569</guid>
		<description>Since Charles Murray was married to an Asian woman with whom he had two children, he is not doing such a good job of maintaining white purity, George.  Hint:  When you leave a comment, try to put some thought and actual knowledge into it so as not to look like a typically indoctrinated mediocrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Charles Murray was married to an Asian woman with whom he had two children, he is not doing such a good job of maintaining white purity, George.  Hint:  When you leave a comment, try to put some thought and actual knowledge into it so as not to look like a typically indoctrinated mediocrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1095104</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 05:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1095104</guid>
		<description>The best way to guarantee success is for Asians to marry whites. Hapas are in general smarter than any other group in the world. However dont expect Murray to support this as his goal is to maintain white purity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way to guarantee success is for Asians to marry whites. Hapas are in general smarter than any other group in the world. However dont expect Murray to support this as his goal is to maintain white purity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankJohnson</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1086307</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/120255#comment-1086307</guid>
		<description>I don’t know . . . I’d take these discussions of Jewish intellectual superiority more seriously if Jewish contributions to world culture weren’t such cock-ups: communism, Freudian analysis, the bomb, Ayn Rand, and, more recently, the Project for a New American Century and Credit Default Swaps.  When will the Jews harness all this intellectual firepower and give us something cool, like Rock and Roll, or gummi bears?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know . . . I’d take these discussions of Jewish intellectual superiority more seriously if Jewish contributions to world culture weren’t such cock-ups: communism, Freudian analysis, the bomb, Ayn Rand, and, more recently, the Project for a New American Century and Credit Default Swaps.  When will the Jews harness all this intellectual firepower and give us something cool, like Rock and Roll, or gummi bears?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

