http://www.bloggernews.net/119056 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:45:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.bloggernews.net/119056#comment-836428 peterhaven Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:39:56 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/119056#comment-836428 It is worth noting that no jury ever concluded that Simpson was "innocent." The criminal jury found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The civil jury found that guilt was proven by clear and convincing evidence. Presumably, clear and convincing was slightly less than reasonable doubt. But the overall conclusion was one of guilt. It is worth noting that no jury ever concluded that Simpson was “innocent.” The criminal jury found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The civil jury found that guilt was proven by clear and convincing evidence. Presumably, clear and convincing was slightly less than reasonable doubt. But the overall conclusion was one of guilt.

]]> http://www.bloggernews.net/119056#comment-833583 mytwocents-The Original Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:11:02 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/119056#comment-833583 Right back atcha' A. Prien! What kind of person are you who thinks OJ did not murder his ex-wife and Ron Goldman? The kind who thinks that juries NEVER make mistakes? Or are you prejudiced but in a "backwards" kind of way? Right back atcha’ A. Prien! What kind of person are you who thinks OJ did not murder his ex-wife and Ron Goldman? The kind who thinks that juries NEVER make mistakes? Or are you prejudiced but in a “backwards” kind of way?

]]> http://www.bloggernews.net/119056#comment-831801 A. Prien Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:14:29 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/119056#comment-831801 There are only two types of people who imagine Simpson had anything to do with the murder case. The first are those who know nothing about the details of the evidence that prove the entire case is a complete fraud; the second are the congenitally prejudiced who are more determiend to ignore the evidence than the most prejudiced juror in "Twelve Angry Men." So if you imgagine Simpson did it, which group do you belong to? There are only two types of people who imagine Simpson had anything to do with the murder case. The first are those who know nothing about the details of the evidence that prove the entire case is a complete fraud; the second are the congenitally prejudiced who are more determiend to ignore the evidence than the most prejudiced juror in “Twelve Angry Men.” So if you imgagine Simpson did it, which group do you belong to?

]]>