<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Media Tanked</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118715</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnB</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118715#comment-779726</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/118715#comment-779726</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to reply. 

I agree with your sentiments and evaluation of the press and the candidates.  The worse thing for our democracy isn't the election of one man over the other, but that the media now controls our democratic process.  

We can survive bad economic times and bad presidents, but we cannot survive a silent, craven media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to reply. </p>
<p>I agree with your sentiments and evaluation of the press and the candidates.  The worse thing for our democracy isn&#8217;t the election of one man over the other, but that the media now controls our democratic process.  </p>
<p>We can survive bad economic times and bad presidents, but we cannot survive a silent, craven media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama is a BIG ?</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118715#comment-779461</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama is a BIG ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/118715#comment-779461</guid>
		<description>The New York Times has definitely abandoned it's journalistic integrity and gone completely in the tank for Barack Obama ... But, they aren't the only ones !!! CNN, Jack Cafferty, MSNBC, the Los Angeles Times,
John Stewart, Colbert, the View, most of Hollywood, the anchors who went overseas with Obama ... Just to mention a few!!! And, what's even worse is that they no longer publish, or report opposing views!! And, they have denied those they accuse from having a platform from which to respond. To half of America, it's inconceivable that the media would not only do this ... But, that they'd back an empty suit, with over 20 years of anti-American, racist associations, while trashing an American hero with 42 years of service to our country!!

 When I was a kid, I admired the press, which always fought for truth. Now, it's like living in a totalitarian state, where one side controls biased information to the people. To Hollywood and the media ... Joseph Goebbels would be proud !!!

"The public cannot be too curious concerning the characters of public men." —Samuel Adams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times has definitely abandoned it&#8217;s journalistic integrity and gone completely in the tank for Barack Obama &#8230; But, they aren&#8217;t the only ones !!! CNN, Jack Cafferty, MSNBC, the Los Angeles Times,<br />
John Stewart, Colbert, the View, most of Hollywood, the anchors who went overseas with Obama &#8230; Just to mention a few!!! And, what&#8217;s even worse is that they no longer publish, or report opposing views!! And, they have denied those they accuse from having a platform from which to respond. To half of America, it&#8217;s inconceivable that the media would not only do this &#8230; But, that they&#8217;d back an empty suit, with over 20 years of anti-American, racist associations, while trashing an American hero with 42 years of service to our country!!</p>
<p> When I was a kid, I admired the press, which always fought for truth. Now, it&#8217;s like living in a totalitarian state, where one side controls biased information to the people. To Hollywood and the media &#8230; Joseph Goebbels would be proud !!!</p>
<p>&#8220;The public cannot be too curious concerning the characters of public men.&#8221; —Samuel Adams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
