<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Creeping Socialism of Barack Obama, Part II</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Yu-Jen Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-1027289</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Yu-Jen Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-1027289</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Barack Obama:

Barack Obama is a racial-minority individual, and in his heart and mind he inevitably does not endorse hate crimes committed by George W. Bush.
 
George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).
 
George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.

Many people know what Bush did.

And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.

Bush was absolute evil.

Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

Bush is a psychological prisoner.

Bush has a lot to worry about.

Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

“GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
______________________
I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Barack Obama:</p>
<p>Barack Obama is a racial-minority individual, and in his heart and mind he inevitably does not endorse hate crimes committed by George W. Bush.</p>
<p>George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).</p>
<p>George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.</p>
<p>And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.</p>
<p>Many people know what Bush did.</p>
<p>And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.</p>
<p>Bush was absolute evil.</p>
<p>Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.</p>
<p>Bush is a psychological prisoner.</p>
<p>Bush has a lot to worry about.</p>
<p>Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.</p>
<p>In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.</p>
<p>Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang<br />
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996<br />
Messiah College, Grantham, PA<br />
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993</p>
<p>“GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG<br />
______________________<br />
I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SandRider</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-801851</link>
		<dc:creator>SandRider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-801851</guid>
		<description>Wow, Flash.  I've read some seriously silly things on this site, but you're amazing.  What's your username on Stormfront ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Flash.  I&#8217;ve read some seriously silly things on this site, but you&#8217;re amazing.  What&#8217;s your username on Stormfront ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flash</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-748838</link>
		<dc:creator>Flash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-748838</guid>
		<description>"Putting a heavier tax burden on the rich" does not make any sense whatsoever!  People, rich or poor, decide for themselves which route they will take.  Rich people are the ones who've been willing to work for what they've earned and make wise investments.  As far as the "ones who struggle," it should be their own responsibility to work to improve themselves.  For too long the so-called "struggling" have been given a free ride, free welfare to do absolutely nothing other than having sex and producing more kids.  These same moms do not have to worry about paying medical expenses; it is all taken care of by Medicaid and other federal programs.  This entire society has for too long been an enabler of those too useless to try to earn a decent living.  They'd rather produce herds of kids to increase the amount of welfare benefits.  These same kids are the ones, whether they know the alphabet or can count to ten, are the ones who get free scholarships.  Our tax dollars build the "affordable" housing for the minorities who, in turn, blame the working people.  They "are not treated equally," and that is absolutely the most accurate statement we have heard.  They are correct.  They are NOT treated equally.  The wealther and middle class people must work for a living and take care of their children rather than being welfare scavengers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Putting a heavier tax burden on the rich&#8221; does not make any sense whatsoever!  People, rich or poor, decide for themselves which route they will take.  Rich people are the ones who&#8217;ve been willing to work for what they&#8217;ve earned and make wise investments.  As far as the &#8220;ones who struggle,&#8221; it should be their own responsibility to work to improve themselves.  For too long the so-called &#8220;struggling&#8221; have been given a free ride, free welfare to do absolutely nothing other than having sex and producing more kids.  These same moms do not have to worry about paying medical expenses; it is all taken care of by Medicaid and other federal programs.  This entire society has for too long been an enabler of those too useless to try to earn a decent living.  They&#8217;d rather produce herds of kids to increase the amount of welfare benefits.  These same kids are the ones, whether they know the alphabet or can count to ten, are the ones who get free scholarships.  Our tax dollars build the &#8220;affordable&#8221; housing for the minorities who, in turn, blame the working people.  They &#8220;are not treated equally,&#8221; and that is absolutely the most accurate statement we have heard.  They are correct.  They are NOT treated equally.  The wealther and middle class people must work for a living and take care of their children rather than being welfare scavengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bump0naPickle</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-744555</link>
		<dc:creator>Bump0naPickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-744555</guid>
		<description>WOW great article..I did not vote because well Jesus is my king..and I didnt like my choices...so good article I loved it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW great article..I did not vote because well Jesus is my king..and I didnt like my choices&#8230;so good article I loved it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-744461</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-744461</guid>
		<description>Socialism is defined as government control over the means of production and financial system. How can this be "high-quality English language analysis" when you distort the meaning a word just because it has a negative connotation in the eyes of your devout readers and thereby distorts the truth and pushes your preconceived agenda?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socialism is defined as government control over the means of production and financial system. How can this be &#8220;high-quality English language analysis&#8221; when you distort the meaning a word just because it has a negative connotation in the eyes of your devout readers and thereby distorts the truth and pushes your preconceived agenda?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
