http://www.bloggernews.net/118516 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:59:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-801851 SandRider Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:51:40 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-801851 Wow, Flash. I've read some seriously silly things on this site, but you're amazing. What's your username on Stormfront ? Wow, Flash. I’ve read some seriously silly things on this site, but you’re amazing. What’s your username on Stormfront ?

]]> http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-748838 Flash Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:21:12 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-748838 "Putting a heavier tax burden on the rich" does not make any sense whatsoever! People, rich or poor, decide for themselves which route they will take. Rich people are the ones who've been willing to work for what they've earned and make wise investments. As far as the "ones who struggle," it should be their own responsibility to work to improve themselves. For too long the so-called "struggling" have been given a free ride, free welfare to do absolutely nothing other than having sex and producing more kids. These same moms do not have to worry about paying medical expenses; it is all taken care of by Medicaid and other federal programs. This entire society has for too long been an enabler of those too useless to try to earn a decent living. They'd rather produce herds of kids to increase the amount of welfare benefits. These same kids are the ones, whether they know the alphabet or can count to ten, are the ones who get free scholarships. Our tax dollars build the "affordable" housing for the minorities who, in turn, blame the working people. They "are not treated equally," and that is absolutely the most accurate statement we have heard. They are correct. They are NOT treated equally. The wealther and middle class people must work for a living and take care of their children rather than being welfare scavengers. “Putting a heavier tax burden on the rich” does not make any sense whatsoever! People, rich or poor, decide for themselves which route they will take. Rich people are the ones who’ve been willing to work for what they’ve earned and make wise investments. As far as the “ones who struggle,” it should be their own responsibility to work to improve themselves. For too long the so-called “struggling” have been given a free ride, free welfare to do absolutely nothing other than having sex and producing more kids. These same moms do not have to worry about paying medical expenses; it is all taken care of by Medicaid and other federal programs. This entire society has for too long been an enabler of those too useless to try to earn a decent living. They’d rather produce herds of kids to increase the amount of welfare benefits. These same kids are the ones, whether they know the alphabet or can count to ten, are the ones who get free scholarships. Our tax dollars build the “affordable” housing for the minorities who, in turn, blame the working people. They “are not treated equally,” and that is absolutely the most accurate statement we have heard. They are correct. They are NOT treated equally. The wealther and middle class people must work for a living and take care of their children rather than being welfare scavengers.

]]> http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-744555 Bump0naPickle Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:23:57 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-744555 WOW great article..I did not vote because well Jesus is my king..and I didnt like my choices...so good article I loved it... WOW great article..I did not vote because well Jesus is my king..and I didnt like my choices…so good article I loved it…

]]> http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-744461 joe Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:53:48 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/118516#comment-744461 Socialism is defined as government control over the means of production and financial system. How can this be "high-quality English language analysis" when you distort the meaning a word just because it has a negative connotation in the eyes of your devout readers and thereby distorts the truth and pushes your preconceived agenda? Socialism is defined as government control over the means of production and financial system. How can this be “high-quality English language analysis” when you distort the meaning a word just because it has a negative connotation in the eyes of your devout readers and thereby distorts the truth and pushes your preconceived agenda?

]]>