Also, isn’t it “gaffes”, not “gaffs”?

St. Thomas University (Ranked 182nd in a field of 185 law schools).

To wit, the LSAT score of the ‘brightest’ student in Baez’s class would fail to ‘make the cut’ at some 151 of the 185 law schools ranked by the Internet Legal Research Group.

It is interesting to note that Baez makes no mention of his less-than-distinguished alma mater on his website.

(To acknowledge such a thing would no doubt take the ’shine’ right off of the ridiculous faux ‘coat of arms’ he has chosen for his one-man firm)

To be fair, I am willing to believe that Baez’s alma mater has produced some fine lawyers, however, it is clear that Baez is not one of them.

Indeed, until I witnessed Baez in action, I had assumed that there was no such thing as an inarticulate lawyer.

Regardless of whether Baez is speaking or writing, he appears to have the vocabulary of the average 12 year-old, but without benefit of the average 12 year-old’s understanding of grammar!

Worse still, Baez looks at least as uncertain, hesitant, inexperienced & uneducated as a nervous 2nd year law student appearing in a court of law for the first time as a volunteer with their school’s legal clinic.

(Crying, “Not fair!” in the course of a court proceeding is proof that Baez is not only woefully uneducated and unprofessional, but so lacking in basic intelligence that ‘common sense’ can elude him - even the most casual TV viewers, deluged as they are in ‘Law & Order’ reruns and ads for Court TV, could probably surmise that this particular childhood refrain has no place
in a court of law!)

The fact that 8 years elapsed between the time Baez finished law school and the date he first wrote the bar exam is not the only curious aspect of his dubious standing as a lawyer.

The fact that he has misrepresented his legal experience by listing the outcomes of cases he was involved with AS A STUDENT with his school’s legal clinic (where a student’s work is closely supervised by review counsel, and often involves little more than putting on a suit and observing experienced lawyers ‘do their thing’) is beneath contempt.

If such deceit is not grounds for disbarment in Florida, it ought to be!

Alas, the sooner Baez can be marginalized in this case (for example, via court appointed counsel), the better.

Indeed, it would be a terrible miscarriage of justice to allow the monstrous Casey Anthony to avail herself of the patently foreseeable ‘ineffective counsel’ claims that lie in almost every move that Baez makes (e.g. hiring incompetent, fly-by-night PR ‘firm’ that undermines his client on CNN) or fails to make (e.g. motion for speedy trial).

Give it up Baez! Even lowly St. Thomas law school grads are smart enough to see right through YOU and that tacky ‘coat of arms’ you lifted from the internet! (Apparently, your grasp of IP law is even weaker than your ‘knowledge’ of criminal law & procedure!)

Caylee Anthony, Is She Alive

Oct. 17

Jan Barrett

Title: Caylee Anthony: Is She Alive As Family Says Or Are They in Denial

Todd Black said in today’s news release that he “has never said that Caylee Anthony is deceased, and those who were professional enough to obtain the October 14th interview, in its entirety, reported fairly and truthfully. The rest of the media must have been drinking too much Palmetto Bug Punch.”

Palmetto Bug Punch - is that the best he can do to counterract the Casey Koolaid line? This guy is committing career suicide!

When my daughter was a teenager and she came home with some crazy story blaming her teacher for something, I never said I believed her or didnt. I told her that she might be innocent but that she needed to manage the perception because there had to be a reason her teacher might believe she was not.

In his fantasy world the jails would be empty and the innocent public would be subject daily to tens of thousands of repeated robberies, rapes, murders and worse every day on the open street! Because chances are - in that fantasy world, anyway - the perps are innocent!” LOL!

I totally agree. Many parents who love their children (most inherently do), would die, lie, steal and protect within reason.

LIE 1.A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood. 2.Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.

With that definition presented, Cindy giving the impression that others are responsible for her granddaughter borders on a false witness, deceitful, and hinders the investigation (i.e. smells like a dead body and later smells like rotten pizza).

I wish we could protect little kids better.

But even if some people don’t have a conscience or the ability to care about others they are certainly accountable for their actions and behavior. To insist on anything less is not fair to them or to society.

I think Cindy made excuses for and bailed Casey out of things she should have had consquences for doing. She may have done it out of denial or exhaustion, I don’t know. But I think it certainly ended up helping to contribute to this whole sorry mess.

It’s an example and a lesson for us all.

i know. China gives inmates bread or riceballs with water if there lucky. No T.V. no workout room, no library, no baths, soaps, toothpaste, or commissary to buy chewing gum.

Question to all:

Do you think Casey, not judging mind you, has a conscience outside herself in the direction of her daughter based on current evidence (of course not presented in court yet, but leaked)?

We are known by our fruits, our works, on earth by God. As a fruit inspector and not a judge, I see very little evidence of the fruits of the spirit as indicated in Galations 5:22-23 (love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, and temperance).

When we go a long time in conflict, as was indicated of the battles inside the Anthony household, the last thing that might have been brought up would be “What would Jesus do or say”.

There needs to be some “tough love” exercised here and just like George didn’t want to testify against his own daughter, he was much in favor of the truth rather than be a prisoner to a lie and the consequences thereof.

Summation: Casey’s mind has justified that her actions, right or wrong, right now, must follow a path of silence for self preservation’s sake.

Have you ever asked yourself “How many people who are incarcerated feel they were still innocent even with overwhelming evidence to the contrary”.

Samuel Gross, a University of Michigan law professor, has calculated that 2.3 percent of all prisoners sentenced to death between 1973 and 1989 have been exonerated and freed.

There are 2.2 million prisoners in the U.S. With this large a number, including overzealous prosecutors, corrupt LE, there are people locked up that should be free, if the TRUTH is known.

Having said that, the majority of prisoners are there because they did commit the crime due to a preponderance of the evidence presented in a court of law judged by a jury of their peers.

Our judicial system is not perfect but it is one of the best on the planet. I am confident a fair trial for Casey will prevail, but I am not convinced the whole truth will be known unless Caylee is found.

As for Cindy and George, knowing blood is thicker than water, I really am praying for you sincerely that in your heart, search for a real truth, and then read Galations 5:22-23. What proceeds verse 22 is 21 which states the works of the flesh: Envyings, murders, drunkeness, and revellings. For those that do these things SHALL not inherit the kingdom of God.

I work outside my home first of all. Second, any tipster should call LE, like everyone else does. Third, I believe Caylee is dead.

I send checks, because that is what Tim asked for, and I believe in his cause.

To argue is to

- give reasons for or against something : reason
- contend or disagree in words : dispute
- give evidence of
- to consider the pros and cons of
- to prove or try to prove by giving reasons
- to persuade by giving reasons

You are not simply voicing your opinion you are clearly arguing as well. If you are going to argue your opinion - and you are - then you have to be prepared for others to argue with you. If you can’t take the heat….

do they allow her to sleep in pc whenever she wants or do they cattle prod her….I would like that job…lOL

HMMM GIRLS. I HAVE NOT SEEN DAK POST A URL TO THE PROOF.

She always has missing children info and also pays respects to soldiers who’ve been killed - some of the reasons I put up with her show some nights. Tim would be a perfect regular and it would help with donations to keep him in the spotlight.

LMAO Now that is good.

You enjoying that trip to China?

“Nice Fantasy world you live in Catherine. if everybody in the world thought that way we would be in trouble.”

We would have to tell the judge to wheel in the alternate, we have an uncooperative juror.

Now, her remains can be anywhere at this point in time. Have faith she will be found.

you can certainly choose to believe this child is alive, everyone on here would like to agree, but when you argue as to why she is, it has to be constructed less subjectively and more objectively. You are trying to convince everyone you are correct or that your opinion has merit by constantly shooting holes in what has been accepted as relatively reliable. Not a good strategy. You argue that facts are not true by finding small exceptions - with dna, with le - and use them to back your opinion. You try to get people to defend their own opinions by shooting them down so do not tell me you are trying to convince them your opinion is better - your words show otherwise.