<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TVNZ&#8217;s groundbreaking YouTube debate</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118167</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Undecided Voter</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118167#comment-730704</link>
		<dc:creator>Undecided Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 09:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/118167#comment-730704</guid>
		<description>The problem I have is if I vote Labour then they will seek a partnership with the Greens and the Maori parties, and I don't like their policies. If I vote National they will seek a partnership with ACT, and I don't like their policies. It appears that no matter who I vote for another party will be in a position to push for policies that I did not vote for. This isn't proportional representation - it's proportional misrepresentation! It gives the leaders of the lesser parties a position of power that the majority of voters did not vote for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I have is if I vote Labour then they will seek a partnership with the Greens and the Maori parties, and I don&#8217;t like their policies. If I vote National they will seek a partnership with ACT, and I don&#8217;t like their policies. It appears that no matter who I vote for another party will be in a position to push for policies that I did not vote for. This isn&#8217;t proportional representation - it&#8217;s proportional misrepresentation! It gives the leaders of the lesser parties a position of power that the majority of voters did not vote for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwellm</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/118167#comment-719628</link>
		<dc:creator>pwellm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/118167#comment-719628</guid>
		<description>This is a question for the national party.  I have seen your ad on tv about improving literacy throughout NZ.  I am a literacy assistant at a school, I am very passionate about my job, and work hard to improve the children's reading, writing and spelling.  I get paid $12.69 an hour, which I consider to be a very low wage for what I do.  What is the national parties view on increasing support staff's rate of pay?  I think people like myself should be getting at least $14.62 and holiday pay, as I do not get any holiday pay at all and have to apply for a benefit every holidays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a question for the national party.  I have seen your ad on tv about improving literacy throughout NZ.  I am a literacy assistant at a school, I am very passionate about my job, and work hard to improve the children&#8217;s reading, writing and spelling.  I get paid $12.69 an hour, which I consider to be a very low wage for what I do.  What is the national parties view on increasing support staff&#8217;s rate of pay?  I think people like myself should be getting at least $14.62 and holiday pay, as I do not get any holiday pay at all and have to apply for a benefit every holidays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
