<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talk Is Cheap: Obama’s Actions Don’t Match His Rhetoric</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: NCCM USN(ret)</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622261</link>
		<dc:creator>NCCM USN(ret)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622261</guid>
		<description>@Paul "It was a time of peace then..." 

What about Libya's Line of Death, Lebanon, Ambassadors being assassinated and the general unrest that existed.  

Shielded by the bad economy? Only if you were single and lived on the ship - be real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul &#8220;It was a time of peace then&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>What about Libya&#8217;s Line of Death, Lebanon, Ambassadors being assassinated and the general unrest that existed.  </p>
<p>Shielded by the bad economy? Only if you were single and lived on the ship - be real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622182</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622182</guid>
		<description>I did serve from 78-84 when Obama would have. There was no point to signing up. It was a time of  peace then, the benefits for joining were horrible. I was in the Navy on Nuclear Submarines.
Obama is correct in saying there was no reason except the horrible inflationary periods of the early 80's... those of us in service were shielded from the bad economy of the days then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did serve from 78-84 when Obama would have. There was no point to signing up. It was a time of  peace then, the benefits for joining were horrible. I was in the Navy on Nuclear Submarines.<br />
Obama is correct in saying there was no reason except the horrible inflationary periods of the early 80&#8217;s&#8230; those of us in service were shielded from the bad economy of the days then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stiletto</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622029</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stiletto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622029</guid>
		<description>NCCM USN(ret): First off: LOVE your blog! And yes you have a very good point. Wonder why neither Stephanopoulos or Woodruff called hin on that. Either they did not remember their history, or they chose not to challenge him. They want to save their energy for tearing Sarah Palin to shreds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCCM USN(ret): First off: LOVE your blog! And yes you have a very good point. Wonder why neither Stephanopoulos or Woodruff called hin on that. Either they did not remember their history, or they chose not to challenge him. They want to save their energy for tearing Sarah Palin to shreds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stiletto</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622018</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stiletto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622018</guid>
		<description>Cooper: It would have taken you less than five minutes to find out that the McCain's sent their kids to private school since The Stiletto included a link in her post to an op-ed that contained this information. Nothing to hide - just didn't want to highlight it in the post but did include a link to the info. 

But in truth, McCain, Obama and Biden all sent their kids to private school. Only Sarah Palin has sent her kids to public school and that is one reason perhaps that middle class women identify with her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cooper: It would have taken you less than five minutes to find out that the McCain&#8217;s sent their kids to private school since The Stiletto included a link in her post to an op-ed that contained this information. Nothing to hide - just didn&#8217;t want to highlight it in the post but did include a link to the info. </p>
<p>But in truth, McCain, Obama and Biden all sent their kids to private school. Only Sarah Palin has sent her kids to public school and that is one reason perhaps that middle class women identify with her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stiletto</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622010</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stiletto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622010</guid>
		<description>OK: Are you a communist or something? Why should McCain give anyone his own property - actually, his wife's property (or in your worldview are women not allowed to own property in their own right apart from their husbands - you know, like chattel)? If you can think of a good enough reason, then use the same logic to give The Stiletto your house -she's tired of renting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK: Are you a communist or something? Why should McCain give anyone his own property - actually, his wife&#8217;s property (or in your worldview are women not allowed to own property in their own right apart from their husbands - you know, like chattel)? If you can think of a good enough reason, then use the same logic to give The Stiletto your house -she&#8217;s tired of renting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622003</link>
		<dc:creator>cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622003</guid>
		<description>http://www.johnmccain.com/about/mccainchildren.htm

Sorry the family history page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/about/mccainchildren.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnmccain.com/about/mccainchildren.htm</a></p>
<p>Sorry the family history page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622002</link>
		<dc:creator>cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-622002</guid>
		<description>There is a lot to say on  this, but let's start with the private school thing. First it is an opinion article not an article based on reason and written by a former Hilary supporter still bitter.
Someone once said the Internet will be the end of civilization because any  idiot can write anything and others blindly will believe it.


But let's just start with one fact - McCains' kids all went to private schools, his 4 with Cindy and his daughter with his former wife - she also went to Columbia University btw, and not only that but
"Between 2001 and 2006, McCain contributed roughly $950,000 to "The John and Cindy McCain Foundation",  his wife is its chairman and president. (A foundation to which they are almost the sole donors0. That accounted for all of its listed income other than for $100 that came from an anonymous donor. During that same period, the McCain foundation made contributions of roughly $1.6 million. More than $500,000 went to his kids’ private schools"

Here is the about the family page.

Please do some research. It took me five seconds to  find this. This post will be a good example of the total lack of research which goes into posts on the Internet.

Scary isn't it. And this is only a piece of the information posted here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot to say on  this, but let&#8217;s start with the private school thing. First it is an opinion article not an article based on reason and written by a former Hilary supporter still bitter.<br />
Someone once said the Internet will be the end of civilization because any  idiot can write anything and others blindly will believe it.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s just start with one fact - McCains&#8217; kids all went to private schools, his 4 with Cindy and his daughter with his former wife - she also went to Columbia University btw, and not only that but<br />
&#8220;Between 2001 and 2006, McCain contributed roughly $950,000 to &#8220;The John and Cindy McCain Foundation&#8221;,  his wife is its chairman and president. (A foundation to which they are almost the sole donors0. That accounted for all of its listed income other than for $100 that came from an anonymous donor. During that same period, the McCain foundation made contributions of roughly $1.6 million. More than $500,000 went to his kids’ private schools&#8221;</p>
<p>Here is the about the family page.</p>
<p>Please do some research. It took me five seconds to  find this. This post will be a good example of the total lack of research which goes into posts on the Internet.</p>
<p>Scary isn&#8217;t it. And this is only a piece of the information posted here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ok</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621932</link>
		<dc:creator>ok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621932</guid>
		<description>You wrote:that Todd Palin isn’t just talking about being an equal partner to his wife, but is staying home with the kids so she can actualize herself and realize her full career potential.- So if he is on the campaign trail he can not being staying home with the kids...

One could understand her questioning the opposite party she is working for but, Carly Fiorina questioned her own parties candidate!  So, if you have no type of confidence in your own candidate you work for how could anyone else think Palin/McCain are competent.  Although, they prove that more and more with each passing day-their incompetence.  

Just because my kids go to a private school, does not mean that those whom may not be able to take the extra expense to get theirs out of a failing public school-should not be valued.  You think McCain is willing to give the workers in Iowa one of his 7 houses, cause he understands the loss of job and homes and he is with them?  You can believe in something although you do not practice it.  IE:  I believe a woman has the right to choose, I however would not personally choose to have an abortion.  But, I still want those whom would have to make that choice for any reason to have that right legally!  Same with Public schools.  And no he is not beholden to anyone agenda...they support him because his party is one that will represent them best.  Obama is no more beholden to teachers union than McCain is to the 7 lobbiest that currently work on his campaign.  McCain however, is likely to appoint Phil Graham as a economic adviser if McCain is elected.  The same Graham that would call you a whiner for expressing your concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote:that Todd Palin isn’t just talking about being an equal partner to his wife, but is staying home with the kids so she can actualize herself and realize her full career potential.- So if he is on the campaign trail he can not being staying home with the kids&#8230;</p>
<p>One could understand her questioning the opposite party she is working for but, Carly Fiorina questioned her own parties candidate!  So, if you have no type of confidence in your own candidate you work for how could anyone else think Palin/McCain are competent.  Although, they prove that more and more with each passing day-their incompetence.  </p>
<p>Just because my kids go to a private school, does not mean that those whom may not be able to take the extra expense to get theirs out of a failing public school-should not be valued.  You think McCain is willing to give the workers in Iowa one of his 7 houses, cause he understands the loss of job and homes and he is with them?  You can believe in something although you do not practice it.  IE:  I believe a woman has the right to choose, I however would not personally choose to have an abortion.  But, I still want those whom would have to make that choice for any reason to have that right legally!  Same with Public schools.  And no he is not beholden to anyone agenda&#8230;they support him because his party is one that will represent them best.  Obama is no more beholden to teachers union than McCain is to the 7 lobbiest that currently work on his campaign.  McCain however, is likely to appoint Phil Graham as a economic adviser if McCain is elected.  The same Graham that would call you a whiner for expressing your concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy Briggs</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621929</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy Briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621929</guid>
		<description>The Stiletto seems to be clutching at straws here. I tried really hard to find something material in her long post which would be likely to influence an undecided elector one way or the other but I couldn't find it. These really are barely issues - let alone ones that are of significance. Poor stuff I'm afraid. And the charge of hypocrisy is way over the top...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Stiletto seems to be clutching at straws here. I tried really hard to find something material in her long post which would be likely to influence an undecided elector one way or the other but I couldn&#8217;t find it. These really are barely issues - let alone ones that are of significance. Poor stuff I&#8217;m afraid. And the charge of hypocrisy is way over the top&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NCCM USN(ret)</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621900</link>
		<dc:creator>NCCM USN(ret)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621900</guid>
		<description>"But keep in mind that I graduated in 1979. The Vietnam War had come to an end. We weren’t engaged in an active military conflict at that point. And so, it’s not an option that I ever decided to pursue."

Didn't Iran take hostages? Were we not in the middle of the Cold War? So the world at the time was such a blissful place so he didn't feel compelled to serve?

Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But keep in mind that I graduated in 1979. The Vietnam War had come to an end. We weren’t engaged in an active military conflict at that point. And so, it’s not an option that I ever decided to pursue.&#8221;</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t Iran take hostages? Were we not in the middle of the Cold War? So the world at the time was such a blissful place so he didn&#8217;t feel compelled to serve?</p>
<p>Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stiletto</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621811</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stiletto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621811</guid>
		<description>Carly Fiorina said none of the presidential and vice presidential candidates could run a Fortune 500 corporation because it takes a unique skillset - and then she added that it's not the job any of them are running for. Let's be accurate and fair when we quote people, OK? The Stiletto always includes links to someone's entire comments so people can check context and whether the snippet being quotes in an article is accurate. 

Palin's husband - as well as all four grandparents are actively involved in childcare. Obama's mother-in-law has been tending his kids while he and his wife are on the campaign trail. Both Obama and Palin are fortunate to have family living nearby they can rely on. Many who move out of their communities in search of better jobs don't have this luxury and must rely on daycare, nannies, etc. 

It matters where Obama's kids go to school because he gets financial and volunteer support from the two major teachers unions, which means he is beholden to their agenda of keeping bad teachers on the job no matter what (well, at least they are removed from the classroom - with pay - when accused of sexually abusing a child). His kids don't need to worry about bad teachers. At a private school the teachers work for the parents, not the state or city so if enough tuition paying parents have a complaint about a teacher his/her ass is out the door ASAP. Parents sending their kids to public schools don't have this power. That's why Obama's hypocrisy is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carly Fiorina said none of the presidential and vice presidential candidates could run a Fortune 500 corporation because it takes a unique skillset - and then she added that it&#8217;s not the job any of them are running for. Let&#8217;s be accurate and fair when we quote people, OK? The Stiletto always includes links to someone&#8217;s entire comments so people can check context and whether the snippet being quotes in an article is accurate. </p>
<p>Palin&#8217;s husband - as well as all four grandparents are actively involved in childcare. Obama&#8217;s mother-in-law has been tending his kids while he and his wife are on the campaign trail. Both Obama and Palin are fortunate to have family living nearby they can rely on. Many who move out of their communities in search of better jobs don&#8217;t have this luxury and must rely on daycare, nannies, etc. </p>
<p>It matters where Obama&#8217;s kids go to school because he gets financial and volunteer support from the two major teachers unions, which means he is beholden to their agenda of keeping bad teachers on the job no matter what (well, at least they are removed from the classroom - with pay - when accused of sexually abusing a child). His kids don&#8217;t need to worry about bad teachers. At a private school the teachers work for the parents, not the state or city so if enough tuition paying parents have a complaint about a teacher his/her ass is out the door ASAP. Parents sending their kids to public schools don&#8217;t have this power. That&#8217;s why Obama&#8217;s hypocrisy is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OK</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621767</link>
		<dc:creator>OK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621767</guid>
		<description>Republican in office is extremely expensive, say $700BILLION and counting expensive.  When bush took office he had a BALANCED BUDGET and now look where we are.  McCain is just a Bush clone.  Apparently, Mccain's hiring of Women, Carly Forina does not think he is qualified to run the company she ran into the ground before getting fired.  Palin's husband is not with the kids, he is along side her on the campaign trail-so which one raises the kids?  
Republicans have always cahmpioned the voucher systems for choice of schools, so why would it matter where Obama's kids go to school.  How about those homeschool kids working the phone at the republican Campaign offices in several states-is that alarming to you?  You are a shoe- one that needs to be changed just like the party you represent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican in office is extremely expensive, say $700BILLION and counting expensive.  When bush took office he had a BALANCED BUDGET and now look where we are.  McCain is just a Bush clone.  Apparently, Mccain&#8217;s hiring of Women, Carly Forina does not think he is qualified to run the company she ran into the ground before getting fired.  Palin&#8217;s husband is not with the kids, he is along side her on the campaign trail-so which one raises the kids?<br />
Republicans have always cahmpioned the voucher systems for choice of schools, so why would it matter where Obama&#8217;s kids go to school.  How about those homeschool kids working the phone at the republican Campaign offices in several states-is that alarming to you?  You are a shoe- one that needs to be changed just like the party you represent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621714</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117818#comment-621714</guid>
		<description>It is quite possible that the women on Obama's campaign staff are not as qualified as the men he has on staff and that could very well be the explanation for the difference in pay. Also it is worth noting the women who are on Obama's campaign can choose not to work for his campaign if they feel they are unjustly paid. They also have an option to ask for higher pay, which it seems they have not in effect telling us they except the pay they recieve as fair.  

---

As for military service, so what, who cares? Look at John Kerry he was a decorated serviceman and our current president never seen combat while in service. What happened, people voted for George Bush. What about Dick Cheney arguably a draft dodger as Bush's running mate and they still get elected. In short I do not believe Obama not serviing in the military will be of significance in this campaign. 

It works for McCain being a war hero (nothing wrong with that). McCain used it to his political advantage all his adult life if it works for him, it's all good.

Obama focused his time and energy toward "community organizing" the term attacked by the right sad to say. It's a good thing to help the community especially Chicage where I spent half my life.   

---

Public Education I would say it is up to parents to decide where they want to send there kids. Do political leaders always have to lead by example? 

What kind of a utopian society do we need to live in if every polition had to live the life of polices they propose? 

Let's get back to the issues and move away from getting personal. It seems this is only a distraction.

I wish George Bush could lead by example he has solar panels on his house yet promotes federal dereglation of smog emissions, and does not help enforce federal laws to help keep our air clean. A perfect example of not leading by example. In the end nobody cares or largely knows GW has solar panels, they care about what they are or are not doing about public policy.

In short I believe we will be moving in the direction of "change" with Obama and get more of the same with McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is quite possible that the women on Obama&#8217;s campaign staff are not as qualified as the men he has on staff and that could very well be the explanation for the difference in pay. Also it is worth noting the women who are on Obama&#8217;s campaign can choose not to work for his campaign if they feel they are unjustly paid. They also have an option to ask for higher pay, which it seems they have not in effect telling us they except the pay they recieve as fair.  </p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>As for military service, so what, who cares? Look at John Kerry he was a decorated serviceman and our current president never seen combat while in service. What happened, people voted for George Bush. What about Dick Cheney arguably a draft dodger as Bush&#8217;s running mate and they still get elected. In short I do not believe Obama not serviing in the military will be of significance in this campaign. </p>
<p>It works for McCain being a war hero (nothing wrong with that). McCain used it to his political advantage all his adult life if it works for him, it&#8217;s all good.</p>
<p>Obama focused his time and energy toward &#8220;community organizing&#8221; the term attacked by the right sad to say. It&#8217;s a good thing to help the community especially Chicage where I spent half my life.   </p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Public Education I would say it is up to parents to decide where they want to send there kids. Do political leaders always have to lead by example? </p>
<p>What kind of a utopian society do we need to live in if every polition had to live the life of polices they propose? </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get back to the issues and move away from getting personal. It seems this is only a distraction.</p>
<p>I wish George Bush could lead by example he has solar panels on his house yet promotes federal dereglation of smog emissions, and does not help enforce federal laws to help keep our air clean. A perfect example of not leading by example. In the end nobody cares or largely knows GW has solar panels, they care about what they are or are not doing about public policy.</p>
<p>In short I believe we will be moving in the direction of &#8220;change&#8221; with Obama and get more of the same with McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
