Yours Sincerely,
Mark David Sirhan Bin Oswald Ray, Jr.

PS: Somebody kill the babysitter.

Their favorite words are liberal,twoofer,tin foil hat,moonbat and loons.
They love to spam the internet with these words

Coincidence theorists that rush to defend BushCo’s story will have you believe that it’s perfectly normal for passports to fly out of terrorist pockets thru a massive fireball plane crash and float safely to the ground undamaged.

To them paper is stronger than steel and airline black boxes.

As well these coincidence theorists will explain to you that it’s perfectly normal for a plane to nosedive into the ground leaving a large crater in the ground and for the wreckage/debris to run for 10 miles.

It’s also just a coincidence that the day before the 911 attacks Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon announced they had “misplaced” 2 TRILLION dollars and coincidentally the “plane” that struck the Pentagon hit the wing that contained the accounting investigation.

Coincidentally George Bush’s brother Marvin sat on the board of the Kuwaiti-owned company which provided electronic security to the World Trade Centre, Dulles Airport and United Airlines.

It’s also a coincidence that Osama Bin Laden use to be an intelligence asset for the CIA.

What a surprise that planes were used to attack the Free-est country in the world..no one could have seen that coming..right Condi ?i mean there were the exact same drills happening but thats an unknown coincidence…coincidentally the protocols of the shooting down of hijacked aircraft was altered on June 1, 2001, taking discretion away from field commanders and placing it solely in the hands of the Secretary of Defense,

It’s just a coincidence that John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft in July 2001 on account of security considerations and had nothing to do with any warnings he might have received regarding September 11, at least that’s what he told the 911 Commission.

The fact that the Patriot Act was written before 911 isn’t suspicious. It’s just a coincidence that they would need to use it so soon after writing it.

it’s true that George HW Bush and Shafig bin Laden, Osama’s brother, spent the morning of September 11 together at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family. It’s just a crazy strange coincidence that his brother would pull off 911 while he was with that presidents dad.

Coincidentally FEMA arrived in New York on Sept 10 to prepare for a scheduled biowarfare drill, and had a triage centre ready to go that was larger and better equipped than the one that was lost in the collapse of WTC 7, what a lucky twist of fate.

Multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 – one simulating the crash of a plane into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings – and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, what a bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence.

Remember the anthrax attacks ? coincidentally the
White House went on Cipro September 11 a lucky break or does that just show the foresightedness of America’s emergency response.
Also lucky for the White House that the anthrax was mailed to their opponents…can u say coincidence ?

i could go on and on about the many coincidences that these people ignore but i think instead i’ll turn on some Fox news and take a couple sleeping pills so as not to have any nightmares about muslim boogeyman taking away my freedoms.

Any idea what the terror alert is at ?

please don’t let it be orange.

great piece “jefferson flanders”

NIST set out to explain the collapse of WTC 7 by reconstructing the collapse as a theoretical computer model. Instead they constructed an altogether different collapse — not the one that needed explaining, but one that did not occur.

In videos of the actual collapse, such as at the start of http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_videos/wtc_videos.html, walls and edges of the building remain fairly straight and vertical as the building descends. In the NIST computer model the exterior severely buckles before the building descends. (Pages 107-108 in document NCSTAR 1-9A). The top of the building was not observed collapsing in on itself as NIST claims. See for yourself on the NIST web page http://wtc.nist.gov.

This is not a minor quibble, but a major contradiction. The NIST theory does not fit the facts. It should be a major scandal.

It’s funny, you twoofers keep saying that, yet it doesn’t get any more true.

And, hey, it’s also funny how all these “engineers” and “architects” can’t seem to muster a single piece of peer-reviewed research to back their wacky claims - unless you count Richard Gage’s cardboard box display

“…Stubblebine said he was confounded by his continual failure to walk through his wall.”

You clearly need to do more research and review basic physics, as you have a very incomplete understanding of the events of 9/11/01 and the relevant science.

Start by visiting the following websites:

ae911truth.org

911research.wtc7.net

stj911.org

If you wish to enter into a dialogue regarding 9/11, feel free to email me at crockett911truth@yahoo.com.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

You did not point out an important possible motive for LIHOP or MIHOP. They actually believed we were are in a “Clash of Civilizations” or Third World War and that the public was not ready for it so an operation that would kill Americans was needed to save many more in the long run. Several members of the neo conservative movement were Holocaust survivors. It is well documented that the Vice President has a very dark view of people. The President is a reformed alcohol (or more) abuser who has been “saved” and has fundamentalist tendencies. Another words it makes sense that this group would view the Islamic fundamentalist terrorist movement in extensional terms that would justify the treasonous act of letting or creating an attack on ones own country.

You stated that us LIHOP folks have no “smoking gun”. I think we have a lot of circumstantial evidence of advanced knowledge but I agree we don’t have that smoking gun and believe it is never going to happen because the 9/11 truth movement is losing ground. You see despite the information explosion one needs subpoena powers to unlock smoking guns which your conspiracy theorists sitting behind his desk do not have. In order to get that you are going to in a matter like 9/11 you need some political support. Why you won’t get it pressure from for this type of thing Republicans and Fox News is obvious. So I will focus on those that have an Air America view of the world. The Republicans have been getting traction from this whole those elitists look down on you campaign. This is nothing new the Republicans have used this with success since the 1960’s. Contrary to popular view for any marketing campaign to succeed it has to have some grain of truth. What have we heard for the last 6 years Bush is stupid, Bush is incompetent etc. Bush was elected twice and the republicans are making it awfully close this year in election that should have been democrat landslides. Be it Iraq, scuttling the constitution and now scuttling capitalism to bail out their friends these dummies have gotten exactly what they wanted from those smart democrats. Over the years we have read from “liberal” commentators every subterfuge that The Bush Administration used to get us in Iraq. When 9/11 truthers accuse the administration of willingness to “do anything it takes” these same commentators are incredulous. Unlike this blogger who uses logic and reason I have read countless times a version of “ I thought it was bad enough the gullible public bought into Bush twice but if they believe these idiots could pull off 9/11 god help us”. So with the conservatives viewing the 9/11 truth movement as treasonous and the liberals viewing it with contempt forget about any investigation. With the Bush presidency ending and time marching on the truth movement will continue to lose stream. I hope I’m wrong

So Mossad can go around spying on Americans with impunity, and if anyone mentions it, they are anti-semitic?

Your obvious ideological agenda blows any claim of objectivity out of your article.

Your attempt to perpetuate islamaphobia is a complete failure. Al CIAda is CIA/Mossad front. A bunch of patsies.

Newsflash: We all see through this transparent, low-IQ propagandist bullsh*t.

As many others have pointed out, you have applied Occam’s Razor incorrectly as your explanations do not account for all of the facts nor the relevant physics.

Let’s begin with the most obvious anomaly from 9/11/01, WTC 7. NIST’s latest report on the building depends on an elaborate model which shows the structural steel frame “collapsing” asymmetrically, but every video of the building’s rapid demise clearly shows it imploding symmetrically. Any objective analysis has to conclude that NIST’s computer model is seriously flawed and must be rejected. Additionally, FEMA found portions of steel from WTC 7 that had been vaporized and yet NIST fails to explain this documented phenomenon.

Since you choose to attack the performance of the FAA, let’s consider some significant facts regarding their actions on that terrible day. First, scrambling jets to intercept planes is a routine operation undertaken about every two to three days by the FAA and NORAD, year in and year out. Yet you claim that they failed miserably at this on all four occasions on 9/11/01. Please cite your specific evidence documenting the FAA failure in this regard. Second, on 9/11/01 the FAA managed to land thousands of planes in a few hours safely, an unprecedented achievement. Certainly, this belies the myth that the FAA performed incompetently that day, agreed?

Finally, you seem to be relying on Popular Mechanics for most of your information, but have clearly not read the thoroughly footnoted response from Dr. David Ray Griffin, Debunking 9/11 Debunking. I suggest you get a copy and while your buying books, also get his book, 9/11 Contradictions, as this will step you through 25 well documented unanswered questions regarding the events of 9/11/01.

FYI, the 9/11 truth movement is growing daily and is made up of people from all walks of life and every profession, from pilots to plumbers, polls now show that one in three Americans seriously question the government’s deeply flawed conspiracy theory.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

What changed? They became aware of more and more facts surrounding the event as time went on (no thanks to the government, which tried its best to prevent any investigation/illumination). At a certain critical mass of awareness, an obvious alternative explanation presented itself to them. They had to decide (subconsciously to a large extent) whether to accept and explore the ramifications of this alternate theory, allowing their belief system to evolve in the process, OR deny it at face value, simply because it didn’t fit in with their incumbent view of the world (though for many of us, it was not much of a stretch).

This much is true… the amount of factual evidence and detail on 9/11 in the public domain has grown by leaps and bounds over the past 7 years, and will probably continue to grow in the near future. Furthermore, the 9/11 truth movement *is* growing rapidly, as evident in the growth of various organisations such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, We Are Change and 9/11 Truth chapters, and more recently Firefighters for 9/11 Truth. So, for you to suggest that we are in decline only proves that you really do have blinders on.

It is in fact supporters of the official theory who are now on the defensive, and are most guilty of slander and violent threats. What’s next? Locking us up in camps or prisons, as certain other individuals on your side have suggested? You may find the movement is growing faster than you can erect new camps.

Lies are always quick to form and propagate rapidly. The truth emerges slowly, but gathers mass and velocity like a snowball rolling down a mountain. Because this movement seeks the truth and does not fear it, it will continue to grow. It has the means to grow now more than ever… and those who fear the truth are moving to cripple those means, but they will fail because their tools are deceit and suppression, and those who love truth and freedom will not suffer them.

Your pride is worth less than the failing US dollar, Jeff. Such a wonder it is, then, that you hold on to it so tightly.

Don’t you see why people are challenging the official story more than 7 years later?? “You can kill a man, but an idea… an idea is bulletproof.”

HAHAHAHA The thing is getting so big, so may important people, scientists, politicians, and famous people have come out to speak the truth…Losing ground, ha…what a bunch of propaganda.

Occams Razor would require you to assume that controlled demolition was the method.

I believe Richard Gage:

September 11, 2008

Peter B Collins talks to Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, about NIST’s finding that the third building that collapsed into its own footprint at the speed of gravity on 9/11/2001 did so because of a “new phenomenon” they call “thermal expansion”.

http://www.radiodujour.com/people/gage_richard/

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false flag conspiracy plan, proposed within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington”.

This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on foreign governments.

Also, a conspiracy does not have to run perfectly. Not everything can go as planned. No one knows how many people were involved, what part each played, and what went wrong. The “why” argument does not help either side.

We should all be asking for more investigation in regards to the worst known anomalies, not brushing it off with whatever’s “simpler” to understand.

Also, BBC’s and Popular Mechanics’ “debunking” have been exposed and debunked. Sorry.

The NIST provisional report on WTC #7 is quite an odd document. It invokes a never-before-seen phenomenon involving ‘thermal expansion’ of the steel support structures to account for the collapse of WTC #7. The building would have needed a huge amount of explosives to bring it down, says the report; yet relatively small fires inside, it says, worked fine somehow — an odd contradiction that the head of NIST could not explain in his press conference on the topic.

Comments sent by engineers and architects (see http://www.ae911truth.org/) to NIST about the report dismantle it.

Finally, Occam’s Razor is not correctly applied by the author or, for that matter, whoever else invokes it when trying to rebut 9/11 truth. OR dictates that the simplest theory WHICH ACCOUNTS FOR THE EVIDENCE is the most likely theory. Therefore, using OR, the official theory has to be thrown out because it doesn’t account for all the evidence.

Google patriots question 911.

You will be amazed at the calibre of people on these sites, including 25 military officers complete with their pictures and bios, federal engineers, state department veterans, CIA veterans, a fighter pilots and Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force like Robert Bowman. Also, firefighters question 911. When you see this evidence you will be shocked and angry that the main stream media has kept this from you.

- Raymond McGovern, PhD, former Chairman of the CIA’s National Intelligence Estimates (NIE) and 27-year CIA veteran. “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke.” (According to the CIA, NIE’s are “the most authoritative written judgments concerning national security issues”)

- William Christison, former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis, overseeing 250 CIA analysts. 29-year CIA veteran. “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. … The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them.”

- Melvin Goodman, PhD, former Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs and Senior Analyst from 1966 - 1990. “The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup. I don’t know how else to describe it.”

- General Albert Stubblebine, former commanding general of U.S. Army Intelligence. 32-year U.S. Army veteran. “I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole.’ So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What’s going on?”

For decades, we relied on these individuals to collect information essential to our national security and provide critical analysis during which time the U.S. faced far more real and much more serious threats than anything today. We cannot now ignore their stunning condemnation of the official account of 9/11.

Information about 1,000 other credible critics of the official account of 9/11 is available at http://PatriotsQuestion911.com/