Comments on: John Edwards Scandal: Fox News Gives New Edwards’ Time Line http://www.bloggernews.net/117693 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:21:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Ideal Skeptic http://www.bloggernews.net/117693#comment-586511 Ideal Skeptic Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:43:57 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/117693#comment-586511 Come to think of it, John & Elizabeth Edwards never lived in Annapolis. So that can't be Rielle Hunter she's referring to. I vaguely remember reading that she lived in Annapolis when her father was in the Navy. Come to think of it, John & Elizabeth Edwards never lived in Annapolis. So that can’t be Rielle Hunter she’s referring to. I vaguely remember reading that she lived in Annapolis when her father was in the Navy.

]]> By: Cherubim http://www.bloggernews.net/117693#comment-585631 Cherubim Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:33:00 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/117693#comment-585631 The “Saving Graces” paperback was published officially on Aug. 14, 2007. Elizabeth Edwards writes: “It is hard to describe the test of public life, the way people believe — to some degree correctly — that you belong to them. There are awful examples, of course, of those whose motives are selfish or not admirable, who pry their way into the lives of public people in order to exploit a kindness or a generous gesture. They are to be endured and, to some extent I largely chose to ignore, feared. They remind me of a more malicious version of the people who wandered into our house in Annapolis, walking around our living room, putting their hands on our things. It is a sad fact that these people are a threat to anyone with even the smallest amount of celebrity.” The “Saving Graces” paperback was published officially on Aug. 14, 2007.

Elizabeth Edwards writes:

“It is hard to describe the test of public life, the way people believe — to some degree correctly — that you belong to them. There are awful examples, of course, of those whose motives are selfish or not admirable, who pry their way into the lives of public people in order to exploit a kindness or a generous gesture. They are to be endured and, to some extent I largely chose to ignore, feared. They remind me of a more malicious version of the people who wandered into our house in Annapolis, walking around our living room, putting their hands on our things. It is a sad fact that these people are a threat to anyone with even the smallest amount of celebrity.”

]]> By: Ideal Skeptic http://www.bloggernews.net/117693#comment-584458 Ideal Skeptic Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:27:27 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/117693#comment-584458 Check the statements that Elizabeth Edwards put out at the time. I think she might have said something about "at the end of 2006." I remember hearing a lot about it being just before and/or after he announced his candidacy, which was December 28. That definitely equals "at the end of 2006." And, not to add to your conspiracy theories, don't forget the tricky bit in Elizabeth's People magazine article (via her brother, friend and a lot of "sources") where they all make the claim that the truth came out in pieces, over time. That doesn't exactly work with "end of 2006." Check the statements that Elizabeth Edwards put out at the time. I think she might have said something about “at the end of 2006.” I remember hearing a lot about it being just before and/or after he announced his candidacy, which was December 28. That definitely equals “at the end of 2006.”

And, not to add to your conspiracy theories, don’t forget the tricky bit in Elizabeth’s People magazine article (via her brother, friend and a lot of “sources”) where they all make the claim that the truth came out in pieces, over time. That doesn’t exactly work with “end of 2006.”

]]>