When you want to know how much a conservative political candidate frightens the hard left in this country, check out the blog reactions to that candidates’ appearance and speeches. On liberal sites ranging from normally moderate communities like Alas to cesspools of angry moonbattery like Pandagon, the paranoid and often outright delusional posts have been coming fast and furious since the announcement that Alaska governor Sarah Palin will be John McCain’s running mate. It is almost reassuring that the radicals of the left are this worried about Sarah Palin - it demonstrates that they aren’t as tin-eared about political reality as they sometimes appear. They know she is a threat to their agenda, and that she is catching fire with an American populace yearning for leaders they can trust and believe in. Because of that, there is no restraint in their continuing attacks on Governor Palin and her record of genuine accomplishment.
Where liberals cannot get their stories to stick, they revert to simple name-calling and sexist accusations and whispers about the ability of a woman candidate to balance work and family life. No lie is too outrageous; no issue too complex to use to smear the candidate. Now the mainstream media is attempting to use these unfounded attacks and baseless accusations to spin a narrative of Palin as an embattled candidate. Unfortunately for her enemies on the radical left side of the aisle, Sarah Palin isn’t embattled. Embattled implies that your opponent’s blows are having an effect. Palin is under attack - but she’s kicking the crap out of her attackers and showing middle America the steel she is made of.
Governor Palin’s speech tonight was no exception. From a vigorous defense of her competence to govern - leavened with a devastating slam of Senator Obama’s “community organizing” job - to her cutting attacks on Obama’s high-tax, big-government agenda, Palin hit this speech out of the park without a missed note or a single rhetorical fumble. Those obsessed with the centrality of Washington in our nation’s political life often misunderstand something about politics out in the small towns and small states of this country: that periphery is where the really great ones hone their skills. Sarah Palin has spent years developing her political acumen and ability to connect with ordinary Americans - not angling for plum committee assignments in a sclerotic Congress or scheming to get trivial bits of legislation passed with her name on them. She is a pro, and she came to the Republican National Convention with a pro’s approach - but with the heart of a genuine American citizen who loves her country and serves her nation as best she can.
Refreshingly, she chose to take the high road and largely ignore the foolish attacks on her family, on her character, and on her record - attacks made all the more ineffective by the obvious, frothingly partisan rage of the people carrying them out. As a result, her speech was inspiring to the conservative base, reassuringly competent and issue-focused for the voters yet to reach a decision, and dispiriting to the liberal media and liberal establishment who had comforted themselves with the hope that John McCain would be running a staid and status-quo campaign, against which the rhetorical hopefulness and eternal changiness of the Obama campaign would find purchase in the hearts of ordinary Americans. Instead, Palin has made it crystal clear that the McCain-Palin ticket will be running on promises of genuine change - of strengthening America in the world, of developing the energy sources that our nation needs to grow and to prosper, and to shake up the long-moribund culture of tacit corruption and quiet gridlock that has enmeshed Washington for the last twenty years.
Even more frightening to those of our friends on the left who can perceive the course of the future, Sarah Palin has made it clear that she will be a force to be reckoned with, not only in 2008 and in 2012, but for the remainder of the time that Governor Palin chooses to devote to the service of her country - be it four years or forty. Like Ronald Reagan, Palin is a self-motivated person with an agenda born from her own beliefs, not the scripted talking points of a comfortable and cosseted media elite or a stultified political class, but the genuine and heartfelt values that she was raised with and which she has claimed as her own.
Tonight at the XCel Energy Center, America was introduced not just to our next vice-President, but to the person most likely to carry the GOP leadership torch forward for the next decade. It is too early to start talking about President Palin - but it is not too early to start considering what an astonishing and welcome development that President Palin would represent, both for the Republican Party and for the United States of America.















13 users commented in " Palin Acceptance Speech: Hockey Mom Takes it to the Democrats "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackI have to admit The parting of the waters and healing the planet quip was priceless. Its going to be a very close election and I am eager to find out how the speech played amongst undecided voters,
Me too. I suspect it played very well, but it’s hard to be objective.
It was a speech full of sound and fury – and it signified nothing. No doubt crafted by Carl Rove it was as facile as it was empty and as offensive as it was illiterate. Talk about appealing to the lowest common denominator in American society – it actually aimed much lower than that. It will appeal to some of the frightened and the confused, to the empty patriots and the stay at home rednecks. But only to some of them, thank God. Will this type of empty rhetoric pursued a thinking American to vote for McCain/Palin? Of course not. And in the world outside we look on with perplexed horror at the spectacle of a once great Nation, and a once great Party, flirting so shamefully with the thought that this trivial, prejudiced, narrow woman could actually be spoken of as a person who will be in the line of the great Americans – from Washington through to Clinton. But, then, if America has twice put the unendurable George W Bush in the White House anything can happen, I suppose.
The speech was remarkably smug, petty, and sarcastic. It played well with the Republican base at the convention, but how well will it play with the general public.
Compare the more level headed speeches at the DNC with the those at the RNC. The Republicans are very angry. Angry at the media. Angry at the left. But they’re the ones who have been in power for the last 8 years…
Bush himself spoke of “the angry left,” but comparing the two conventions, it’s the republicans who are angry while the Democrats are happy and celebrating.
They seemed weak on stage John McCain, Sarah Palin, and family.
Looked like Sarah was John McCain’s Grand daughter.
Who respects Sarah Palin mother of a pregnant teen out of wedlock. Does the Christian Right approve? Does the Party of so-called moral family values approve?
I think the Christian Right is a bit hypocritical by there sheer silence on Sarah’s Daughter, or does the religious right have skeletons in the closet like the rest of society?
Personally I don’t care about the family situation but I am shocked that the ones who tout moral family values are mute on the subject.
I guess Sarah Palin she gets a free pass by the Christian Right Conservatives.
Hypocritical? There is nothing hypocritical about recognizing human imperfection and excersizing forgivness -we all need mercy and grace for our imperfections.
What would be hypocritical, Rich, is if the so-called “Christian Right Conservatives” supported Palin even if she had an agenda condoning premarital sex or abortion.
But she doesn’t. In fact it’s admerable that dispite her family hardships, which we all experience, she continues to be a great supporting mother.
This speech played very well with me. This Democrat is voting for the Republican ticket!!!!
Oh, ok, so forgive if premarital sex is going on at home and it is not on her national agenda.
What goes on at home is off limits and promote the Republicans so-called “Christian family values” for an agenda ie against premarital sex or abortion.
The laundry list is very very long of both republicans and democrats premarital sex problems just seem evident the Christian Right made palin a “third rail” lets not talk about it or make it an issue.
Yes I would conclude it is hypocricial theys “forgive” palin and selectively choose who they will go after if they do not have moral family values.
Parading a pregnant unwed Daughter on the national stage with the father of the pregnant daughter flys in the face of Christian moral family values.
I guess “forgiveness” is a selective trump card.
We can argue all day Rich about this really, but I’m not going to. I just need to say -true you need to look at a candidate’s family life to see if they “walk the talk” and stands behind their principles. But any mother or father will contest that even though you strive to maintain and culture good moral values and standards within the family, human nature sometimes prevails. What matters is how you recover from those moments. Her daughter made the decision, not her mother or father. What’s done is done, so now what’s a parent to do? Cover it up by encouraging an abortion? Or pick up the pieces and move on as a family? Her unwed daughter is still her daughter who disserves to be with her family -she is not being “paraded” around.
Governor Palin’s speech was so good and her credentials are so powerful that the so-called “liberal” media and commentators are scurrying to find fault. This lady is the new Margaret Thatcher. If you Americans don’t vote for McCain and Palin, please can we have one of them here in Britain? We’re desperate for good leadership here and need a whole new government, especially a new Prime Minister.
John I never encourage abortion. Ultimatly I believe it is the decision of the pregnant person through consultation of father, doctors, professionals, family.
Palin oddly enough is not for terminating the pregnancy if the pregnant person needed to have an abortion in the special case of rape or incest.
McCain’s wife agrees in the case of incest or rape the pregnant person should have that option of termination.
——-
John didnt they parade around the father of the unwed daughter? thats what I’m referring too. I don’t think they are even engaged, seems he is in it for the show and may opt out after the campaign is over.
———–
Seems like Sarah Palin did not instill Christian Family Values to her children enough to keep her legs crossed. I just hope she keeps Christian family values theme out of her campaign. It is also odd the Christian Right has fall silent on this. I guess the Christian right is politically motivated more-so then it’s biblical foundation.
——–
I’m not here to “argue” but rather state my observations and opinion like everyone else.
Yes, Gov. Palin has energized the Republican Party. But, what about the undecided voters?
While the political conventions and blogs prove that many Americans planted their flags firmly in their candidates’ camps months ago, there are millions of Americans who are far less partisan who may be willing to cross party lines come November.
Applied to the most devoted followers, objectivity is not the strong suit of Obamaphiles or McCainiacs. It’s improbable, if not impossible, for either group in either party to accurately assess the way in which a dispassionate, undecided voter heard Palin’s speech. That point is evidenced upthread as a poster begins their comment on Palin’s speech by using phrases like “confused and frightened”, “lowest common denominator”, and the oxymoronic, “empty patriots”. We can all speculate the day away, but even many key Democratic strategists, politicians, and pundits, while disagreeing with the content of Gov. Palin’s speech, have agreed that it was nonetheless compelling.
I also noticed the same poster’s opinion that Palin’s speech was “illiterate”. By extension, that illiteracy was connected to “Carl Rove” who, according to the poster, probably “crafted” that speech. An accepted defintion of illiteracy is a lack of acquaintance with the fundamentals of a particular subject. That may apply here as the man’s name is correctly spelled, “Karl Rove”, not “Carl Rove”. Furthermore, Rove didn’t craft Palin’s speech. It was, according to Barack Obama in his criticism of it, written by Matthew Scully. Rove, who was indicted in July, 2008 by a Congressional panel on a Contempt of Congress charge, serves as an informal adviser to the McCain campaign. He writes election essays for Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, and is a Fox News Contributor. Just a heads up.
bystander
Ok Karl not Carl, that isn’t illiteracy its a typo!
Nor is “empty patriot” an oxymoron. Patriotism is empty when it is not underpinned by knowledge and experience. Palin’s patriotism is empty becuase she has no reference points to check it by. 44 years old and she has never travelled outside North America. Easy to be a patriot in these circumstances isn’t it. At least McCain’s patriotism was tested by fire…
Leave A Reply