<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democratic National Convention - The Hillary Voters and Sarah Palin</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: psburton</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-536214</link>
		<dc:creator>psburton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-536214</guid>
		<description>Bob I agree that if the Dems allow the message to focus on the individual or rather mocking her commendable accomplishments they will lose a big slice of women voters, but If we offer respect for her personal accomplishmenmts while pointing out her Ideals are contrary to the  very reason they call themselves democrat to begin with, Its going to be President Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob I agree that if the Dems allow the message to focus on the individual or rather mocking her commendable accomplishments they will lose a big slice of women voters, but If we offer respect for her personal accomplishmenmts while pointing out her Ideals are contrary to the  very reason they call themselves democrat to begin with, Its going to be President Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-535653</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-535653</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin is a Creationist who wants Genesis taught coequally with biology in science classes (so how does she feel about federal funding for medical research?). She homeschools her children (most homeschoolers want to see the public education system destroyed). She is so anti-abortion that she knowingly chose to give birth to a Downs Syndrome baby (she is unlikely to support women's reproductive rights). Women supporting Hillary Clinton weren't voting for Hillary's vagina but for her stance on political issues---I can't imagine any Democrat with an IQ higher than 10 supporting Sarah Palin. 

And there's more. Education? Palin has only a BA in journalism from the University of Idaho (compare &#38; contrast with Obama's JD Harvard). Experience? Nothing in foreign relations--- just at the moment when the Middle East, Russia, and Africa are all tinderboxes. Domestic policy, executive experience? A housewife who went from the School Board to being mayor of a town of 6500 to &#60;two years as governor of a remote and thinly-populated state. She has spent very little time in the Lower 48 (talk about Obama being alien to American life). Ethics? While she is supporting Alaska's oil interests, her husband is pulling in an income from BP Alaska. This appointment was politically brilliant but it shows McCain's motto of "Country First" to be a BIG LIE because this was "Politics First". And to top it all off, we are now told that Palin is an athlete, a hunter, a gun-shooter, tough, a rebel, a maverick, strong etc---but that Biden must handle her with kid gloves in debate because she is a WOMAN (and you can bet that if he does that, he will be criticized by the Republicans as patronizing a woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin is a Creationist who wants Genesis taught coequally with biology in science classes (so how does she feel about federal funding for medical research?). She homeschools her children (most homeschoolers want to see the public education system destroyed). She is so anti-abortion that she knowingly chose to give birth to a Downs Syndrome baby (she is unlikely to support women&#8217;s reproductive rights). Women supporting Hillary Clinton weren&#8217;t voting for Hillary&#8217;s vagina but for her stance on political issues&#8212;I can&#8217;t imagine any Democrat with an IQ higher than 10 supporting Sarah Palin. </p>
<p>And there&#8217;s more. Education? Palin has only a BA in journalism from the University of Idaho (compare &amp; contrast with Obama&#8217;s JD Harvard). Experience? Nothing in foreign relations&#8212; just at the moment when the Middle East, Russia, and Africa are all tinderboxes. Domestic policy, executive experience? A housewife who went from the School Board to being mayor of a town of 6500 to &lt;two years as governor of a remote and thinly-populated state. She has spent very little time in the Lower 48 (talk about Obama being alien to American life). Ethics? While she is supporting Alaska&#8217;s oil interests, her husband is pulling in an income from BP Alaska. This appointment was politically brilliant but it shows McCain&#8217;s motto of &#8220;Country First&#8221; to be a BIG LIE because this was &#8220;Politics First&#8221;. And to top it all off, we are now told that Palin is an athlete, a hunter, a gun-shooter, tough, a rebel, a maverick, strong etc&#8212;but that Biden must handle her with kid gloves in debate because she is a WOMAN (and you can bet that if he does that, he will be criticized by the Republicans as patronizing a woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-535170</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-535170</guid>
		<description>Mr. Hayes your statement "but they wanted a Democrat to win and they were willing to suck it up and take one for the party, in pretty much the same way that an emotionally-abused wife sucks it up and takes the abuse for her kids’ sake." is a very bizarre, grotesque comparison.
Sarah palin is indeed a fine human being, with attractive family values.  However, Clinton supporter do not support her because she is a women, granted that is an plus for some women, but do not insult the intellegence of women whom would vote for clinton.  She is pro choice, pro civil union, pro national health care to name a few and Palin is NOT- hello women be it 40, 50 or 60 are not so simple minded ,as you portrayed in your creative writing, to vote for someone cause they are bitter, -again written in a creative way in your writing.  
You go on to write " think her personal charisma and the appeal of her bio will “convert” a lot of those Hillary supporters into Palin pals, and they will pull the lever for the ticket with their new identity-partner on it." 
New identity partner? Clinton supporter (and it seems you think they are only women) are selecting their choice based on issues they identify with not -"oh she has kids, I have kids, she played sports, I played sports and she is pretty and has charm- YUP I'M VOTING FOR MCCAIN/PALIN TICKET"

Not sure but seems like you may be the Misogynist....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Hayes your statement &#8220;but they wanted a Democrat to win and they were willing to suck it up and take one for the party, in pretty much the same way that an emotionally-abused wife sucks it up and takes the abuse for her kids’ sake.&#8221; is a very bizarre, grotesque comparison.<br />
Sarah palin is indeed a fine human being, with attractive family values.  However, Clinton supporter do not support her because she is a women, granted that is an plus for some women, but do not insult the intellegence of women whom would vote for clinton.  She is pro choice, pro civil union, pro national health care to name a few and Palin is NOT- hello women be it 40, 50 or 60 are not so simple minded ,as you portrayed in your creative writing, to vote for someone cause they are bitter, -again written in a creative way in your writing.<br />
You go on to write &#8221; think her personal charisma and the appeal of her bio will “convert” a lot of those Hillary supporters into Palin pals, and they will pull the lever for the ticket with their new identity-partner on it.&#8221;<br />
New identity partner? Clinton supporter (and it seems you think they are only women) are selecting their choice based on issues they identify with not -&#8221;oh she has kids, I have kids, she played sports, I played sports and she is pretty and has charm- YUP I&#8217;M VOTING FOR MCCAIN/PALIN TICKET&#8221;</p>
<p>Not sure but seems like you may be the Misogynist&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-535071</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-535071</guid>
		<description>I'm basing my opinion on talking with Hillary voters motivated enough to come to the party's national convention.

What's your opinion based on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m basing my opinion on talking with Hillary voters motivated enough to come to the party&#8217;s national convention.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your opinion based on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: you are clueless</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-534277</link>
		<dc:creator>you are clueless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117540#comment-534277</guid>
		<description>So out of touch with women- seriously think that any women that wanted to vote for hillary because of QUALIFICATION would want to vote for Mccain cause there is now a woman on his ticket.  Dude work it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So out of touch with women- seriously think that any women that wanted to vote for hillary because of QUALIFICATION would want to vote for Mccain cause there is now a woman on his ticket.  Dude work it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
