<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Catholic Lions Roar Against Speaker Pelosi and The Democratic Pro-Choice Platform!</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sheller</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-934151</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-934151</guid>
		<description>No roar heard. Early Native Americans heard it, in the forcing of your religious beliefs on those who didn't even speak the language the teachings were given in.  That was not very holy.  Those early missions, built with forced labor, certainly gave a hint at the future of your church inflicting its beliefs over all.  When your church opens its doors to all unwanted children, no questions asked, then you can proceed to try and dictate the procreation of the species by others.  Please don't reassign any of those troubled priests to these positions.  I don't believe any God would knowingly force the birth of a child he knew would be unwanted, abused, tortured, or unloved at the hands of their "parents".  Iowa had to quickly readjust their policy when they realized how many parents were willing to admit they could not care for their children.  But Open Your Doors to all the unwanted children your religious beliefs profess to want.  The suffering of the unwanted children of the world should not be allowed to continue, no matter how Holy you feel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No roar heard. Early Native Americans heard it, in the forcing of your religious beliefs on those who didn&#8217;t even speak the language the teachings were given in.  That was not very holy.  Those early missions, built with forced labor, certainly gave a hint at the future of your church inflicting its beliefs over all.  When your church opens its doors to all unwanted children, no questions asked, then you can proceed to try and dictate the procreation of the species by others.  Please don&#8217;t reassign any of those troubled priests to these positions.  I don&#8217;t believe any God would knowingly force the birth of a child he knew would be unwanted, abused, tortured, or unloved at the hands of their &#8220;parents&#8221;.  Iowa had to quickly readjust their policy when they realized how many parents were willing to admit they could not care for their children.  But Open Your Doors to all the unwanted children your religious beliefs profess to want.  The suffering of the unwanted children of the world should not be allowed to continue, no matter how Holy you feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old_Army_Brat</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-642436</link>
		<dc:creator>Old_Army_Brat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-642436</guid>
		<description>I didn't hear anything from this mostly Roman Catholic town that I live in... 

While don't like abortions, I do not feel that it it is the US Government's place to regulate it -- this is a religious moral not secular moral.  Our forefathers believed in separation of church and state.  Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1803 "to build a wall of separation between Church and State".   The first amendment does build this wall.  Thomas Jefferson was very religious and believed this way.  I am also very religious and believe in separation of Church and State.   No bill should be introduced to put religious morals on the books and those that are on the books should be removed from the books -- marriage laws fall in this category as these laws make it possible for religious tyranny on anybody that doesn't believe the same as you do.  Our forefathers where not the strong religious types as most people paint them to be most were either deist or agnostic.  Those that who say otherwise are history revisionist.  They came here to escape religious tyranny and were not a real part of any mainstream religion.  Mainstream religion has tried to capitalize on our forefathers by saying that the were a part of Mainstream religion.

When you have one man that runs the entire church with supreme authority and with infallibility where the living person that is the "king" cannot easily undo what previous "kings" have done as it would show the actual fallibility of the previous "kings" therefore showing the fallibility of the current "king".  The incorrect dogma grows and grows with no stopping it as it would show how invalid the whole church is.  The non-biblical dogma surrounding the Pope is enough for me not to become a Roman Catholic even though I like the liturgical service.  I thank God everyday that there are other liturgical churches which don't have this dogma.

OAB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t hear anything from this mostly Roman Catholic town that I live in&#8230; </p>
<p>While don&#8217;t like abortions, I do not feel that it it is the US Government&#8217;s place to regulate it &#8212; this is a religious moral not secular moral.  Our forefathers believed in separation of church and state.  Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1803 &#8220;to build a wall of separation between Church and State&#8221;.   The first amendment does build this wall.  Thomas Jefferson was very religious and believed this way.  I am also very religious and believe in separation of Church and State.   No bill should be introduced to put religious morals on the books and those that are on the books should be removed from the books &#8212; marriage laws fall in this category as these laws make it possible for religious tyranny on anybody that doesn&#8217;t believe the same as you do.  Our forefathers where not the strong religious types as most people paint them to be most were either deist or agnostic.  Those that who say otherwise are history revisionist.  They came here to escape religious tyranny and were not a real part of any mainstream religion.  Mainstream religion has tried to capitalize on our forefathers by saying that the were a part of Mainstream religion.</p>
<p>When you have one man that runs the entire church with supreme authority and with infallibility where the living person that is the &#8220;king&#8221; cannot easily undo what previous &#8220;kings&#8221; have done as it would show the actual fallibility of the previous &#8220;kings&#8221; therefore showing the fallibility of the current &#8220;king&#8221;.  The incorrect dogma grows and grows with no stopping it as it would show how invalid the whole church is.  The non-biblical dogma surrounding the Pope is enough for me not to become a Roman Catholic even though I like the liturgical service.  I thank God everyday that there are other liturgical churches which don&#8217;t have this dogma.</p>
<p>OAB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-528450</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-528450</guid>
		<description>Tom,

You can make some claim to improper handling of the sexual abuse scandal. The Church has consistantly opposed the war in Iraq. Pope John Paul opposed it personally in messages and audiences with Bush.

Also, the Catholic Church is not one of the strongest proponents of economic social justice (and provider of services to the needy) in America today. Undocumented immigrants in the Southwest have their strongest ally in the Church both spirtually, and tangibly. 

If you can find a Bishop in the Country who teaches that the economic structure of America is just and sound I'll give you an internet arguement dollar.

I'm sorry the silence is deafening you, but I suspect the problem is not the Church.

Tom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>You can make some claim to improper handling of the sexual abuse scandal. The Church has consistantly opposed the war in Iraq. Pope John Paul opposed it personally in messages and audiences with Bush.</p>
<p>Also, the Catholic Church is not one of the strongest proponents of economic social justice (and provider of services to the needy) in America today. Undocumented immigrants in the Southwest have their strongest ally in the Church both spirtually, and tangibly. </p>
<p>If you can find a Bishop in the Country who teaches that the economic structure of America is just and sound I&#8217;ll give you an internet arguement dollar.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry the silence is deafening you, but I suspect the problem is not the Church.</p>
<p>Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Evarist</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-522774</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Evarist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-522774</guid>
		<description>"Quo usque tandem abutere, "Pelosi", nostra patientia" ..... excerpt from Cicero's Catiline Orations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Quo usque tandem abutere, &#8220;Pelosi&#8221;, nostra patientia&#8221; &#8230;.. excerpt from Cicero&#8217;s Catiline Orations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom raterman</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-522257</link>
		<dc:creator>tom raterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-522257</guid>
		<description>I am also a catholic and agree that Catholic teaching was misrepresented. Should it be challenged is another question. It is astonishing that the bishops have the hubris to speak in public about sexual matters after their dismal (criminal?) record of aiding and abetting sexual predators. If the catholic bishops want to be a credible moral force in American politics, they should now speak about the immorality of the Iraq war, American poverty, lack of universal health care, etc. Their silence is deafening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also a catholic and agree that Catholic teaching was misrepresented. Should it be challenged is another question. It is astonishing that the bishops have the hubris to speak in public about sexual matters after their dismal (criminal?) record of aiding and abetting sexual predators. If the catholic bishops want to be a credible moral force in American politics, they should now speak about the immorality of the Iraq war, American poverty, lack of universal health care, etc. Their silence is deafening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: God</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-518514</link>
		<dc:creator>God</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-518514</guid>
		<description>too many abortions would reduce the supply of children to the priesthood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too many abortions would reduce the supply of children to the priesthood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-517285</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117454#comment-517285</guid>
		<description>I didn't hear anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t hear anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

