Yesterday the University of San Diego rejected the appointment of a pro-choice candidate for the position of theology professor at the university. Moral sobriety is coming back to the Catholic educational institutions slowly in the United States as Catholic institutions and educators realize there is definitively no room for any interpretive flexibility in following the Church’s teachings on the sanctity of human life. Since the papal visit in April to the United States it is becoming very clear that academic freedom in Catholic educational facilities does not include the right to disagree with fundamental Church teachings on any moral , social or ethical level.
Dr. Ruether is a member of, “Catholics for Choice,†a group that routinely looks to offer alternative moral outlooks and positions on such issues as gay rights, same sex marriages, birth control and the rights of women to procure abortions in opposition to Catholic moral teachings. Another issue that is commonly raised by the group is the right Catholic women have to ordination to the priesthood. The Church has consistently taught against this possibility from happening.
The central issue of the matter seems really to center around the ability for Catholics to hold an opinion that is contrary to the opinion of the Church. Since the pontificate of John Paul II, anyone that teaches at a Catholic educational institution has been required to publically declare they will not deviate from Church teachings in the classroom. The oath of fidelity applies to not only the public profession of the Catholic faith in the classroom, but applies to the everyday activities of Catholics everywhere. The bottom line is simply this; Catholic moral teaching is intertwined with the daily lives of faithful Catholics, and adherence to Catholic teachings across the spectrum of faith is simply not optional.
The decision of the University of San Diego to retract the offer of employment to Dr. Ruether is a genuine indication that the American Catholic Church is serious about its campaign to come into line with the universal teachings of the Church. While the general populace is sometimes not in accord with the decisions of the hierarchy, moves such as this one in the Golden State are clearly indicative of the influential message Benedict XVI wields to bring the American flock back to the global fold of traditional Catholicism.
The rejection of Dr. Ruether should also be considered an substantial victory for Pro-life Catholics as they gather support for the political opposition to candidates that proclaim political rhetoric that is contrary to Catholic moral and ethical teachings as well. The Catholic voter influence is a strong one in this upcoming political election period and the battle lines are indeed drawn over Pro-life & Pro-choice issues involving the candidates.
The final appreciation of this rejection is also very definitive. Catholics cannot in any way shape or form embrace political, social or moral stances that are contrary or undermine Catholic teachings. Holding such positions clearly isolates such nominal Catholics from full participation in the Holy Eucharist and requires a true conversion of conscience and reconciliation before they receive any Catholic sacraments. The issue also makes another point very obvious and clear; if you are not totally in union with the teachings of the Universal Church please look for a job somewhere else. Catholic educational, social, pastoral and religious institutions really deserve only faithful believers working in these places. If you are against Catholic teachings on same sex marriages, women’s ordination, birth control, abortion, et cetera, please take your contrarian opinions else where and allow Catholicism to continue effectively preach its moral and ethical message to the world. We don’t need academics undermining the Divine message the Church offers to the world.
Hugh McNichol is a Catholic author and journalist that writes on Catholic topics and issues. Hugh studied both philosophy and theology at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary in Philadelphia. He writes daily at: http://verbumcarofactumest.blogspot.com & http://catholicsacredarts.com & http://pewsitter.com He writes about Irish Catholic experiences at http://graysferrygrapevine.blogspot.com  Comments are always welcome @ hugh.mcnichol@trinettc.com













(6 votes, average: 4.33 out of 5)

1 user commented in " Cantankerous Catholics Need Not Apply! "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackThis is welcome news. I hope that pro-choice Catholic lay persons will not also be allowed to receive the Eucharist in Catholic University chapels.
Archbishop Raymond Burke in his recent interview with Radici Cristiane, (Lifesites News 19.08.2008) has said that the Eucharist should not be given to pro-abortion politicians in mortal sin. It is a sacrilege. He is saying that Eucharistic Ministers, priests and bishops are participating in this sacrilege.(Veritatis Splendor 55,56,68,70,81 etc and Catechism of the Catholic Church 1751,1756).
The new head of the Apostolic Signatura, the highest court in the Vatican is saying that a sacrilege needs to be stopped.
According to Canon Law a juridical person (Rector, Superior, Bishop) needs to be a Catholic.
A Juridical Person who commits a sacrilege and does not make amends is not in communion with Jesus and His Mystical Body the Church. He is not a Catholic canonically and spiritually.
He needs to publicly make amends and go for Confession, to restore Sanctifying Grace and be in communion with Jesus.
The lay Eucharistic Minister may not be a juridical person. However this is not true of others-participating, in the sacrilege and mortal sin-in Washington, San Francisco and Boston.
Secondly if a Bishop does not affirm publicly that that non-Catholics need Catholic Faith and the Baptism of water, for salvation -he is contradicting the Nicene and the Apostles Creed and the First Commandment. This is a first class heresy.
This issue could also be clarified with the Signatura in Rome and its head, the American, Archbishop Raymond Burke.Also attention needs to be brought to lay Catholics, who are pro abortion or against the other teachings of the Church (e.g salvation) and who yet receive the Eucharist at Holy Mass.
Leave A Reply