Comments on: John, Elizabeth Edwards: New Info Casts Doubts on Couple’s Claim Affair Ended in 2006

By: kay

kay — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:01:09 +0000

From I read, he told Elizabeth New Year Eve, which mean she did not have a Happy New Year beginning for 2007. Reille, told a reporter that she was fired because of Elizabeth a few weeks into 2007. Until he can prove that baby is not his, this is never going to rest, either that or all of you reporters find out what his schedule was at the beginning of 05/2007 because people, that is the magic month for the next long nine months until 02/27/08. So if everyone is so bent on ripping the man and his family to pieces check his schedule for each day of 05/2007. Then start using your fingers to calculate.

By: CC

CC — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:25:51 +0000

When everybody laughed at Lady de Rothschild, for calling Barrack Obama the E-Word, she kind of dropped from sight, leaving her partner, Amy Siskind, to take a turn as HRC’s hit-woman. Well, she did go back to London, England, where she proceeded to call Obama the E-word again, this time from out of the country.

Course you’ve got Susan Estrich comparing John Edwards’ conduct to Russia’s invasion of Georgia, while pretending that the stain Bill Clinton left on Monica Lewinsky’s dress was his one and only assignation. She also lists the reasons why Bill Clinton was entitled.

I think that it was terribly unkind for Clinton’s people to intimidate the Edwards family as they have. Elizabeth Edwards is dying, if she wants to live out the last year or so of her life with her eyes glued shut, and her thumbs in her ears, well then that shouldn’t be any less her prerogative as it remains Hillary Clinton’s. The Edwards family have things to get in order. Plans for their children’s futures, and precious little time to waste watching high-toned hypocrites showcase their schadenfreude. Elizabeth Edwards might have had something interesting to say at the convention, but we won’t hear her voice, as she’s unlikely to go. Her children will soon have only their father, they’re going to need him.

It’s hardly the first time a family dealing with a big, scary, crisis came together, and when the crisis began to ebb, somebody went and did the wrong thing. Is he getting a little cute with the details? Probably. But I’m guessing. I have my own problems, and no dog in that fight.

I don’t think that it’s too much to ask, when playing the hypocrisy card, that a little logic be included.

By: jjwiththevajayjay

jjwiththevajayjay — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:18:48 +0000

Reille Hunter, aka, Lisa Druck is the 2008 Jennifer Flowers/Bill Clinton mess.

Essh. What is with these politicians? It seems they cannot keep it in their pants but some other woman’s pants.

What is with the name change from Lisa Druck to Reille Hunter? What Reille Manhunter and Reille Cheater taken?

Well a baby was born out of this mess.
I will refrain from asking who is your daddy?

Ladies please take note Ms. Hunter may eyeball your husband. Great!

By: Candace

Candace — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:38:54 +0000

Elizabeth should sue JE for divorce now and lay claim to all their possession before she succumbs to her incurable disease. This will ensure her children’s future and she can go with a peace of mind. If she doesn’t, everything will go to JE and whoever he decides to marry in the future. If this “love child” is really his, then it’s another fraction of her children’s inheritance. How sad. Come on Elizabeth - WAKE UP and think of your children!!!

By: Angela Cagle

Angela Cagle — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:06:21 +0000

“Sorry? My Backside!!” Read Anna N. Mosses’ views on John Edwards. Her article is the Radical Republican However, this problem is bipartisan, and she sympathizes with wife and dem party.

By: Cherubim

Cherubim — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:02:09 +0000

John Edwards took my donation, and said he would help in the fight to end proverty, and
I sincerely hope John and Elizabeth will continue to do so.
By the way, I don’t want my donation back, because some how I feel
the New World Order corporations are the only ones who benefit from
silencing John Edwards. When you are ready John and Elizabeth to rejoin
the fight to end proverty and obtain National Health Care
let me know and I’ll send you another donation.

By: Pie

Pie — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:54:50 +0000

Remember, Elizabeth said John told the truth slowly! Maybe John hasn’t finished coughing up the rest of the story. Regardless the affair, it appears John Edwards has been attempting to misrepresent facts. We have all had enough of that recently!

By: Duh

Duh — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:09:09 +0000

One more thing: Maybe Jolhn started it when E. wsas in remission (how sensitive of him! so does that mean if your spouse is cancer-free you have a green light John?) but given the cancer came back in the spring of 2007 I’d bet the stress of dealing with her husband’s adultery had something to do with it coming back. It can’t be GOOD for a cancer survivor to be put through something like this by the person they depend on most as a partner.

By: Duh

Duh — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:05:29 +0000

Good Grief! All these words for something so simple! Find out the DATE that Rielle Hunter was fired from her “job” on the Edwards campaign. That will tell you when poor Elizabeth found out and the date when Elizabeth believed he camed clean.

I can’t believe you are turning something so obvious into such a huge mystery. And no of course it wsasn’t 2006– probably early 2007.