“[Edwards] used the interview to play the Supermarket Tabloid Credibility Card to trash his nemesis, The National Equirer.”
–DBKP’s LBG,
John Edwards Statement:
* No Mention of “Rielle Hunter” to be Found
* Taking “Full Responsibility” Doesn’t Include Admission of Guilt
Mainstream Media: “Admits”, “Lied” and “Affair” in Most Headlines–But Those Words Not Found in Edwards’ Statement
No Mention of “Lied”, “Affair” or “Rielle Hunter” during Nightline Interview Either
“I was and am ashamed of my conduct and choices, and I had hoped that it would never become public. With my family, I took responsibility for my actions in 2006 and today I take full responsibility publicly. But that misconduct took place for a short period in 2006.”
–John Edwards, August 8, 2008 Statement
“One question which immediately comes to mind: What was Edwards doing leaving the Beverly Hilton at 2:40 in the morning, visiting a woman he says he did not love and her baby, which he says he did not father?”
–DBKP: John Edwards Scandal: Edwards Admits Affair, Lies, to ABC News
If admission is the first of the twelve steps toward recovery, did John Edwards take that first step during his appearance on ABC’s Nightline?
Questions remain after reading Edwards’ press statement or watching his performance on ABC’s Nightline.
Edwards’ announcement may prove to raise more questions than it answered.
Edwards’ statement alleges that he has “given a complete interview on this matter” and “will have nothing more to say”. Was this part of the statement an attempt to enable Edwards to appear at the Democrat National Convention without being dogged by pesky reporters’ questions?
Are “have already given a complete interview on this matter” and “have nothing more to say” today’s substitute for yesterday’s failed answers of “tabloid trash” and “lies”?
One guess: The National Enquirer–who wields a far better record of veracity on this subject than Edwards–might have something to say about whether Edwards revisits the topic in the future.
|
ALSO at DBKP:
|
Edwards claims he was 99% honest. Yet, he leaves the specifics of that 99% to the reader’s imagination–as well as the remaining 1%. There’s a lot that has to be shoe-horned into that 1%.
As LBG points out [John Edwards Scandal: Edwards Defends Affair with Supermarket Tabloid Credibility Card ]:
The MSM claimed Edwards “fessed†up to “lying†about the affair.
“Edwards: Although I was honest in every painful detail with my family, I did not tell the public.â€
“I did not tell the public†is an omission, not an admission of lying. Remember, Edwards knew exactly the impact each and every word he chose to use when arguing his case before the public on Nightline.
LBG goes on to explain.
Continue reading: John Edwards Scandal: Edwards Statement, Interview Admits Little
by Mondoreb
Source: John Edwards Scandal: Edwards Statement, Interview Admits Little
Mondoreb blogs at Death By 1000 Papercuts. Interested readers can e-mail him at
mondoreb@gmail.com. All DBKP stories are filed under Mondoreb at BNN.



















3 users commented in " John Edwards Scandal: Edwards Admits Little, No Mention of Rielle Hunter "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackAndrew Young of the John Edwards story: The arrests for worthless checks, DWI, burglary, criminal mischief, the federal tax lien
webofdeception.com
Sex and the Suffragettes
I admire Elizabeth Edwards and Hillary Clinton for standing by their men.
Thanks to the suffragettes, women have choices in their lives. They didn’t have to stay – they wanted to.
Politicians will be politicians, and I think political wives know that their husbands will face a plethora of ‘opportunities’ to cheat.
The ones who really suffer are the mistresses. Imagine what Rielle Hunter’s life is going to be like.
Probably about as dreadfully bleak as the ‘outed’ mistresses of Bill Clinton, Woodrow Wilson and Warren Harding.
One of these presidents had a love child while running for office, and believe it or not, that actually helped women win the vote.
Most people are totally in the dark about HOW the suffragettes won.
Now finding out the sexy, shocking truth is as easy as opening your e-mail.
“The Privilege of Voting” is a new e-mail series that follows eight great women from 1912-1920 to reveal ALL that happened to set the stage for women to win the vote.
Two beautiful and extremely powerful suffragettes — Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst are featured, along with Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan, Alice Roosevelt and two gorgeous presidential mistresses.
There is a ton of heartache, and a LOT of hot affairs on the rocky road to the ballot box.
Presented in a unique sequential e-mail series — each exciting episode is about 10 minutes – perfect to enjoy during coffeebreaks, or anytime.
Subscribe free at
http://www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/tpovpage.html
Gitmo which is horrendously old news will likely get more news coverage over the next two years than the Edwards story will, because leftists would rather attack their own country over and over and over and over than make a single one of their own accountable for anything.
Liberals will be in downplay mode, eager to get back to trashing their own country – saying:
“Poor Edwards’ family. They must really be hurting right now. Now let’s get back to talking about how horrible America is…and how Conservatives are to blame – never minding the fact that liberals have been in control of congress for how long?.”
That is the difference….
When a conservative messes up, other conservatives pressure the idiot out of whatever office they hold or hope to hold. Conservatives don’t start making excuses, yipping again about 6 year old stories designed to announce to the world how much they hate their country.
When a liberal lies, cheats, pays off a mistress and insults others in the process – well then liberals immediately go into all the reasons why it’s no big deal.
Well here’s a news flash for the wild eyed, protest giddy leftist who seems to think this isn’t a big deal….. this story is not going away in a week.. or two… or three….Why?
Because Edwards is STILL lying about half the story… He lies even when he “supposedly” is coming clean. Of course Clinton really said it best – it all depends on what the definition of “is” is……
Danny Vice
http://www.theweeklyvice.com
Leave A Reply