<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Edwards Scandal: DailyKOS Readers Informed of Scandal; Others Remain in Dark</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Comrade  Stalin</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-450099</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade  Stalin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-450099</guid>
		<description>Now Hear This! Now Hear This!

You are all hereby ordered to stop all these post about John Edwards !!!
Only Republican scandals can be discussed on this blog. Comrade Edwards is a friend of the workers and any criticism of him makes you "an enemy of the people" ! This means  a one way trip to the GULAG.
So Stop it now!!!!


Brother Stalin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now Hear This! Now Hear This!</p>
<p>You are all hereby ordered to stop all these post about John Edwards !!!<br />
Only Republican scandals can be discussed on this blog. Comrade Edwards is a friend of the workers and any criticism of him makes you &#8220;an enemy of the people&#8221; ! This means  a one way trip to the GULAG.<br />
So Stop it now!!!!</p>
<p>Brother Stalin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hadenuf</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-448495</link>
		<dc:creator>hadenuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-448495</guid>
		<description>I live in Chapel Hill, was an Edwards supporter, and I readily admit that I'm very curious--neither sad nor angry nor overprotective of him-- about this story.

However, I think it IS news:  were campaign funds used to provide his alleged mistress with a job?  Will he campaign for Obama in NC, a state which hasn't gone democratic since Carter?  Will he serve in an Obama administration?

This "scandal" will dog him unless he deals with it maturely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Chapel Hill, was an Edwards supporter, and I readily admit that I&#8217;m very curious&#8211;neither sad nor angry nor overprotective of him&#8211; about this story.</p>
<p>However, I think it IS news:  were campaign funds used to provide his alleged mistress with a job?  Will he campaign for Obama in NC, a state which hasn&#8217;t gone democratic since Carter?  Will he serve in an Obama administration?</p>
<p>This &#8220;scandal&#8221; will dog him unless he deals with it maturely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Stranahan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-448308</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Stranahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-448308</guid>
		<description>Mike - your point about Haggard is well taken. Reporters HAVE been looking for the claimed father Andrew Young - they can't find him, for two weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - your point about Haggard is well taken. Reporters HAVE been looking for the claimed father Andrew Young - they can&#8217;t find him, for two weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-448282</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-448282</guid>
		<description>Just as someone had removed Rielle Hunter's website, beingisfree.org, from the Internet back in 2007 (save for that Egyptian mirror site of the San Francisco based Internet  Archive, archive.org, that the person who had removed all other traces of beingisfree.org apparently didn't know was still there until its existence began being discussed on the Internet/blogosphere by late July 2008, "Simon Scowl" of Deceiver.com notes that:

"as of 1:45 PM EST (8/3/07) today, that mirror site of Being Is Free is gone. Noticing a pattern here? Luckily, I already saved every single page to my hard drive…

Seems like that someone who had tried to remove all traces of beingisfree.org all those months ago is trying to remove as much about Rielle from the Internet yet again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as someone had removed Rielle Hunter&#8217;s website, beingisfree.org, from the Internet back in 2007 (save for that Egyptian mirror site of the San Francisco based Internet  Archive, archive.org, that the person who had removed all other traces of beingisfree.org apparently didn&#8217;t know was still there until its existence began being discussed on the Internet/blogosphere by late July 2008, &#8220;Simon Scowl&#8221; of Deceiver.com notes that:</p>
<p>&#8220;as of 1:45 PM EST (8/3/07) today, that mirror site of Being Is Free is gone. Noticing a pattern here? Luckily, I already saved every single page to my hard drive…</p>
<p>Seems like that someone who had tried to remove all traces of beingisfree.org all those months ago is trying to remove as much about Rielle from the Internet yet again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike f</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-448195</link>
		<dc:creator>mike f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-448195</guid>
		<description>Remember how the Ted Haggard scandal turned out to be such a huge story in the MSM? It wasn't just a "private" matter back then. No, it was portrayed as evidence of the widespread hypocrisy of Christian leaders. Haggard preached against gay marriage and he ended up being a hypocrite. That was certainly newsworthy, and the MSM had no problem reporting on it day after day. How is the Edwards scandal any different? In his campaign, he kept bringing up how great a marriage he had, and we kept hearing glowing stories about how he and Elizabeth had their anniversary dinner at Wendy's every year. And in a debate moderated by Katie Couric, he was asked about the importance of marital fidelity, and he gave an answer that now seems extremely hypocritical. And if Ted Haggard was a national figure, how much more is John Edwards? It's completely absurd that no one in the MSM is reporting this story or checking out the facts. (Why haven't we seen anyone seek out the guy claiming to be the real father?) This is pure BIAS, plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember how the Ted Haggard scandal turned out to be such a huge story in the MSM? It wasn&#8217;t just a &#8220;private&#8221; matter back then. No, it was portrayed as evidence of the widespread hypocrisy of Christian leaders. Haggard preached against gay marriage and he ended up being a hypocrite. That was certainly newsworthy, and the MSM had no problem reporting on it day after day. How is the Edwards scandal any different? In his campaign, he kept bringing up how great a marriage he had, and we kept hearing glowing stories about how he and Elizabeth had their anniversary dinner at Wendy&#8217;s every year. And in a debate moderated by Katie Couric, he was asked about the importance of marital fidelity, and he gave an answer that now seems extremely hypocritical. And if Ted Haggard was a national figure, how much more is John Edwards? It&#8217;s completely absurd that no one in the MSM is reporting this story or checking out the facts. (Why haven&#8217;t we seen anyone seek out the guy claiming to be the real father?) This is pure BIAS, plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Stranahan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-447780</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Stranahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-447780</guid>
		<description>Actually, I was banned.

And there are solid facts, as I point out.

I'm a long standing member of DKos. I was insulted and threatened and finally banned for saying what's being reported in publications like the San Jose Mercury News.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I was banned.</p>
<p>And there are solid facts, as I point out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a long standing member of DKos. I was insulted and threatened and finally banned for saying what&#8217;s being reported in publications like the San Jose Mercury News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bettync</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-447626</link>
		<dc:creator>bettync</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-447626</guid>
		<description>Your headline may be misleading to some people. Lee Stranahan has posted his diaries at Daily Kos, but let's be clear that anyone may post a diary at Kos. Stranahan has no affiliation with Daily Kos owner or editors. He merely posts as a new member.

So far, other members of Daily Kos have shown a very unfavorable view of Stranahan's diaries. 

In his last diary, he received so many negative ratings that he was close to the point of being banned from further comments. He will probably find a much more receptive audience at conservative websites.

Kos readers are skeptical of conclusions made from allegation and speculative conclusions alone. They like solid facts over there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your headline may be misleading to some people. Lee Stranahan has posted his diaries at Daily Kos, but let&#8217;s be clear that anyone may post a diary at Kos. Stranahan has no affiliation with Daily Kos owner or editors. He merely posts as a new member.</p>
<p>So far, other members of Daily Kos have shown a very unfavorable view of Stranahan&#8217;s diaries. </p>
<p>In his last diary, he received so many negative ratings that he was close to the point of being banned from further comments. He will probably find a much more receptive audience at conservative websites.</p>
<p>Kos readers are skeptical of conclusions made from allegation and speculative conclusions alone. They like solid facts over there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibsAreHypocrites</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-446965</link>
		<dc:creator>LibsAreHypocrites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 03:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-446965</guid>
		<description>Something tells me,Alessan,that if this were a Republican politician,you would not have any problem with everyone sticking their noses into this business. And just how do you know that it was a one night stand? Sheesh,what a dumbass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something tells me,Alessan,that if this were a Republican politician,you would not have any problem with everyone sticking their noses into this business. And just how do you know that it was a one night stand? Sheesh,what a dumbass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-446737</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/117040#comment-446737</guid>
		<description>You people are a bunch nosey creeps. It's simply none of your business, the girl doesn't have to admit to you the father is if she doesn't want to. Leave the matter alone, I sure the child will be well taken care of, this women is not poor. Why are you covering a 
one night stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people are a bunch nosey creeps. It&#8217;s simply none of your business, the girl doesn&#8217;t have to admit to you the father is if she doesn&#8217;t want to. Leave the matter alone, I sure the child will be well taken care of, this women is not poor. Why are you covering a<br />
one night stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
