Lee Stranahan Gets it Right
Edwards Acting Like He has “Something to hide”
Most Americans Kept in the Dark by MSM Gatekeepers
Lee Stranahan, at DailyKOS [Irrefutable Proof Of The John Edwards Scandal] does a good job of breaking the news to the left that the John Edwards scandal is real.
On Wednesday, after his speech to the AARP, John Edwards ducked out a side entrance in order to avoid reporter’s questions.
That’s a fact. It’s well sourced — a dozen reporters were there. Nobody is disputing it. And to anyone covering the story, it’s hugely significant for two reasons; it’s damning on it’s own and it shows a pattern of behavior that gives credence to the National Enquirers reporting.
First point - Edwards is acting how people act when they are hiding something.
Think like a journalist, not a John Edwards supporter. Why do politicians avoid reporters, not issue statements, and duck an issue that multiple news outlets are running down? The answer is - always, in every case - because they have something to hide.
Sadly–for those who wish that politicians, both left and right, would act in the better interests of the country, instead of themselves–the scandal is not about a “right wing conspiracy” or even an evil plot of the Clintons. It’s not even about a politician who cheated on his cancer-stricken wife while he dragged her onto the campaign trail in search of the brass ring of the presidency.
To DBKP, it’s about the utter and abject failure of the traditional press.
It’s not a failure to investigate, although that occurred (and is occurring as I write this).
It’s a failure by MSM editors and gatekeepers to report knowledge to their “subjects”. Readers of Stranahans’ KOS diary know about the affair. They may discuss it, vehemently object to the recording of it by Stranahan at KOS or heartily agree that Edwards is a slimy specimen of humanity.
BUT, at least the readers of KOS can debate these points.
For those that are condemned to get their information through the NY Times, CNN or the 3 network newscasts, they don’t even get the opportunity to decide for themselves: that decision was taken away by a mainstream press that made their decision for them.
Even though there was plenty of “curious coincidences” back in December, when the National Enquirer released their second story on the Edwards affair [JOHN EDWARDS LOVE CHILD SCANDAL!], not one reporter had the balls to ask Edwards about it.
Now, seven months later, there are some who supported John Edwards who feel blind-sided by the news that a now-grudging MSM is forced to report. That wouldn’t have happened if just one MSM reporter had asked Edwards back in December–as DBKP kept imploring at the time–”Do you deny that you’ve been in telephone contact with Rielle Hunter since she found out that she was pregnant?”
We’ll assume for a moment that the MSM has no liberal bias. The fact that most people who consume MSM news are just now finding this out should be alarming. Readers of the NY Times and viewers of CNN–as well as millions others–are still clueless about John Edwards, Rielle Hunter and their love child.
They remain in the dark to the elaborate cover-up by the Edwards campaign as well.
The cover-up by the traditional press will be the real story here. MSM apologists are already scrambling for excuses. We looked at how the KC Star let their readers in on the new yesterday [John Edwards Scandal: KC Writer Cites “Veiled Threats”, Denials as Likely
].
KC Star writer, Aaron Barnhart, explained it all away as deference to “EE”; as in, “Elizabeth Edwards is the real reason this story hasn’t gained traction until now.” Barnhart also attributes non-coverage to “vigorous denials” and “veiled threats” to toss the curious off the Edwards press bus.
The Enquirer reported in their latest print edition that:
Elizabeth Edwards was in Chicago raising cancer awareness with Lance Armstrong on the night the ENQUIRER caught her husband visiting Rielle Hunter visiting their love child [at the Beverly Hilton].
Remember the phrase “gained traction”: you’ll likely hear it a lot. It’s MSMspeak for “failure to inform our readers/viewers”.
Note to John McCain and Barack Obama: If a reporter asks about–or is thinking about asking–unpleasantness, tell them they may have their access cut off. Or, have your staff issue a “vigorous denial”. That ought to fix the problem–with the major networks and the NY Times, Newsweek and Time magazine, anyway.
Back in December, DBKP looked at Bob Schieffer, of CBS’s Face the Nation, and his “two-denial rule”. [The Edwards Scandal, The Press, The Enquirer and the Blogosphere]
Well, you know I saw that this morning. I believe that — I believe that’s a story that we will be avoiding, because it appears to me that there’s absolutely nothing to it. I’m told that another — a man says that the child is his. I’m told that the woman who seems to be pregnant says it’s not his. So I guess — I guess we’re going to pass on that. Unless you come up with some new information on this, Don.
–- Schieffer, when asked about the John Edwards-Rielle Hunter story On the Don Imus show
What DBKP said then still applies:
A presidential candidate and his campaign’s mysterious video: one that was produced with the high hopes of making the candidate better-known, only to have that hope fulfilled when it disappeared from public view.
That doesn’t excite Bob Schieffer.
A presidential candidate who isn’t asked by the press if he denies being in phone contact with his alleged mistress since she discovered she’s pregnant. Indeed, the Mainstream press didn’t go postal: they went Emily Post-al, as in, “let’s not make any waves, that’s not polite; might get us thrown out of the candidate’s press tent.”
That doesn’t excite Bob Schieffer.
Did anything about the Edwards’ story excite Bob Schieffer?
Continue reading: John Edwards Scandal: DailyKOS Readers Now Know; Others Remain In the Dark
by Mondoreb
Source: John Edwards Scandal: DailyKOS Readers Now Know; Others Remain In the DarkMondoreb blogs at Death By 1000 Papercuts. Interested readers can e-mail him at
mondoreb@gmail.com. All DBKP stories are filed under Mondoreb at BNN.















(6 votes, average: 4 out of 5)

9 users commented in " John Edwards Scandal: DailyKOS Readers Informed of Scandal; Others Remain in Dark "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackYou people are a bunch nosey creeps. It’s simply none of your business, the girl doesn’t have to admit to you the father is if she doesn’t want to. Leave the matter alone, I sure the child will be well taken care of, this women is not poor. Why are you covering a
one night stand.
Something tells me,Alessan,that if this were a Republican politician,you would not have any problem with everyone sticking their noses into this business. And just how do you know that it was a one night stand? Sheesh,what a dumbass.
Your headline may be misleading to some people. Lee Stranahan has posted his diaries at Daily Kos, but let’s be clear that anyone may post a diary at Kos. Stranahan has no affiliation with Daily Kos owner or editors. He merely posts as a new member.
So far, other members of Daily Kos have shown a very unfavorable view of Stranahan’s diaries.
In his last diary, he received so many negative ratings that he was close to the point of being banned from further comments. He will probably find a much more receptive audience at conservative websites.
Kos readers are skeptical of conclusions made from allegation and speculative conclusions alone. They like solid facts over there!
Actually, I was banned.
And there are solid facts, as I point out.
I’m a long standing member of DKos. I was insulted and threatened and finally banned for saying what’s being reported in publications like the San Jose Mercury News.
Remember how the Ted Haggard scandal turned out to be such a huge story in the MSM? It wasn’t just a “private” matter back then. No, it was portrayed as evidence of the widespread hypocrisy of Christian leaders. Haggard preached against gay marriage and he ended up being a hypocrite. That was certainly newsworthy, and the MSM had no problem reporting on it day after day. How is the Edwards scandal any different? In his campaign, he kept bringing up how great a marriage he had, and we kept hearing glowing stories about how he and Elizabeth had their anniversary dinner at Wendy’s every year. And in a debate moderated by Katie Couric, he was asked about the importance of marital fidelity, and he gave an answer that now seems extremely hypocritical. And if Ted Haggard was a national figure, how much more is John Edwards? It’s completely absurd that no one in the MSM is reporting this story or checking out the facts. (Why haven’t we seen anyone seek out the guy claiming to be the real father?) This is pure BIAS, plain and simple.
Just as someone had removed Rielle Hunter’s website, beingisfree.org, from the Internet back in 2007 (save for that Egyptian mirror site of the San Francisco based Internet Archive, archive.org, that the person who had removed all other traces of beingisfree.org apparently didn’t know was still there until its existence began being discussed on the Internet/blogosphere by late July 2008, “Simon Scowl” of Deceiver.com notes that:
“as of 1:45 PM EST (8/3/07) today, that mirror site of Being Is Free is gone. Noticing a pattern here? Luckily, I already saved every single page to my hard drive…
Seems like that someone who had tried to remove all traces of beingisfree.org all those months ago is trying to remove as much about Rielle from the Internet yet again…
Mike - your point about Haggard is well taken. Reporters HAVE been looking for the claimed father Andrew Young - they can’t find him, for two weeks.
I live in Chapel Hill, was an Edwards supporter, and I readily admit that I’m very curious–neither sad nor angry nor overprotective of him– about this story.
However, I think it IS news: were campaign funds used to provide his alleged mistress with a job? Will he campaign for Obama in NC, a state which hasn’t gone democratic since Carter? Will he serve in an Obama administration?
This “scandal” will dog him unless he deals with it maturely.
Now Hear This! Now Hear This!
You are all hereby ordered to stop all these post about John Edwards !!!
Only Republican scandals can be discussed on this blog. Comrade Edwards is a friend of the workers and any criticism of him makes you “an enemy of the people” ! This means a one way trip to the GULAG.
So Stop it now!!!!
Brother Stalin
Leave A Reply