<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Liberal Image for Benedict XVI for His Trip to Australia; But Is It Accurate?</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/116700</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rev. Ray Dubuque</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/116700#comment-427218</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. Ray Dubuque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/116700#comment-427218</guid>
		<description>"New Liberal Image for Benedict XVI" is perfectly accurate if the emphasis is on the word "image". At heart, Ratzinger is as conservative as a Catholic power-player can be. But he may have learned the value good PR from his actor predecessor.  See what all the PR is attempting to hide at my  http://JesusWouldBeFurious.Org/ site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;New Liberal Image for Benedict XVI&#8221; is perfectly accurate if the emphasis is on the word &#8220;image&#8221;. At heart, Ratzinger is as conservative as a Catholic power-player can be. But he may have learned the value good PR from his actor predecessor.  See what all the PR is attempting to hide at my  <a href="http://JesusWouldBeFurious.Org/" rel="nofollow">http://JesusWouldBeFurious.Org/</a> site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
