Comments on: Baazee.com Case Update http://www.bloggernews.net/115967 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:02:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: naavi http://www.bloggernews.net/115967#comment-362477 naavi Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:47:23 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/115967#comment-362477 In partial modification of the earlier report on the Baazee.com case, it is now clarified in a new report at Indlaw that the case against the corporate entity of Baazee.com continues with charges under IPC Sections 292(2) (a) [Selling] and 292 (2)(d) [Advertising] along with Section 67 of ITA 2000. Charges under Section 294 [Obscene songs and Acts] on the Company has been dropped. However, charges on Mr Avnish Bajaj under Section 292 of IPC as an individual has been dropped. The charges under Section 67 of ITA 2000 read with Section 85 of the ITA 2000 as applicable to individuals will remain. The earlier posting of 29th May which was based on a news report as it appeared in thaiindian.com and techtree.com stands corrected. In partial modification of the earlier report on the Baazee.com case, it is now clarified in a new report at Indlaw that the case against the corporate entity of Baazee.com continues with charges under IPC Sections 292(2) (a) [Selling] and 292 (2)(d) [Advertising] along with Section 67 of ITA 2000.

Charges under Section 294 [Obscene songs and Acts] on the Company has been dropped.

However, charges on Mr Avnish Bajaj under Section 292 of IPC as an individual has been dropped.

The charges under Section 67 of ITA 2000 read with Section 85 of the ITA 2000 as applicable to individuals will remain.

The earlier posting of 29th May which was based on a news report as it appeared in thaiindian.com and techtree.com stands corrected.

]]>