<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: 10 Books That Screwed Up the World By Benjamin Wiker PHD</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115897</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julien Peter Benney</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115897#comment-1384892</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Peter Benney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115897#comment-1384892</guid>
		<description>On "alternative Garden of Eden" that I have long noted Wiker to ignore (ironically, perhaps, given that until I heard it read I often pronounced his surname like "wicca") is that of the prehistoric matriarchal paradise based around the "Great Goddess". It is an idea probably best known today from Marija Gimbutas' "Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe" and discovered by me from the brilliant but ridiculous "The First Sex" by Elizabeth Gould Davis.

The two books Wiker could have included to cover this are Jules Michelet's "La Socière" of 1863 and Johann Bachofen's "Myth, Religion and Mother-Right" of 1861. Bachofen might be particularly valuable as a choice since he influenced Engels' conception of the family, but Michelet was arguably more influential on more modern figures like Gimbutas and Gloria Steinem.

Merely looking at ordinary human ecology books made me severely suspicious of matriarchal prehistory without reading serious critiques - in a manner absent with ideas Wiker does discuss. Also, Wiccan and other neopagan religions are most popular in the very nation - the US - that remains least secularised. If he knows this, Wiker might believe or recognise goddess-based religions as an inessential component of the decline of Christianity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On &#8220;alternative Garden of Eden&#8221; that I have long noted Wiker to ignore (ironically, perhaps, given that until I heard it read I often pronounced his surname like &#8220;wicca&#8221;) is that of the prehistoric matriarchal paradise based around the &#8220;Great Goddess&#8221;. It is an idea probably best known today from Marija Gimbutas&#8217; &#8220;Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe&#8221; and discovered by me from the brilliant but ridiculous &#8220;The First Sex&#8221; by Elizabeth Gould Davis.</p>
<p>The two books Wiker could have included to cover this are Jules Michelet&#8217;s &#8220;La Socière&#8221; of 1863 and Johann Bachofen&#8217;s &#8220;Myth, Religion and Mother-Right&#8221; of 1861. Bachofen might be particularly valuable as a choice since he influenced Engels&#8217; conception of the family, but Michelet was arguably more influential on more modern figures like Gimbutas and Gloria Steinem.</p>
<p>Merely looking at ordinary human ecology books made me severely suspicious of matriarchal prehistory without reading serious critiques - in a manner absent with ideas Wiker does discuss. Also, Wiccan and other neopagan religions are most popular in the very nation - the US - that remains least secularised. If he knows this, Wiker might believe or recognise goddess-based religions as an inessential component of the decline of Christianity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115897#comment-1383947</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115897#comment-1383947</guid>
		<description>Let's get the facts right - Descarte may well have been misguided but he wasn't an atheist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s get the facts right - Descarte may well have been misguided but he wasn&#8217;t an atheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tor Hershman</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115897#comment-354572</link>
		<dc:creator>Tor Hershman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115897#comment-354572</guid>
		<description>How about the book/play by Ovid and his ridiculous, supermanesque characters?
Here’s a YouTube film about his book/play.  


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzY2bVsZK5s


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sckuqPulRGk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the book/play by Ovid and his ridiculous, supermanesque characters?<br />
Here’s a YouTube film about his book/play.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzY2bVsZK5s" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzY2bVsZK5s</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sckuqPulRGk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sckuqPulRGk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

