<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality, Canada&#8217;s CRTC To Weigh In?</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: paul kambulow</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-288137</link>
		<dc:creator>paul kambulow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-288137</guid>
		<description>Bell targets 'bandwidth hogs' Roberto Rocha, rrocha@thegazette.canwest.com 
http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=61d653fb-18b7-4c50-82b5-f720d0192444&#38;k=92480

TheGazette do note that term Hog  is a lie for these hogs had paid for the 
Bell advertised unlisted download services and broke no laws in the process.

Money hungry, clearly greedy Bell Sympatico was willing for years now to  even post false advertising promises Canada wide to all of the potential  customers equally promising a high, reliable, stable high speed Internet  system Canada wide even knowing before that they could and would not be able  to do so.

From: paul kambulow 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:15 PM
To: rrocha@thegazette.canwest.com 
Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca 
Subject: "This whole issue of throttling was brought to light when some customers who have the tools to measure their bandwidth noticed changes in their speeds". 

It was in July 2007 when for the first time I measured the speed of my internet services on a Bell recommend site   http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest  and when I found out the answer I next contacted Bell and all of the major newspapers editors, major MPs now too and rightfully complained Bell had deceived me, mislead me about the Speeds it was giving me.. Bell had broken my contractual obligations  
 
Paul
http://thenonconformer.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bell targets &#8216;bandwidth hogs&#8217; Roberto Rocha, <a href="mailto:rrocha@thegazette.canwest.com">rrocha@thegazette.canwest.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=61d653fb-18b7-4c50-82b5-f720d0192444&amp;k=92480" rel="nofollow">http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=61d653fb-18b7-4c50-82b5-f720d0192444&amp;k=92480</a></p>
<p>TheGazette do note that term Hog  is a lie for these hogs had paid for the<br />
Bell advertised unlisted download services and broke no laws in the process.</p>
<p>Money hungry, clearly greedy Bell Sympatico was willing for years now to  even post false advertising promises Canada wide to all of the potential  customers equally promising a high, reliable, stable high speed Internet  system Canada wide even knowing before that they could and would not be able  to do so.</p>
<p>From: paul kambulow<br />
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:15 PM<br />
To: <a href="mailto:rrocha@thegazette.canwest.com">rrocha@thegazette.canwest.com</a><br />
Cc: <a href="mailto:pm@pm.gc.ca">pm@pm.gc.ca</a><br />
Subject: &#8220;This whole issue of throttling was brought to light when some customers who have the tools to measure their bandwidth noticed changes in their speeds&#8221;. </p>
<p>It was in July 2007 when for the first time I measured the speed of my internet services on a Bell recommend site   <a href="http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest" rel="nofollow">http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest</a>  and when I found out the answer I next contacted Bell and all of the major newspapers editors, major MPs now too and rightfully complained Bell had deceived me, mislead me about the Speeds it was giving me.. Bell had broken my contractual obligations  </p>
<p>Paul<br />
<a href="http://thenonconformer.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thenonconformer.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul kambulow</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-288096</link>
		<dc:creator>paul kambulow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-288096</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Bell being a dictator, It is just really simply unbelievable as to how Bell Sympatico accounting,  Billing services are totally uncooperative, in responding to my rightful  request for an immediate, simple print out, detailed account statement the 
last 6 months of the 6 meg High Speed interest services that they are, have  been providing for me. They Bell wrongfully merely seem to think I should  pay them any amount of money they requested based on their word. I have 
never experienced such unacceptable poor service or demands on their part  any where in my whole life. Now I have had similar difficulties in having  the same Bell Sympatico deliver me a reliable, decent, promised high speed  services the last 15 months, even in regards to my email services from them  included. But if you do a Google search on Bell Sympatico you will find 
other Bell customers have had similar bad services, presently and even years  ago.

Imagine that Bell Sympatico, Bell's Sympatico Billing many times would not  answer my simple question and tell me still as how much I had paid per month, had  paid for my high speed 6 meg unlimited download Internet account in Nov  2007, and next also in February 2008, and how was the February account now  paid for and that caught me more curious, more determined to look into the whole  matter and to find out why? and what I found out was clearly  crimminal..  http://thenonconformer.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Bell being a dictator, It is just really simply unbelievable as to how Bell Sympatico accounting,  Billing services are totally uncooperative, in responding to my rightful  request for an immediate, simple print out, detailed account statement the<br />
last 6 months of the 6 meg High Speed interest services that they are, have  been providing for me. They Bell wrongfully merely seem to think I should  pay them any amount of money they requested based on their word. I have<br />
never experienced such unacceptable poor service or demands on their part  any where in my whole life. Now I have had similar difficulties in having  the same Bell Sympatico deliver me a reliable, decent, promised high speed  services the last 15 months, even in regards to my email services from them  included. But if you do a Google search on Bell Sympatico you will find<br />
other Bell customers have had similar bad services, presently and even years  ago.</p>
<p>Imagine that Bell Sympatico, Bell&#8217;s Sympatico Billing many times would not  answer my simple question and tell me still as how much I had paid per month, had  paid for my high speed 6 meg unlimited download Internet account in Nov  2007, and next also in February 2008, and how was the February account now  paid for and that caught me more curious, more determined to look into the whole  matter and to find out why? and what I found out was clearly  crimminal..  <a href="http://thenonconformer.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thenonconformer.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victor louis</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-287767</link>
		<dc:creator>victor louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-287767</guid>
		<description>Free Anti spam webinar, Why Today’s Spam Filters Fail

Spam isn’t just a big nuisance; it’s big business as well. So why is spam persisting?  
Ferris Research estimates that spam will cost $140 billion worldwide in 2008, of which $42 billion will be in the United States alone. If you compare these numbers with Ferris’s 2007 estimates of $100 billion and $35 billion, you’ll see that the cost of spam has increased substantially over 12 months.

Register for a complimentary Webinar conducted by Abaca and Ferris research to know more about how you can stop this nuisance. To register please click the link below:     
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=LPFKkdkFwOYltiQZtM_2bttw_3d_3d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free Anti spam webinar, Why Today’s Spam Filters Fail</p>
<p>Spam isn’t just a big nuisance; it’s big business as well. So why is spam persisting?<br />
Ferris Research estimates that spam will cost $140 billion worldwide in 2008, of which $42 billion will be in the United States alone. If you compare these numbers with Ferris’s 2007 estimates of $100 billion and $35 billion, you’ll see that the cost of spam has increased substantially over 12 months.</p>
<p>Register for a complimentary Webinar conducted by Abaca and Ferris research to know more about how you can stop this nuisance. To register please click the link below:<br />
<a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=LPFKkdkFwOYltiQZtM_2bttw_3d_3d" rel="nofollow">http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=LPFKkdkFwOYltiQZtM_2bttw_3d_3d</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morganlefay</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-287680</link>
		<dc:creator>Morganlefay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-287680</guid>
		<description>Bell and Rogers both supply TV and phone services....

They dont want you using your internet connection for these services.

So instead of investing in the future of the internet.... they are "shaping" the traffic or limiting it.

Canada is far behind in thier internet technology compared with Europe...where they have speeds of 20MB....compared to my current service with sympatico hoovering about 2MB...on a good day. This is not due to P2P applications as it is to poor infrastructure...IMHO.

MLF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bell and Rogers both supply TV and phone services&#8230;.</p>
<p>They dont want you using your internet connection for these services.</p>
<p>So instead of investing in the future of the internet&#8230;. they are &#8220;shaping&#8221; the traffic or limiting it.</p>
<p>Canada is far behind in thier internet technology compared with Europe&#8230;where they have speeds of 20MB&#8230;.compared to my current service with sympatico hoovering about 2MB&#8230;on a good day. This is not due to P2P applications as it is to poor infrastructure&#8230;IMHO.</p>
<p>MLF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackHole</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-287484</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackHole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-287484</guid>
		<description>I think we need to be sure it's "Traffic Shaping" and not the upsurge of P2P traffic that is at fault. Unfortunately, the use of P2P methods of propagation is tantamount to downloading the load, so to speak, from servers on the upper tier of the Net to the bottom end of the Net, which was never designed for this sort of serving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need to be sure it&#8217;s &#8220;Traffic Shaping&#8221; and not the upsurge of P2P traffic that is at fault. Unfortunately, the use of P2P methods of propagation is tantamount to downloading the load, so to speak, from servers on the upper tier of the Net to the bottom end of the Net, which was never designed for this sort of serving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-286969</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-286969</guid>
		<description>Can't help thinking...

If there are to be these MAFIAA-backed media download sites, what will be the "accepted" file transfer method for these large files?

And, how will using that form of large file transfer NOT create more of the "bandwidth hogging" that P2P/BitTorrent is supposed to??

Talk about Bell-Hypocritico!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t help thinking&#8230;</p>
<p>If there are to be these MAFIAA-backed media download sites, what will be the &#8220;accepted&#8221; file transfer method for these large files?</p>
<p>And, how will using that form of large file transfer NOT create more of the &#8220;bandwidth hogging&#8221; that P2P/BitTorrent is supposed to??</p>
<p>Talk about Bell-Hypocritico!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-286965</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/115043#comment-286965</guid>
		<description>I used to think that regulation was a bad thing. Bell has singlehandedly corrected that thinking, at least where a monopoly is involved!

Bell has been such an evil dictator to everyone for so long now. But, somehow, I knew there would come a day when Bell would have to answer for all of it.

Between the neutrality issue, the anti-throttling petition, and the anti-competition suits, Bell (and Rogers) has clearly demonstrated there is a blatant need for communications giants to be held accountable.

Now that the throttling debate has now been thrust into the CRTC's lap, it will bring in the net neutrality question right along with it.

Let's just hope the throttling petition doesn't take months/years to be heard, or the very people that filed it may end up bankrupt first.

Hats off to the CAIP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think that regulation was a bad thing. Bell has singlehandedly corrected that thinking, at least where a monopoly is involved!</p>
<p>Bell has been such an evil dictator to everyone for so long now. But, somehow, I knew there would come a day when Bell would have to answer for all of it.</p>
<p>Between the neutrality issue, the anti-throttling petition, and the anti-competition suits, Bell (and Rogers) has clearly demonstrated there is a blatant need for communications giants to be held accountable.</p>
<p>Now that the throttling debate has now been thrust into the CRTC&#8217;s lap, it will bring in the net neutrality question right along with it.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just hope the throttling petition doesn&#8217;t take months/years to be heard, or the very people that filed it may end up bankrupt first.</p>
<p>Hats off to the CAIP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
