Download it and used it as allowed by the “Fair Use” Section 107 of the Copyright Laws.

“One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” Although fair use was not mentioned in the previous copyright law, the doctrine has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years. This doctrine has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered “fair,” such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.”

http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html

Regarding this Texas Republican Party passing a resolution declaring Scientology to be a business may I ask for a link to some news because all I heard was that according to GlossLips some anon submitted a resolution to the Texas RNC. Did it actually go farther than that. I’m not saying someone is a disinformationist but something like that might actually make the news.

In response to Jessicarae it is very obvious that some actually study Scientology with only intent to attack it, rather than to try to understand it and think for themselves. Then there are others who don’t look at it all and only let others think for them. For those who who are actually interested and want to think for themselves they can find books in the library and they can decide for themselves if they want to also look at what the naysayers say. Before I joined, I looked at all this stuff and asked hard questions and decided on my own. If I had a choice do it over I would choose not to waste my time checking out the naysayers but don’t let me make that choice for you.

So I’m to understand that Manson was in prison and did some coauditing with some guy and it obviously didn’t work because when he showed up at the Celibrity Center they pretty much figured out that he was psychotic.

Just to clarify, not to criticize the word “eclectically” was not used very well by Charlie Angel as that usage would suggest the best of many combined. A better example would be the phrase Legion Of Anonymous That Hate “Eclectically”, where I use “” to indicate the word “Eclectically” was used sarcastically in forming the word LOATHE as a lable for the group calling themselves Anonymous.

Oh, THANK GOODNESS Scientology has been so clever as to trick me into absorbing the “tech” by opposing it… and the well-documented abuses of the organization.

That’s BRILLIANT.

Breathlessly awaiting my inevitable conversion to Scientology.

*chuckle*

Brainwashed cult is brainwashed.

Scientologists say that their “religion” is the “fastest-growing” in the world, with some millions of adherents. Not exactly. Objective estimates reckon about 50,000 at most. Scientology’s “stats” have been declining since the ’80s.

Quite unexpectedly, the Texas Republican Party (Ron Paul wing) has just passed a resolution declaring Scientology to be a business, not a church. It is now part of the Texas Republican Party platform. What’s next? No more tax exemption. One domino has fallen — Scientology’s bigwig rich boys had better think of non-extraditable countries in which to hide. For more info: http://www.youfoundthecard.com

That you THINK you oppose it and hate it right now is irrelevant, you’ll grow out of that someday. All that matters right now is that LRH, even from beyond the grave, succeeded in getting HIS basic ideas and concepts into all of YOUR heads.

Thanks for playing!

You can lie about our religion all you want. We’re just going to keep expanding and helping people.

And yes, Manson was. http://www.lermanet.com/scientologyscandals/charlesmanson.htm

In one case the scilons sued a publication because they printed one line about him having an e-meter at his hideout after his arrest.

What’s more interesting, however, is that Scientology’s retention rate is very, very low. It’s not unusual for many high-level staffers to “blow” (leave) the cult. In fact, just recently, Mary DeMoss is rumored to have escaped its clutches.

To find out more about Scientology’s abuses, go to
http://truthtopplestyranny.blogspot.com

“When manson was released in 1967, he went to the Scientology Center in San Francisco. Family member “Little Paul” Watkins, who accompanied him there told me, “Charlie said to them, “I’m Clear”-what do I do now?”

“In Los Angeles, he went to the Scientology Celebrity Center. Now this was more like it. Here he could mingle with the elite. i managed to obtain a copy of the original log entry: “7/31/68, new name, Charlie Manson, Devt., No Address In for Processing = Ethics = Type III.” The receptionist-who by Type III, meant “psychotic”-sent him to the Ethics Office, but he never showed up.”

“At the Spahn Ranch, Manson eclectically combined his version of Scientology auditing with post-hypnotic techniques he had learned in prison, with geographical isolation and subliminal motivation…..”

http://www.lermanet2.com/scientologyscandals/charlesmanson.htm