<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy Easter: Watch Out For Lead</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114690</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114690#comment-266388</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114690#comment-266388</guid>
		<description>I'm not familiar with the University of Rochester study but consumers should know that the LeadCheck swabs are incapable of returning a false positive -- unlike other such products on the market -- because the chemicals in the swabs react only to lead. Thus, if the swab turns red, there has to be lead present in the tested material. A false negative can only be returned if the product is used incorrectly, the surface was not cleaned or if the user did not follow the instructions. We find the tests to be 99.9 percent accurate when used correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with the University of Rochester study but consumers should know that the LeadCheck swabs are incapable of returning a false positive &#8212; unlike other such products on the market &#8212; because the chemicals in the swabs react only to lead. Thus, if the swab turns red, there has to be lead present in the tested material. A false negative can only be returned if the product is used incorrectly, the surface was not cleaned or if the user did not follow the instructions. We find the tests to be 99.9 percent accurate when used correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Reyes</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114690#comment-266298</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Reyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114690#comment-266298</guid>
		<description>The Chinese probably supplied the eggs...and people are just starting to notice.

A couple days ago I wrote about the tainted heparin that was probably due to deliberate substitution of a cheaper chemical...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese probably supplied the eggs&#8230;and people are just starting to notice.</p>
<p>A couple days ago I wrote about the tainted heparin that was probably due to deliberate substitution of a cheaper chemical&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
