Comments on: Alleged “Sexual Harassment Ring” Haunts SFU MBA Program http://www.bloggernews.net/114617 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:57:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: SFU MBA Rocks http://www.bloggernews.net/114617#comment-1806567 SFU MBA Rocks Tue, 28 Dec 2010 02:49:20 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/114617#comment-1806567 While searching for SFU, I came to this page by accident. I couldn't believe what I was reading. The first obvious impression that I got from this article is it's lack of foundation, and logic. "President of SFU, apparently aren’t telling prospective students that they were informed in writing in 2007 that companies in Canada would be asked not to hire graduates of the Segal Graduate School of Business." is put forward by the author. Yet, it doesn't mention who asks these companies, and how credible is the sources. It is very obvious that anybody can write a letter. It is the author's of the letter credibility, and foundation of the claims that set apart the letter. The author later on admits that "The letter was signed by a member of Boycott SFU". Who this member is, why it is important, and the credibility of the group is left out. Overall, this writing is highly primitive. It lacks any factual information, and it's highly motivated by other factors than truth. shame on who ever wrote this, to create and spread rumors. While searching for SFU, I came to this page by accident. I couldn’t believe what I was reading. The first obvious impression that I got from this article is it’s lack of foundation, and logic.
“President of SFU, apparently aren’t telling prospective students that they were informed in writing in 2007 that companies in Canada would be asked not to hire graduates of the Segal Graduate School of Business.” is put forward by the author. Yet, it doesn’t mention who asks these companies, and how credible is the sources. It is very obvious that anybody can write a letter. It is the author’s of the letter credibility, and foundation of the claims that set apart the letter.

The author later on admits that “The letter was signed by a member of Boycott SFU”. Who this member is, why it is important, and the credibility of the group is left out.

Overall, this writing is highly primitive. It lacks any factual information, and it’s highly motivated by other factors than truth.

shame on who ever wrote this, to create and spread rumors.

]]>