<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama: Tax and Spend Democrat Revealed</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114408</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114408#comment-524710</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114408#comment-524710</guid>
		<description>I suppose Alan Greenspan is one of these far left types who says the social security problem isn't that bad; he told Tim Russert as much on his last Meet The Press appearance.  As for Obama's specifics, the Tax Policy Center has a good paper out comparing Obama's and McCain's tax plans:

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/411693_CandidateTaxPlans.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose Alan Greenspan is one of these far left types who says the social security problem isn&#8217;t that bad; he told Tim Russert as much on his last Meet The Press appearance.  As for Obama&#8217;s specifics, the Tax Policy Center has a good paper out comparing Obama&#8217;s and McCain&#8217;s tax plans:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/411693_CandidateTaxPlans.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/411693_CandidateTaxPlans.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114408#comment-256337</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114408#comment-256337</guid>
		<description>Social security for those 65 and over, it is partially privatized it's called medicare supplemental insurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social security for those 65 and over, it is partially privatized it&#8217;s called medicare supplemental insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.D. Kain</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114408#comment-256274</link>
		<dc:creator>E.D. Kain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114408#comment-256274</guid>
		<description>It's high time we looked into the possibility of privatizing, or at least partially privatizing Social Security.

Add to that incentives for businesses and investors in our economy (i.e. LOWER taxes--don't raise them!) and we might find ourselves back on track.

Tax hikes will only burden the economy, and put our money in the pockets of the bureaucrats and special interests groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s high time we looked into the possibility of privatizing, or at least partially privatizing Social Security.</p>
<p>Add to that incentives for businesses and investors in our economy (i.e. LOWER taxes&#8211;don&#8217;t raise them!) and we might find ourselves back on track.</p>
<p>Tax hikes will only burden the economy, and put our money in the pockets of the bureaucrats and special interests groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

