<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Larry Sinclair-Obama: Obama Supporters Circulating Fake WashPo Story?</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: robert freedman</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-378197</link>
		<dc:creator>robert freedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-378197</guid>
		<description>BOB FROM BOSTON SAYS

 GO LARRY !!  KEEP IT  UP !

  WE KNOW YOU ARE TELLING THE TRUTH !!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOB FROM BOSTON SAYS</p>
<p> GO LARRY !!  KEEP IT  UP !</p>
<p>  WE KNOW YOU ARE TELLING THE TRUTH !!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mee</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-296695</link>
		<dc:creator>mee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-296695</guid>
		<description>even if it is a "fake" any allegations are still reported by the media except this one???? why did it go public and msm in puerti rico almost a week ago and sinclair first came on radio back in january and still majority of people are not aware of it if BIGFOOT sightings can be broadcast so should this mmmmmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even if it is a &#8220;fake&#8221; any allegations are still reported by the media except this one???? why did it go public and msm in puerti rico almost a week ago and sinclair first came on radio back in january and still majority of people are not aware of it if BIGFOOT sightings can be broadcast so should this mmmmmmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joepasc</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-256657</link>
		<dc:creator>joepasc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-256657</guid>
		<description>After listening to both sides, I believe Larry is telling the truth. It does not make sense for someone to take on libel and/or slander liability for something so made up. It is pretty obvious by the lack of coverage by the mainstream media they are trying to hush it up. Unlike the Mc Cain incident that was only the intimation of impropriety with a faceless accuser, you have someone that clearly gives their reasons.

This will come out in the press if Obama wins the nomination. Guaranteed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After listening to both sides, I believe Larry is telling the truth. It does not make sense for someone to take on libel and/or slander liability for something so made up. It is pretty obvious by the lack of coverage by the mainstream media they are trying to hush it up. Unlike the Mc Cain incident that was only the intimation of impropriety with a faceless accuser, you have someone that clearly gives their reasons.</p>
<p>This will come out in the press if Obama wins the nomination. Guaranteed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hydro</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-242677</link>
		<dc:creator>hydro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-242677</guid>
		<description>Polygraph doesnt meant a thing, it just means someone paid to get someone else to say Larry failed the polygraph... I'm not saying I'm being fooled by this guy, nor am I saying I believe him. I'm just saying that he is an american with a concern. And, browsing all these internet blogs, you will see a LOT of the same people/name's posting on ALL the blogs defending Obama, and calling Larry a liar/kook/nutjob/toothless crackhead/trailor park trash/mentalcase/schitzo...etc 
I havent seen any proof that Larry is any of those things, maybe he is missing a few teeth because of his crackhead years... The fact is, he was different in 1999 when he says all this takes place. Instead of calling him names trying to kill his credibility, the Obama bloggers should show some hard evidence that Obama wasnt in the area at the time. They should find this Limo driver and interview him. They should look into hotel records that Larry stayed at. But dont lie about it and boast about fake Wash. Post articles, the truth will come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polygraph doesnt meant a thing, it just means someone paid to get someone else to say Larry failed the polygraph&#8230; I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;m being fooled by this guy, nor am I saying I believe him. I&#8217;m just saying that he is an american with a concern. And, browsing all these internet blogs, you will see a LOT of the same people/name&#8217;s posting on ALL the blogs defending Obama, and calling Larry a liar/kook/nutjob/toothless crackhead/trailor park trash/mentalcase/schitzo&#8230;etc<br />
I havent seen any proof that Larry is any of those things, maybe he is missing a few teeth because of his crackhead years&#8230; The fact is, he was different in 1999 when he says all this takes place. Instead of calling him names trying to kill his credibility, the Obama bloggers should show some hard evidence that Obama wasnt in the area at the time. They should find this Limo driver and interview him. They should look into hotel records that Larry stayed at. But dont lie about it and boast about fake Wash. Post articles, the truth will come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cleary</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240918</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cleary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240918</guid>
		<description>Either way, he failed the polygraph, that's too bad!

Well, I am just sorry I got fooled by this con artist!

What was he after, money...fame??

Thanks a lot LARRY!! YOU LIAR!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way, he failed the polygraph, that&#8217;s too bad!</p>
<p>Well, I am just sorry I got fooled by this con artist!</p>
<p>What was he after, money&#8230;fame??</p>
<p>Thanks a lot LARRY!! YOU LIAR!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mondoreb</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240626</link>
		<dc:creator>mondoreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240626</guid>
		<description>Hopeful:

Thank you for taking the time to comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopeful:</p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hopefull</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240595</link>
		<dc:creator>Hopefull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240595</guid>
		<description>Idiotic Conspiracy theorist. You're yammering on about one email being circulated on the internet. Wow, an email with false information is being circulated all over the nation...thats a first....dumbasss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiotic Conspiracy theorist. You&#8217;re yammering on about one email being circulated on the internet. Wow, an email with false information is being circulated all over the nation&#8230;thats a first&#8230;.dumbasss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mondoreb</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240585</link>
		<dc:creator>mondoreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240585</guid>
		<description>Buildit:

This particular story is about a fake Washington Post editorial that is being  circulated by--who? It would be fair to say an Obama supporter.

I think that  a story: someone stands up and makes an allegation (labeled clearly "allegations") and  the progress of it should should be reported.

To not report it--or to only report on a particular political party's candidates--would put us in with the mainstream media. They may be what you read, but increasingly that a minority of people.

We are in the process of posting the whitehouse polygraph tests. That will be done shortly. This is not the end of the Larry Sinclair story--that will come if conclusive proof is presented on either side--but it is the end of it's prominence, absent any other developments--for most.

That's another story.

That all being said, thank you for taking the time to stop by and comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buildit:</p>
<p>This particular story is about a fake Washington Post editorial that is being  circulated by&#8211;who? It would be fair to say an Obama supporter.</p>
<p>I think that  a story: someone stands up and makes an allegation (labeled clearly &#8220;allegations&#8221;) and  the progress of it should should be reported.</p>
<p>To not report it&#8211;or to only report on a particular political party&#8217;s candidates&#8211;would put us in with the mainstream media. They may be what you read, but increasingly that a minority of people.</p>
<p>We are in the process of posting the whitehouse polygraph tests. That will be done shortly. This is not the end of the Larry Sinclair story&#8211;that will come if conclusive proof is presented on either side&#8211;but it is the end of it&#8217;s prominence, absent any other developments&#8211;for most.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s another story.</p>
<p>That all being said, thank you for taking the time to stop by and comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buildit</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240556</link>
		<dc:creator>Buildit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/114051#comment-240556</guid>
		<description>Who cares--the TRUTH is that Larry Sinclair is a LIAR and failed BOTH of his lie detector tests and should be sued for slander. Visit www.whitehouse.com for the results! Stop putting his name in the same sentence with Sen. Obama. You look like a fool continuing on with this pathetic non-story when you should be posting an apology for posting this nonsense in the first place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares&#8211;the TRUTH is that Larry Sinclair is a LIAR and failed BOTH of his lie detector tests and should be sued for slander. Visit <a href="http://www.whitehouse.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.com</a> for the results! Stop putting his name in the same sentence with Sen. Obama. You look like a fool continuing on with this pathetic non-story when you should be posting an apology for posting this nonsense in the first place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

