<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious Research or Manipulation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggernews.net/114021/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114021</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Reyes</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/114021#comment-238915</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Reyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 05:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernews.net/114021#comment-238915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Templeton group is a bit more sophisticated than all that.

As for &quot;religion&quot;, the real puzzle for progressives is that it has persisted for hundreds of thousands of years, and know one knows why.

But &quot;religion&quot; is a vague name for any number of things: World view, philosophy, superstition, ethical system. 

Some &quot;religions&quot; have ethics, but no god (Confuscian ethics). OThers have 
Others have gods but not ethics (mainly superficial believers in any of a number of &quot;religions&quot; that try to manipulate a deity/spirit, both traditional and major religions).

Then you have pious atheists who rebel against religion because of it&#039;s ethical system (mainly Western types who want to be free of traditino).

Finally, you have the &quot;modern&quot; atheistic utopian believers, from Communists to jihadis to progressives in the US...seeking to make utopia, and finding the quiet &quot;religious&quot; believers are the problem with the world.

Take your pick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Templeton group is a bit more sophisticated than all that.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;religion&#8221;, the real puzzle for progressives is that it has persisted for hundreds of thousands of years, and know one knows why.</p>
<p>But &#8220;religion&#8221; is a vague name for any number of things: World view, philosophy, superstition, ethical system. </p>
<p>Some &#8220;religions&#8221; have ethics, but no god (Confuscian ethics). OThers have<br />
Others have gods but not ethics (mainly superficial believers in any of a number of &#8220;religions&#8221; that try to manipulate a deity/spirit, both traditional and major religions).</p>
<p>Then you have pious atheists who rebel against religion because of it&#8217;s ethical system (mainly Western types who want to be free of traditino).</p>
<p>Finally, you have the &#8220;modern&#8221; atheistic utopian believers, from Communists to jihadis to progressives in the US&#8230;seeking to make utopia, and finding the quiet &#8220;religious&#8221; believers are the problem with the world.</p>
<p>Take your pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
