Larry Sinclair has Accused Barack Obama of sharing Drugs and Sex with him in 1999
The Mainstream Media has imposed what some have called a “press blackout”
Bill O’Reilley alluded to the story on “The O’Reilley Factor” last night
Is the Obama-Sinclair Story Finally Ready for MSM Prime Time?
We’re not the only ones with a sharp eye. Yesterday a video was posted on Youtube by someone who believes they heard Bill O’Reilly and Tony Snow on The O’Reilly Factor allude to the still unsubstantiated scandal of illegal drugs and gay sex surrounding Senator Barack Obama.
[video]
O’Reilly and Snow were discussing the story put out by the New York Times which alluded to an affair between the top Republican candidate for President, Senator John McCain, and one cute blond lobbyist, Vicki Iseman.
Excerpts from the show’s transcripts:
SNOW: But it seems that Bill Keller, the executive editor, thought this was a sloppy piece of work and kept resisting it. There was a lot of pressure out of the Washington bureau. “Hey, we’ve got something saucy, boss.” And whether Bill Keller, for whatever reason, knuckled under and figured that this is the way to sort of get along, I don’t know.
But having been in journalism for nearly 30 years, I’ve got to tell you, no editor is going to look at something like that and say that it measures up, because it doesn’t. It doesn’t even measure up in terms of gossip.
Read rest of story:
Bill O’Reilly: Tap-dancing Around the Alleged Obama Scandal
Source:
Bill O’Reilly: Tap-dancing Around the Alleged Obama Scandal
Mondoreb blogs at Death By 1000 Papercuts. Interested readers can e-mail him at
mondoreb@gmail.com. All DBKP stories are filed under Mondoreb at BNN. This story is by LBG.
Loading ...
14 users commented in " Larry Sinclair-Obama: Bill O’Reilly Tap-Dances Around Alleged Obama Scandal "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackObama Cult Freaks are going to be jumping out windows and hanging themselves when they wake up from this dream
News flash: this is not a secret rumor to anyone who has read the web. Supporters just recognize a lie when they see one.
Let’s see what the polygraph test says, Sinclair is taking it on Feb 26th. As for Ruth saying “Supporters just recognize a lie when they see one”, that’s pretty scary, sounds like Ruth has been brainwashed to believe Obama walks on water. As an Independent, I have finally been turned off Obama because of the fanaticism of his supporters. 100 years in Iraq is better than a demi-god President with throngs of worshippers.
Fox is accusing the New York Times of a lack of integrity? This is like PAt Buchanan accusing Ted Kennedy of being a Fascist.
In answer to all the whining that the NY Times, as well as the MSM aren’t carrying the Sinclair story, neither are Limbaugh, FOX ( so far ), nor the NY Post, all of which hate Obama. The story isn’t being carried because, as a blogger named Mau put it: All this guy ( Sinclair ) proves is that he’s a drug addicted cock sucker in search of an easy buck’
Add to this that Sinclair is a Ron Paul operative:
http://dearmurray.com/why-are-ron-paul-supporters-working-so-hard-to-defame-obama/
To Ruth: A healthy sense of skeptism doesn’t require someone be an Obama supporter. Anyone who believes the YouTube accusation without question is either a total idiot or an Obama hater whose hatred has taken over their brain.
To Wendy: I agree, just like all the people who believe the NY Times accusation of McCain having an affair with a lobbyist without question is either a total idiot or a McCain hater whose hatred has taken over their brain.
At least it can be substantiated that McCain and that lobbyist have ever met each other. And let’s be honest, McCain has a prior history of adultery so it wouldn’t be out of character for him. I don’t hate John McCain. I don’t care if he had an affair. But it’s nowhere near as absurd as this utterly ridiculous and completely unsubstantiated sexual fantasy being shared by an ex-convict, drug addict nutjob on youtube. let him offer a shred of proof.
Polygraphs are garbage, by the way. They don’t prove anything…not that I expect the whitehouse.com test to be anywhere near on the level. Larry Sinclair is not a secret to Obama supporters. Everybody already knows about it and recognizes it for the asinine fantasy that it is.
Bottom line, the only people who are buying this nonsense are morons and partisan, right wing knuckle draggers who would never vote for Obama anyway.
By the way. No one on the left really cares about the McCain thing either. Even the rest of the MSM is dismissing it. Liberals don’t care about candidates’ personal sex lives.
One last thing. Ecen if Obama did hypothetically get a BJ from some hobo in the back of a limo? So what? That’s not against the law. It didn’t happen but it would be meaningless if it did.
Bill O’Reilly had better be careful. He had his own TRUE sex scandal a while ago.
Well, JJ, I don’t believe any of these type of stories without a little more information/proof, regardless of the party. I’m not exactly an Obama supporter but the possibility of people automatically believing a YouTube video posted by some random person is absolutely hilarious as far as I’m concerned … much more so than giving consideration to a MSM report. I don’t place nearly as much importance on the private sex lives of our candidates as I do their positions of issues, though as Ken points out it wouldn’t be totally out of character for McCain. In the end, neither “reports” would sway my vote.
Through all of this, I just can’t help thinking of the actual court papers filed against Bush by a Texas woman (Margie Shoedinger, now deceased) and how the MSM totally ignored the story of sitting President being accused of sexual assault. You would think in the very least a major news outlet would have given it a mention, possibly even attempted to disprove the claims. The silence of THAT doesn’t outrage the blogging community but ignoring a YouTube video DOES? These are bizarre times we live in.
LESSON TO ALL OBAMA SUPPORTERS: The hangover is proportional to the high. Get out the aspirin–lots of it.
Fascinating how obama-krishna-moonies keep trying to remind others that John McCain “has done it before” while repeating they don’t care about that sort of thing because they’re so liberal.
Truth is, they DO care, and they are bracing for the worst, hoping for all hope this Sinclair goes away.
If it doesn’t matter, why do you keep bringing it up?
And of course you would leave out the crack-smoking in making the ultra-liberal argument that it’s “just a blow-job from a hobo in a limo anyway.”
I can see that campaign slogan now, “It was just a blow job from a hobo in a limo…BLOWBAMA 2008
As for the desperate equalizer in McCain’s having “done it before…”
He and his wife celebrate their 30th anniversary this year. They have 2 sons serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. They have other children (I believe at least one is adopted, not sure). These things are points of actual record.
As for his first marriage, I don’t know if it ended because of infidelity as much as other issues(would they be the first and has he been throwing stones on the issue to deserve this?). I would imagine after 5 years in a vietnamese prison, perhaps people return to find their marriages and parts of their lives have suffered irreparable damage. They could be commended for putting much of their lives back together in such remarkable fashion.
For “zemo”:
McCain and Cindy met in 1979. They were married in May of 1980, one month after his divorce from first wife Carol. McCain has said the failure of his first marriage was due to his selfishness and immaturity. He has seven children — three from his first marriage, four from his second. His son Jimmy is in Iraq.
Obama and Michelle met in 1989 and were married in 1992. They have two daughters.
It’s very obvious that Liberals don’t place much importance on a candidate’s personal affairs (no pun intended) but the party that describes itself as the one of “family values” DOES. It’s being brought up because of the nature of the current story being discussed and perfectly understandable why people are mentioning the Republican candidate’s “family values”, including his divorce. Think back to the year 2004 … Republicans felt very differently when it was the Democratic presidential candidate who had been divorced. And while I see you apparently put quite a bit of faith in every accusation contained in the you tube video you’ve easily dismissed the possibility of an improper relationship with Iseman while glossing over the issue of McCain’s lobbyist ties in what seems to be your “ultra-rightwing argument”.
Sinclair has failed the polygraph.
larry passed test 2 and 3 and clean on drug test,mr obama needs to speek out now before the repubs do in the national elect.
Leave A Reply