<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Larry Sinclair-Obama: Sex, Drugs, Lawsuits, YouTube and the MSM</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gaydar alert</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-1301779</link>
		<dc:creator>gaydar alert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-1301779</guid>
		<description>Oh hell yes its true...I said that he was gay the first time I saw him.

No doubt. 

Michelle looks like Wookie in drag...next best thing to a man in lingerie...

It will come out...he will need another fix...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh hell yes its true&#8230;I said that he was gay the first time I saw him.</p>
<p>No doubt. </p>
<p>Michelle looks like Wookie in drag&#8230;next best thing to a man in lingerie&#8230;</p>
<p>It will come out&#8230;he will need another fix&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaetano</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-1024961</link>
		<dc:creator>gaetano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-1024961</guid>
		<description>well ,what would you be saying if this were true? Who would be the nutcase then? Are you willing to just let a rumor go away or let us find out if its true or false.Can`t hurt anyone but Obamma himself,and if true YOU PISSPOOR DUMB ASS DEMOCRATIC FOOLS WOULD BE LAUGHED AT UNTILL THE END OF THE WORLD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well ,what would you be saying if this were true? Who would be the nutcase then? Are you willing to just let a rumor go away or let us find out if its true or false.Can`t hurt anyone but Obamma himself,and if true YOU PISSPOOR DUMB ASS DEMOCRATIC FOOLS WOULD BE LAUGHED AT UNTILL THE END OF THE WORLD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmallWurld</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-715164</link>
		<dc:creator>SmallWurld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-715164</guid>
		<description>Well, the Sinclair smear attempt didn't work.  The Ashley Todd smear didn't work.  The dead bear cub with an Obama campaign sign backfired.  The choice of Not-Quite-Ready-for-Prime Time Palin as VP running mate isn't working.

It makes one feel almost sorry for the McCain campaign... or it would if it wasn't so very entertaining to watch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Sinclair smear attempt didn&#8217;t work.  The Ashley Todd smear didn&#8217;t work.  The dead bear cub with an Obama campaign sign backfired.  The choice of Not-Quite-Ready-for-Prime Time Palin as VP running mate isn&#8217;t working.</p>
<p>It makes one feel almost sorry for the McCain campaign&#8230; or it would if it wasn&#8217;t so very entertaining to watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaetano</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-492010</link>
		<dc:creator>gaetano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-492010</guid>
		<description>Who gives a sh____. Obamma will still lose in this election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gives a sh____. Obamma will still lose in this election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Malone Ruhr</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-315743</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Malone Ruhr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-315743</guid>
		<description>Apparently any mentally sick person can make up 
anything and it will be posted.  
This a a shameful situation; where the rantings of   a diseased mind get attenion. A fact check-up should be required. 
Why is this allowed Have we sunk so low?
 I have contempt  for AOL for  printing this trash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently any mentally sick person can make up<br />
anything and it will be posted.<br />
This a a shameful situation; where the rantings of   a diseased mind get attenion. A fact check-up should be required.<br />
Why is this allowed Have we sunk so low?<br />
 I have contempt  for AOL for  printing this trash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfman Al</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-256379</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfman Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-256379</guid>
		<description>You Americans have the chance to change things in the US and possibly the world. I've looked with interest at all the sniping nonsense against Obama and I have to say it is very petty and very sleazy! The whiff of racism dances like a frantic shadow in the underbelly of all the Obama naysayers' arguments. Everybody needs to wise up! You people need to leave 20th century Punch and Judy politics behind. Whatever you think you have on Obama that is suspicious, it does not hold up a light to the kind of slaughter that will take place on the Clintons should she be chosen as the Democratic candidate. There are just too many skeletons in her and Bill's cupboard and this will play against her. Fact, and y'all can check my prediction on this: If Clinton wins the nomination then it's a walk in the park for Mcain and four more years of the Republicans. Y'all need to get rid of that old redneck racism that has kept your country from evolving into a mature democracy. America has the chance to choose a future that takes us(the world) into a century where you can put the race issue you have been grappling with to bed once and for all. America has the chance to work with both sides of the political divide that will unite it in a way that neither Clinton or Mcain will succeed in doing. Finally America has the opportunity to show how great and progressive it can be. Clinton will divide you - Obama will unite you. Everyone of you knows this to be true whatever your political persuasion. Obama is the strongest political figure to emerge from the US since Kennedy absolutely no doubt about it! From where I'm sitting, I am thinking you people are crazy to be sabotaging possibly your one chance to leap ahead into the 21st century ...

The Wolfman has spoken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Americans have the chance to change things in the US and possibly the world. I&#8217;ve looked with interest at all the sniping nonsense against Obama and I have to say it is very petty and very sleazy! The whiff of racism dances like a frantic shadow in the underbelly of all the Obama naysayers&#8217; arguments. Everybody needs to wise up! You people need to leave 20th century Punch and Judy politics behind. Whatever you think you have on Obama that is suspicious, it does not hold up a light to the kind of slaughter that will take place on the Clintons should she be chosen as the Democratic candidate. There are just too many skeletons in her and Bill&#8217;s cupboard and this will play against her. Fact, and y&#8217;all can check my prediction on this: If Clinton wins the nomination then it&#8217;s a walk in the park for Mcain and four more years of the Republicans. Y&#8217;all need to get rid of that old redneck racism that has kept your country from evolving into a mature democracy. America has the chance to choose a future that takes us(the world) into a century where you can put the race issue you have been grappling with to bed once and for all. America has the chance to work with both sides of the political divide that will unite it in a way that neither Clinton or Mcain will succeed in doing. Finally America has the opportunity to show how great and progressive it can be. Clinton will divide you - Obama will unite you. Everyone of you knows this to be true whatever your political persuasion. Obama is the strongest political figure to emerge from the US since Kennedy absolutely no doubt about it! From where I&#8217;m sitting, I am thinking you people are crazy to be sabotaging possibly your one chance to leap ahead into the 21st century &#8230;</p>
<p>The Wolfman has spoken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CherCher</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-253828</link>
		<dc:creator>CherCher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-253828</guid>
		<description>Gunnero

You are what is called a lacky.  For you to even mention Hillary Clinton's name shows your desperation.  Hillary don't have to do this - the Republicans are willing and able.  They have sent thousands of their supporters to democratic caucuses to vote for Obama so that he could be the nominee because they have a arsenal of goodies to unleash against him.  If you think this campaign is nasty, you had better get out your gas mask which you will have to wear permanently from June to November 3.  He cannot stand up to their punches.  My girl Hillary is a tough cookie.  They could not lay a glove on her for the last 16 years.

All of Obama friends will be paid to talk about his drug usage etc., his sexuality etc. , the corruption in Chicago etc. so buckle up.  It is going to get worse.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunnero</p>
<p>You are what is called a lacky.  For you to even mention Hillary Clinton&#8217;s name shows your desperation.  Hillary don&#8217;t have to do this - the Republicans are willing and able.  They have sent thousands of their supporters to democratic caucuses to vote for Obama so that he could be the nominee because they have a arsenal of goodies to unleash against him.  If you think this campaign is nasty, you had better get out your gas mask which you will have to wear permanently from June to November 3.  He cannot stand up to their punches.  My girl Hillary is a tough cookie.  They could not lay a glove on her for the last 16 years.</p>
<p>All of Obama friends will be paid to talk about his drug usage etc., his sexuality etc. , the corruption in Chicago etc. so buckle up.  It is going to get worse.  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CherChere</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-253820</link>
		<dc:creator>CherChere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-253820</guid>
		<description>EMAN

Calm down!!!  Mr. Sinclair did not always look this way.  It seems in the 1990's he was a young, verile white male with all his teeth and doing well in his life, driving around in his limo and staying in fancy hotel.  Doing drugs can make you lose EVERYTHING.

It can also lead to mental illness.  So don't be swearing up and down since you just recently aware of Mr. Sinclair's and Sen. Obama's existence.  You know very little about both men.  This is a he said she said situation but we know that certain information can be verified to make it more believable on one side than the other.  We know Senator Obama did drugs - he admitted it in his book.  So one piece of the information is actually true.  The second part - we were not there but maybe the Hotel's record could verify if Mr. Sinclair had a room there and you could get into the process of elimination to see who is more believable.  That is how the Courts do things, a Jury, who was not present when the offence was committed, listens to the evidence and makes a judgement as to guilt of innocence.  This no different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMAN</p>
<p>Calm down!!!  Mr. Sinclair did not always look this way.  It seems in the 1990&#8217;s he was a young, verile white male with all his teeth and doing well in his life, driving around in his limo and staying in fancy hotel.  Doing drugs can make you lose EVERYTHING.</p>
<p>It can also lead to mental illness.  So don&#8217;t be swearing up and down since you just recently aware of Mr. Sinclair&#8217;s and Sen. Obama&#8217;s existence.  You know very little about both men.  This is a he said she said situation but we know that certain information can be verified to make it more believable on one side than the other.  We know Senator Obama did drugs - he admitted it in his book.  So one piece of the information is actually true.  The second part - we were not there but maybe the Hotel&#8217;s record could verify if Mr. Sinclair had a room there and you could get into the process of elimination to see who is more believable.  That is how the Courts do things, a Jury, who was not present when the offence was committed, listens to the evidence and makes a judgement as to guilt of innocence.  This no different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunnerro</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-244590</link>
		<dc:creator>gunnerro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-244590</guid>
		<description>If it can be proven that Hilliary Clinton is behind this sick, sleazy, smear, I will forever hate her. I saw the tapes of this bastard and I instantly picked up on the stereotype of him, an upstanding representative of the white race, sniffing powdered cocaine while Obama smoked rock cocaine. 

This man Sinclair is a sick person but no more so than those idiots who will believe this bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it can be proven that Hilliary Clinton is behind this sick, sleazy, smear, I will forever hate her. I saw the tapes of this bastard and I instantly picked up on the stereotype of him, an upstanding representative of the white race, sniffing powdered cocaine while Obama smoked rock cocaine. </p>
<p>This man Sinclair is a sick person but no more so than those idiots who will believe this bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWPittelli</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-242822</link>
		<dc:creator>DWPittelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-242822</guid>
		<description>Larry Says: (February 21st, 2008 at 5:32 pm)
&lt;i&gt;[Obama's] dealings with Rezco alone, which he has not denied, should have shown everyone what a crooked politician he is - getting someone to pay the land owner 1.6 million for one property, so he can get an essentially one million dollar house and land for $300,000.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, Rezko's wife bought the lot for $625,000, while Obama bought his home for $1,650,000. To be sure, Obama paid 300,000 below the asking price. He says this was because the house had been on the market for months. All in all, I'd say this must be considered an order of magnitude less serious than the Clintons' Whitewater deal, because Obama never drew up legal documents allowing Rezco to fraudulently get improper loans, as Hillary did Jim McDougal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry Says: (February 21st, 2008 at 5:32 pm)<br />
<i>[Obama&#8217;s] dealings with Rezco alone, which he has not denied, should have shown everyone what a crooked politician he is - getting someone to pay the land owner 1.6 million for one property, so he can get an essentially one million dollar house and land for $300,000.</i></p>
<p>Actually, Rezko&#8217;s wife bought the lot for $625,000, while Obama bought his home for $1,650,000. To be sure, Obama paid 300,000 below the asking price. He says this was because the house had been on the market for months. All in all, I&#8217;d say this must be considered an order of magnitude less serious than the Clintons&#8217; Whitewater deal, because Obama never drew up legal documents allowing Rezco to fraudulently get improper loans, as Hillary did Jim McDougal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LARRY FAILED POLYGRAPH</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-240781</link>
		<dc:creator>LARRY FAILED POLYGRAPH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-240781</guid>
		<description>Larry LIED

he failed his polygraph!!

BY BY LARRY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry LIED</p>
<p>he failed his polygraph!!</p>
<p>BY BY LARRY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-240614</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-240614</guid>
		<description>Well, Larry failed his lie-detector test, so I guess that settles it. It was obviously a made-up story. Now we know it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Larry failed his lie-detector test, so I guess that settles it. It was obviously a made-up story. Now we know it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-240494</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-240494</guid>
		<description>Sick, people. You all are so desperate for this story to be true that you all are willing to take the word of a crazy/untested. By the way - the results of the lie detector tests are published at www.whitehouse.com. Guess what?! SINCLAIR LIED!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sick, people. You all are so desperate for this story to be true that you all are willing to take the word of a crazy/untested. By the way - the results of the lie detector tests are published at <a href="http://www.whitehouse.com." rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.com.</a> Guess what?! SINCLAIR LIED!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAY</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-240221</link>
		<dc:creator>JAY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-240221</guid>
		<description>What I find troubling is the denial video on Youtube. In the video the gentleman states that Sinclair was "two weeks late" with his dates and then tells us Sinclair may have had sex with a black man, but it wasn't Obama. Seems if he was two weeks late how could he have been there to have sex with ANYONE? Seems the denial leaves more questions unanswered then the allegation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find troubling is the denial video on Youtube. In the video the gentleman states that Sinclair was &#8220;two weeks late&#8221; with his dates and then tells us Sinclair may have had sex with a black man, but it wasn&#8217;t Obama. Seems if he was two weeks late how could he have been there to have sex with ANYONE? Seems the denial leaves more questions unanswered then the allegation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-239701</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-239701</guid>
		<description>Mr. Sinclair may just be simply telling the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Sinclair may just be simply telling the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zemo</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-239605</link>
		<dc:creator>zemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-239605</guid>
		<description>Eman must've WATCHED the video in order to say "anyone who would" should have their head examined.
As a police officer in Chicago, I lost count of the upscale, educated, married men I have stopped in the "usual" places where these men go to meet other men for these types of encounters.
Granted, we're talking about parking lots (ironically, the biggest one was not too far from 63rd street beach in Obama's former legislative district, just coincidence, I'm sure), wooded areas, and certain neighborhoods.
I thought this story was nonsense from a druggy except, the guy didn't look that way in '99.  
There are unfortunately no shortage of stupid mistakes made by elected officials where sex and alcohol (and probably drugs) are involved, leading to vulnerable misgivings-turned-regrets.

This guy should be discredited.  If it's utter nonsense then his lack of credibility should be easy to establish.  It shouldn't have taken this long for someone who supports Obama (his campaign is rolling in millions), to investigate so as to protect their guy.

Unfortunately, Obama is a product of the Chicago Democratic Machine and his campaign manager is David Axelrod.  If only you knew...
The list of indictments, investigations, and subsequent convictions of elected officials is long and telling.  Yet Obama has traded endorsements, made deals, and stood loyally with the worst here.  In his own words " I'm from Chicago (which he isn't), you wanna do politics, I can do politics..." This at a rally where he gave one of his usual "moving" speeches about "change" from politics as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eman must&#8217;ve WATCHED the video in order to say &#8220;anyone who would&#8221; should have their head examined.<br />
As a police officer in Chicago, I lost count of the upscale, educated, married men I have stopped in the &#8220;usual&#8221; places where these men go to meet other men for these types of encounters.<br />
Granted, we&#8217;re talking about parking lots (ironically, the biggest one was not too far from 63rd street beach in Obama&#8217;s former legislative district, just coincidence, I&#8217;m sure), wooded areas, and certain neighborhoods.<br />
I thought this story was nonsense from a druggy except, the guy didn&#8217;t look that way in &#8216;99.<br />
There are unfortunately no shortage of stupid mistakes made by elected officials where sex and alcohol (and probably drugs) are involved, leading to vulnerable misgivings-turned-regrets.</p>
<p>This guy should be discredited.  If it&#8217;s utter nonsense then his lack of credibility should be easy to establish.  It shouldn&#8217;t have taken this long for someone who supports Obama (his campaign is rolling in millions), to investigate so as to protect their guy.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Obama is a product of the Chicago Democratic Machine and his campaign manager is David Axelrod.  If only you knew&#8230;<br />
The list of indictments, investigations, and subsequent convictions of elected officials is long and telling.  Yet Obama has traded endorsements, made deals, and stood loyally with the worst here.  In his own words &#8221; I&#8217;m from Chicago (which he isn&#8217;t), you wanna do politics, I can do politics&#8230;&#8221; This at a rally where he gave one of his usual &#8220;moving&#8221; speeches about &#8220;change&#8221; from politics as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eman</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-238781</link>
		<dc:creator>Eman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-238781</guid>
		<description>Wackjob....plain and simple. You mean to tell me this short, fat, toothless, ugly white guy walks into an undisclosed "upscale" bar in Chicago and tells the bartender to hook him up with some drugs and the bartender just so happens to call Obama, the closet gay drug dealing negro who is happy to leave his new born child  at home with mommy for a wild romp with a stranger in the back of a limo?  

GIVE ME A BREAK!!!! Anyone who would stop and listen to this psycho for 5 minutes needs to get his head examined.  ANYONE can post a f-cking video on U-tube....ANYONE!!!  Even a 5150 psycho like this guy.

Get real...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wackjob&#8230;.plain and simple. You mean to tell me this short, fat, toothless, ugly white guy walks into an undisclosed &#8220;upscale&#8221; bar in Chicago and tells the bartender to hook him up with some drugs and the bartender just so happens to call Obama, the closet gay drug dealing negro who is happy to leave his new born child  at home with mommy for a wild romp with a stranger in the back of a limo?  </p>
<p>GIVE ME A BREAK!!!! Anyone who would stop and listen to this psycho for 5 minutes needs to get his head examined.  ANYONE can post a f-cking video on U-tube&#8230;.ANYONE!!!  Even a 5150 psycho like this guy.</p>
<p>Get real&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-238628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-238628</guid>
		<description>I read on another blogg that Larry Sinclair was in a mental hospital during the time he says he was in Illinois when the alleged incident was  to have occurred.  Supposedly, he is suffering from sever psychosis due to schizophrenia.  He is currently residing in a government subsidized home for the mentally ill and disabled. A polygraph test is not needed, the name of the limo driver would suffice to give the story a scintilla of credibility.  Sinclair needs our prays and understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read on another blogg that Larry Sinclair was in a mental hospital during the time he says he was in Illinois when the alleged incident was  to have occurred.  Supposedly, he is suffering from sever psychosis due to schizophrenia.  He is currently residing in a government subsidized home for the mentally ill and disabled. A polygraph test is not needed, the name of the limo driver would suffice to give the story a scintilla of credibility.  Sinclair needs our prays and understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Blevins</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-238519</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Blevins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-238519</guid>
		<description>I believe if this had been any other canidate that was sued in federal court (Hillary Clinton or John McCain or John Edwards) with charges on Drugs and a Sex Scandal it would have been made public as it was about John McCain and he has denied it and also the person that he was accused about has denied it.I think this is about who is willing to pay the most money and who the media wants to be president.The Media does not give all of the canidates fair exposure.I think this should be made public so the voters can decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe if this had been any other canidate that was sued in federal court (Hillary Clinton or John McCain or John Edwards) with charges on Drugs and a Sex Scandal it would have been made public as it was about John McCain and he has denied it and also the person that he was accused about has denied it.I think this is about who is willing to pay the most money and who the media wants to be president.The Media does not give all of the canidates fair exposure.I think this should be made public so the voters can decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. No</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237936</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. No</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237936</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that here we have one person claiming to have had committed a sex on Obama and the NY Times won't touch the story.  Yet they will report on a story about McCain when both he and Iseman say they didn't have a affair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that here we have one person claiming to have had committed a sex on Obama and the NY Times won&#8217;t touch the story.  Yet they will report on a story about McCain when both he and Iseman say they didn&#8217;t have a affair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237926</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237926</guid>
		<description>As with most blogs, dominated by young people, anyone daring to say anything negative about Saint Barak Obama had better back off.  While I agree that most of these fools making such allegations are just trying to get their 15 minutes worth of fame, I have been considerably amazed at the hordes falling for the snake oil sales of Obama since the beginning.  His dealings with Rezco alone, which he has not denied, should have shown everyone what a crooked politician he is - getting someone to pay the land owner 1.6 million for one property, so he can get an essentially one million dollar house and land for $300,000, from a political player and slum lord like Rezco, should have had everyone dropping their support for the crook.  He has always seemed too slick to me, he was the least qualified person of the 18 or so candidates of both parties to run for president, yet Americans bought his charasmatic speaking hook, line and sinker.  But then they were stupid enough to buy Bush, TWICE, and he is still learning how to be president.  If Barak Obama was a woman, even a black woman, running on his qualifications, he would have been laughed into oblivion by whites and blacks alike and dropped out by New Hampshire.  Yet, here you are again (just like Bush supporters defended his skiing in Colorado while AWOL, doing drugs, getting DWI's and sucking up money to from the family who spawned Isama Bin Laden the 911 mastermind to pay for his financial mistakes) defending Obama with blind faith when there could actually be some truth yet to come on this extra-marital homosexual affair and adult drug use.  I am sick and tired of being in a country full of so many morons who buy easily into these people who continue to use America for their private bank accounts.  At least with Clinton, you know pretty much what you are getting.  Are you going to wait until Obama wins the nomination before more crap like this surfaces from the Right-Wing attack machine and we get four more years of Reagonomics and war, and our economy ends up completely in the toilet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with most blogs, dominated by young people, anyone daring to say anything negative about Saint Barak Obama had better back off.  While I agree that most of these fools making such allegations are just trying to get their 15 minutes worth of fame, I have been considerably amazed at the hordes falling for the snake oil sales of Obama since the beginning.  His dealings with Rezco alone, which he has not denied, should have shown everyone what a crooked politician he is - getting someone to pay the land owner 1.6 million for one property, so he can get an essentially one million dollar house and land for $300,000, from a political player and slum lord like Rezco, should have had everyone dropping their support for the crook.  He has always seemed too slick to me, he was the least qualified person of the 18 or so candidates of both parties to run for president, yet Americans bought his charasmatic speaking hook, line and sinker.  But then they were stupid enough to buy Bush, TWICE, and he is still learning how to be president.  If Barak Obama was a woman, even a black woman, running on his qualifications, he would have been laughed into oblivion by whites and blacks alike and dropped out by New Hampshire.  Yet, here you are again (just like Bush supporters defended his skiing in Colorado while AWOL, doing drugs, getting DWI&#8217;s and sucking up money to from the family who spawned Isama Bin Laden the 911 mastermind to pay for his financial mistakes) defending Obama with blind faith when there could actually be some truth yet to come on this extra-marital homosexual affair and adult drug use.  I am sick and tired of being in a country full of so many morons who buy easily into these people who continue to use America for their private bank accounts.  At least with Clinton, you know pretty much what you are getting.  Are you going to wait until Obama wins the nomination before more crap like this surfaces from the Right-Wing attack machine and we get four more years of Reagonomics and war, and our economy ends up completely in the toilet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237792</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237792</guid>
		<description>Comment by Dave:
&lt;i&gt;This looks 50% as legitimate as the book “Fortunate Son,” which detailed, among other things, George Bush’s gay sex and cocaine binges and also alleged that Bush’s wife killed a person by running a stop sign.&lt;/i&gt; 

Careful, Dave.  Laura Bush DID kill a classmate by running a stop sign when she was 17 years old.  http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/laura.asp

Not that we should accept accusations at face value, but we shouldn't dismiss them out of hand, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Dave:<br />
<i>This looks 50% as legitimate as the book “Fortunate Son,” which detailed, among other things, George Bush’s gay sex and cocaine binges and also alleged that Bush’s wife killed a person by running a stop sign.</i> </p>
<p>Careful, Dave.  Laura Bush DID kill a classmate by running a stop sign when she was 17 years old.  <a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/laura.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/laura.asp</a></p>
<p>Not that we should accept accusations at face value, but we shouldn&#8217;t dismiss them out of hand, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237664</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237664</guid>
		<description>Yeegads...the nut cases are out in force.

This reminds me of the e-mail I received from my own brother, making a HUGE issue of Barack Obama's middle name.

I fired an e-mail right back, asking him when he became a rascist cracker.

I would say something similar here, but it may just be better to chuckle softly, and move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeegads&#8230;the nut cases are out in force.</p>
<p>This reminds me of the e-mail I received from my own brother, making a HUGE issue of Barack Obama&#8217;s middle name.</p>
<p>I fired an e-mail right back, asking him when he became a rascist cracker.</p>
<p>I would say something similar here, but it may just be better to chuckle softly, and move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237647</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237647</guid>
		<description>Of course Fox supports Obama!

Obama is the Republican Frontrunner.  Rove will clean his clock and if Obama becomes 44th he will NOT be able to win re-election as the Bush Gov has stacked the deck at multiple layers and from multiple angles, leaving the door open for Gnewt.

The RNC's primary mission: Anything to keep our country from having Hillary as the DNC Winner.

McCain cant beat Hillary, as she has demonstrated her power by reconciling her marriage and perserving the honor of the president's office as first lady while the embrionic stem cell feasters drown in their own mire.

The RNC does not want to dicuss Monica as it will lend itself to Gnewt's dumping his dying wife back in the MSM.

Dont get fooled again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Fox supports Obama!</p>
<p>Obama is the Republican Frontrunner.  Rove will clean his clock and if Obama becomes 44th he will NOT be able to win re-election as the Bush Gov has stacked the deck at multiple layers and from multiple angles, leaving the door open for Gnewt.</p>
<p>The RNC&#8217;s primary mission: Anything to keep our country from having Hillary as the DNC Winner.</p>
<p>McCain cant beat Hillary, as she has demonstrated her power by reconciling her marriage and perserving the honor of the president&#8217;s office as first lady while the embrionic stem cell feasters drown in their own mire.</p>
<p>The RNC does not want to dicuss Monica as it will lend itself to Gnewt&#8217;s dumping his dying wife back in the MSM.</p>
<p>Dont get fooled again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237638</guid>
		<description>Wait wait wait....you're using the National Enquirer as a credible source?!

"We watched as the MSM judiciously ignored hard cold facts collected in the John Edwards-Rielle Hunter Love Child story by the National Enquirer."

Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait wait wait&#8230;.you&#8217;re using the National Enquirer as a credible source?!</p>
<p>&#8220;We watched as the MSM judiciously ignored hard cold facts collected in the John Edwards-Rielle Hunter Love Child story by the National Enquirer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237627</guid>
		<description>Root:   You are saying the same things that you are accusing other people of doing.  To say "John McCain and his mistress" and "Hitlery and her male slut" just shows how biased and ignorant you are!  You trully are a member of the Demwit party!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Root:   You are saying the same things that you are accusing other people of doing.  To say &#8220;John McCain and his mistress&#8221; and &#8220;Hitlery and her male slut&#8221; just shows how biased and ignorant you are!  You trully are a member of the Demwit party!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Tupper</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237605</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Tupper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237605</guid>
		<description>Gee, let’s ask Tucker Carlson and John Fund - hardly standard-bearers for the liberal media - since they were both falsely acccused of sexual improriety by two DIFFERENT crazy people. Look it up. 

Type in either one of their names and the word “rape” into Google and you’ll see it for yourself. 

Any loon can make a charge against someone. 

As Carlson said, it used to be that when a sex scandal broke, if the actual charge wasn’t true, at least something was - the candidate or person accused did something sexual. 

Then he was accused of rape in Louisville by some woman. He spent thousands of dollars not only proving he wasn’t there at the time of the alleged rape - but also that he had never been to Louisville in his entire life!!!!

Perhaps the standard of accuracy in a major media-story should be a little higher than a self-recorded You Tube video, a self-respresented case filed in Federal Court (which would accept my lawsuit against the moon for shining too bright - if I had the filing fee) and interviews by people who’s blogs make Oliver Stone movies look like recorded bits of actual history. 

Come on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, let’s ask Tucker Carlson and John Fund - hardly standard-bearers for the liberal media - since they were both falsely acccused of sexual improriety by two DIFFERENT crazy people. Look it up. </p>
<p>Type in either one of their names and the word “rape” into Google and you’ll see it for yourself. </p>
<p>Any loon can make a charge against someone. </p>
<p>As Carlson said, it used to be that when a sex scandal broke, if the actual charge wasn’t true, at least something was - the candidate or person accused did something sexual. </p>
<p>Then he was accused of rape in Louisville by some woman. He spent thousands of dollars not only proving he wasn’t there at the time of the alleged rape - but also that he had never been to Louisville in his entire life!!!!</p>
<p>Perhaps the standard of accuracy in a major media-story should be a little higher than a self-recorded You Tube video, a self-respresented case filed in Federal Court (which would accept my lawsuit against the moon for shining too bright - if I had the filing fee) and interviews by people who’s blogs make Oliver Stone movies look like recorded bits of actual history. </p>
<p>Come on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237566</guid>
		<description>I was wondering when Obamas deep dark secrets would be revealed.

This story is just the thing the Clinton campaign needs to sway the super delegates to her side in spite of the outcome of the primary vote counts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering when Obamas deep dark secrets would be revealed.</p>
<p>This story is just the thing the Clinton campaign needs to sway the super delegates to her side in spite of the outcome of the primary vote counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: root</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237537</link>
		<dc:creator>root</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237537</guid>
		<description>Before we get into politics, please remember that although the other side is incorrect and warped, you will never change their mind.

When dealing with republicans, the only way to win is to force them into a gun filled, religion opposed, racially mixed, poverty situation.
Otherwise, they'll keep repeating the old twisted mantle "welfare isn't needed", "no gun control", "trial lawyers hurt", "Put God in politics", etc. Obviously, we can't force that reality on those stuffed suited Reps, but we can take certain actions, such as boycotting Russell Weiner's(Micheal Savage's son) "Rockstar" energy drink as payback for Micheal's racism.

In their twisted view, of a world without mixed shades of colors will never end, until the results of the truth hits, and they die off from the legacy of the truth.

So, fellow democrats, give up trying to sway the fat cat "Reps" away from their twisted views, racism, prejudice, and bigotry.
They will never be "for the people", and it's like talking to a brick wall.

Just go to the polls and vote for truth. That doesn't sit well for McCain with his mistress and Hitlery with her male slut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we get into politics, please remember that although the other side is incorrect and warped, you will never change their mind.</p>
<p>When dealing with republicans, the only way to win is to force them into a gun filled, religion opposed, racially mixed, poverty situation.<br />
Otherwise, they&#8217;ll keep repeating the old twisted mantle &#8220;welfare isn&#8217;t needed&#8221;, &#8220;no gun control&#8221;, &#8220;trial lawyers hurt&#8221;, &#8220;Put God in politics&#8221;, etc. Obviously, we can&#8217;t force that reality on those stuffed suited Reps, but we can take certain actions, such as boycotting Russell Weiner&#8217;s(Micheal Savage&#8217;s son) &#8220;Rockstar&#8221; energy drink as payback for Micheal&#8217;s racism.</p>
<p>In their twisted view, of a world without mixed shades of colors will never end, until the results of the truth hits, and they die off from the legacy of the truth.</p>
<p>So, fellow democrats, give up trying to sway the fat cat &#8220;Reps&#8221; away from their twisted views, racism, prejudice, and bigotry.<br />
They will never be &#8220;for the people&#8221;, and it&#8217;s like talking to a brick wall.</p>
<p>Just go to the polls and vote for truth. That doesn&#8217;t sit well for McCain with his mistress and Hitlery with her male slut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yomama</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237334</link>
		<dc:creator>Yomama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237334</guid>
		<description>"hard cold facts collected in the John Edwards-Rielle Hunter Love Child story by the National Enquirer." </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;hard cold facts collected in the John Edwards-Rielle Hunter Love Child story by the National Enquirer.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237162</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237162</guid>
		<description>I thought that this video was a joke.  I thought that the allegation that the accuser snorted powder cocaine while Obama smoked crack was an obvious jab at racial stereotypes on cocaine use.

Perhaps it is a joke, after all.  The first page of pleadings posted here show that the plaintiff alleges violation of the plaintiff's first amendment rights by the defendants.  However, being non-governmental entities, plaintiffs have no obligation to respect, protect, or refrain from infringing upon the plaintiff's rights to free speech.

Sinclair must be hella meta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that this video was a joke.  I thought that the allegation that the accuser snorted powder cocaine while Obama smoked crack was an obvious jab at racial stereotypes on cocaine use.</p>
<p>Perhaps it is a joke, after all.  The first page of pleadings posted here show that the plaintiff alleges violation of the plaintiff&#8217;s first amendment rights by the defendants.  However, being non-governmental entities, plaintiffs have no obligation to respect, protect, or refrain from infringing upon the plaintiff&#8217;s rights to free speech.</p>
<p>Sinclair must be hella meta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237147</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237147</guid>
		<description>Will be interesting if the polygraph actually happens. Does not prove anything, whatsoever. Doesn't sound like there's any proof. With no proof and no expectation that any proof exists (assuming, of course, that something did in fact happen), I think the chances are nonexistent that this story will go any further. Nor should it. 

I'm more interested in finding out what "rock" this guy climbed up from. That's probably the real story here, if there is a story. This guy's 15 minutes are just about up. Oh yeah, the follow-up vids are hilarious. "If you post something mean about me on YouTube I will sue you, your family, and your employer." I'm exaggerating of course but the guy sounds like a real nut.

I'm actually kind of surprised YouTube still has the vid up. Granted, Obama is a public figure and is thus subject to more criticism, but it seems like this whole thing pushes the boundaries. When the National Enquirer ran the story about Bush drinking they did have real, multiple sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be interesting if the polygraph actually happens. Does not prove anything, whatsoever. Doesn&#8217;t sound like there&#8217;s any proof. With no proof and no expectation that any proof exists (assuming, of course, that something did in fact happen), I think the chances are nonexistent that this story will go any further. Nor should it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m more interested in finding out what &#8220;rock&#8221; this guy climbed up from. That&#8217;s probably the real story here, if there is a story. This guy&#8217;s 15 minutes are just about up. Oh yeah, the follow-up vids are hilarious. &#8220;If you post something mean about me on YouTube I will sue you, your family, and your employer.&#8221; I&#8217;m exaggerating of course but the guy sounds like a real nut.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually kind of surprised YouTube still has the vid up. Granted, Obama is a public figure and is thus subject to more criticism, but it seems like this whole thing pushes the boundaries. When the National Enquirer ran the story about Bush drinking they did have real, multiple sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237106</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237106</guid>
		<description>JEFF B:  How come Larry didn't take the polygraph over a month ago?  Why did he wait so long if he's telling the truth?

And if this were even REMOTELY a legitmate story, why isn't FOX NEWS even covering it?  Why would they support Obama?

Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JEFF B:  How come Larry didn&#8217;t take the polygraph over a month ago?  Why did he wait so long if he&#8217;s telling the truth?</p>
<p>And if this were even REMOTELY a legitmate story, why isn&#8217;t FOX NEWS even covering it?  Why would they support Obama?</p>
<p>Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffB</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237046</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237046</guid>
		<description>The immediate dismissal of this as just a nutjob smearing Obama is as stupid as those that just believe it as fact because they don't like him. There is an independent polygraph test set up for Tuesday, and if he passes that then it becomes a news story. It will be done by an independent proffesional and double checked by a second independent proffesional and it will all be video taped and shown. At that point the demand for names and receipts and cell phone records if available are in order. At that point it becomes imperative to demand a response and attention to this. If it is ignored at that point - then you tell me where the change is. Wouldn't that be the business as usual that entire campaign is preaching against? Isn't the little petty games that are being played the opposite of what is being preached. Cutting off Hillary last night was not an accident - it was Washington politics business as usual. It was bringing people together, it was pompous gloating and shoving it up her ass and is what we will see as opposed to what is promised in my relatively uninformed opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The immediate dismissal of this as just a nutjob smearing Obama is as stupid as those that just believe it as fact because they don&#8217;t like him. There is an independent polygraph test set up for Tuesday, and if he passes that then it becomes a news story. It will be done by an independent proffesional and double checked by a second independent proffesional and it will all be video taped and shown. At that point the demand for names and receipts and cell phone records if available are in order. At that point it becomes imperative to demand a response and attention to this. If it is ignored at that point - then you tell me where the change is. Wouldn&#8217;t that be the business as usual that entire campaign is preaching against? Isn&#8217;t the little petty games that are being played the opposite of what is being preached. Cutting off Hillary last night was not an accident - it was Washington politics business as usual. It was bringing people together, it was pompous gloating and shoving it up her ass and is what we will see as opposed to what is promised in my relatively uninformed opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-237029</guid>
		<description>This looks 50% as legitimate as the book "Fortunate Son," which detailed, among other things, George Bush's gay sex and cocaine binges and also alleged that Bush's wife killed a person by running a stop sign.  Glad to see the nutjobs are out on Obama.  Gee, wonder why the mainstream media (Fox News) didn't rush to cover that!  Does the guy that runs this blog wear a tin foil hat to keep the space aliens from stealing his thoughts?  If not, he should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks 50% as legitimate as the book &#8220;Fortunate Son,&#8221; which detailed, among other things, George Bush&#8217;s gay sex and cocaine binges and also alleged that Bush&#8217;s wife killed a person by running a stop sign.  Glad to see the nutjobs are out on Obama.  Gee, wonder why the mainstream media (Fox News) didn&#8217;t rush to cover that!  Does the guy that runs this blog wear a tin foil hat to keep the space aliens from stealing his thoughts?  If not, he should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-236838</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-236838</guid>
		<description>I'm amazed that one You Tube video can send some people into such a frenzy. Common sense tells us to be skeptical of this type of accusation. Actual court papers filed against Bush (by Margie Shoedinger, now deceased) received no attention from the MSM and THAT oversight never seemed to bother most bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed that one You Tube video can send some people into such a frenzy. Common sense tells us to be skeptical of this type of accusation. Actual court papers filed against Bush (by Margie Shoedinger, now deceased) received no attention from the MSM and THAT oversight never seemed to bother most bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beforeal</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-236701</link>
		<dc:creator>beforeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-236701</guid>
		<description>This guy is a nut job. Where is this third limo driving witness 
who has no name? And why can't he recall the name of the club he met Obama in?
Oh yeah, he says the nameless limo driver set him and SENATOR Obama 
up on a date. My god, people believe anything. This smells like a smear 
campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy is a nut job. Where is this third limo driving witness<br />
who has no name? And why can&#8217;t he recall the name of the club he met Obama in?<br />
Oh yeah, he says the nameless limo driver set him and SENATOR Obama<br />
up on a date. My god, people believe anything. This smells like a smear<br />
campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mondoreb</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-235615</link>
		<dc:creator>mondoreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-235615</guid>
		<description>Jay:

It's obvious a career as a MSM journalist awaits you.

Thanks for taking the time to comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious a career as a MSM journalist awaits you.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-235609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113912#comment-235609</guid>
		<description>Well, the story is horseshit - it has been "blacked out" because its nonsense. Next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the story is horseshit - it has been &#8220;blacked out&#8221; because its nonsense. Next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
