<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama: Larry Sinclair Claims Gay Sex, Drugs with Barack in &#8216;99</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-252190</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 23:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-252190</guid>
		<description>Austin Travers wrote: "Third, he has been rated as the most Ultra-Liberal person in our Government ever!! [..] These are facts folks and they are easy to be confirmed and checked out!"

OK I'll bite.. where can I easily confirm and check out this "fact"?  Where exactly is Obama "rated as the most Ultra-Liberal person in our Government ever!!"

--

"Then, perhaps truth or maybe not, but legitimate charges have been made by Larry Sinclair"

Um, what definition for "legitimate" are you using?  If Sinclair's allegations are false, it is slander, which by definition is not legitimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Austin Travers wrote: &#8220;Third, he has been rated as the most Ultra-Liberal person in our Government ever!! [..] These are facts folks and they are easy to be confirmed and checked out!&#8221;</p>
<p>OK I&#8217;ll bite.. where can I easily confirm and check out this &#8220;fact&#8221;?  Where exactly is Obama &#8220;rated as the most Ultra-Liberal person in our Government ever!!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>&#8220;Then, perhaps truth or maybe not, but legitimate charges have been made by Larry Sinclair&#8221;</p>
<p>Um, what definition for &#8220;legitimate&#8221; are you using?  If Sinclair&#8217;s allegations are false, it is slander, which by definition is not legitimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: celia</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-242898</link>
		<dc:creator>celia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-242898</guid>
		<description>the polygraph tes that he was paid to undertake show that he was being clearly deceptive on the two crtical questions, drugs and sex. The website has dismissed the claims and larry sinclair. They also state that the man would not give them details of the limo driver he promised could corraborate his story. HE LIED - it is quasi-proved.

In terms of Obama, he probably didnt acknowledge it as it would have detracted from his campaign as people's reactions would have been less than supporting in a crucial primary season. What helps his innocence is that the primary media have not touched it at all despite knowing about it - they surely would not hold back on a newsworthy (money-making) scandal, I believe it shows that they knew he was ridiculous and slanderous. and i thought you could be charged for creating intentional misleading damage to someone's public name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the polygraph tes that he was paid to undertake show that he was being clearly deceptive on the two crtical questions, drugs and sex. The website has dismissed the claims and larry sinclair. They also state that the man would not give them details of the limo driver he promised could corraborate his story. HE LIED - it is quasi-proved.</p>
<p>In terms of Obama, he probably didnt acknowledge it as it would have detracted from his campaign as people&#8217;s reactions would have been less than supporting in a crucial primary season. What helps his innocence is that the primary media have not touched it at all despite knowing about it - they surely would not hold back on a newsworthy (money-making) scandal, I believe it shows that they knew he was ridiculous and slanderous. and i thought you could be charged for creating intentional misleading damage to someone&#8217;s public name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janie</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-240417</link>
		<dc:creator>Janie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-240417</guid>
		<description>Response to autopt, who writes:

"The 1999 Great Lakes Navy Training Center graduation took place between October 17-18, as detailed in the travel diary by these fine folks who actually attended that graduation: www.crabcoll.com/journal/seasons.html."

Instead of quoting someone's diary journal, I went to the Recruiting Training Command, Great Lakes, IL and found out that Division Graduations can be weekly.  See below for this month (Feb. 2008).

Divisions Graduating by Training Group

TG 12 (5) Divisions (077 – 080 &#38; 912) Graduate Friday, 08 Feb 08
TG 13 (13) Divisions (081 – 092 &#38; 913) Graduate Friday, 15 Feb 08
TG 15 (8) Divisions (093 – 098 &#38; 914, 915) Graduate Friday, 29 Feb 08 
TG 16 (7) Divisions (099 – 104 &#38; 916) Graduate Friday, 07 Mar 08
TG 17 (9) Divisions (105 – 112 &#38; 917) Graduate Friday, 14 Mar 08
TG 18 (12) Divisions (113 – 123 &#38; 918) Graduate Friday, 21 Mar 08
TG 19 (9) Divisions (125 – 132 &#38; 919) Graduate Friday, 28 Mar 08

Therefore,the dates could very well be correct. Obama's journals can confirm or deny if he was in Chicago during that time.

I'm not voting for Obama since he is a Communist/Socialist follower.  In his book, Dreams From My Father", the "Frank" he so fondly writes about is Frank Marshall Davis, a known Communist.  Also, he won't pledge to the American flag but will have a Marxist Che flag hanging on the wall of his Houston campaign office next to his picture.  Also, Obama's spiritual adviser and mentor, Rev. Wright, has a greater commitment to Africa than to the United States. And, Wright is a racist and bigot. Obama has distanced himself from Wright but what about his views?  Obama talks about "change" but is it "good" or "bad"? Just change? Sorry, we had change during the Carter years and it took Reagan to get us out of that mess!  The man has no experience... he has been a senator for only 3 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response to autopt, who writes:</p>
<p>&#8220;The 1999 Great Lakes Navy Training Center graduation took place between October 17-18, as detailed in the travel diary by these fine folks who actually attended that graduation: <a href="http://www.crabcoll.com/journal/seasons.html." rel="nofollow">http://www.crabcoll.com/journal/seasons.html.</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Instead of quoting someone&#8217;s diary journal, I went to the Recruiting Training Command, Great Lakes, IL and found out that Division Graduations can be weekly.  See below for this month (Feb. 2008).</p>
<p>Divisions Graduating by Training Group</p>
<p>TG 12 (5) Divisions (077 – 080 &amp; 912) Graduate Friday, 08 Feb 08<br />
TG 13 (13) Divisions (081 – 092 &amp; 913) Graduate Friday, 15 Feb 08<br />
TG 15 (8) Divisions (093 – 098 &amp; 914, 915) Graduate Friday, 29 Feb 08<br />
TG 16 (7) Divisions (099 – 104 &amp; 916) Graduate Friday, 07 Mar 08<br />
TG 17 (9) Divisions (105 – 112 &amp; 917) Graduate Friday, 14 Mar 08<br />
TG 18 (12) Divisions (113 – 123 &amp; 918) Graduate Friday, 21 Mar 08<br />
TG 19 (9) Divisions (125 – 132 &amp; 919) Graduate Friday, 28 Mar 08</p>
<p>Therefore,the dates could very well be correct. Obama&#8217;s journals can confirm or deny if he was in Chicago during that time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not voting for Obama since he is a Communist/Socialist follower.  In his book, Dreams From My Father&#8221;, the &#8220;Frank&#8221; he so fondly writes about is Frank Marshall Davis, a known Communist.  Also, he won&#8217;t pledge to the American flag but will have a Marxist Che flag hanging on the wall of his Houston campaign office next to his picture.  Also, Obama&#8217;s spiritual adviser and mentor, Rev. Wright, has a greater commitment to Africa than to the United States. And, Wright is a racist and bigot. Obama has distanced himself from Wright but what about his views?  Obama talks about &#8220;change&#8221; but is it &#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;bad&#8221;? Just change? Sorry, we had change during the Carter years and it took Reagan to get us out of that mess!  The man has no experience&#8230; he has been a senator for only 3 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-240288</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-240288</guid>
		<description>Obama is the most dangerous man alive in the U.S. today!  His views are hidden from the public because he will not shoot straight about his core beliefs and approaches to government and political situations. He smiles and speaks well but beneath you will find something very sinister. First, his mentor during adult life whom he admires and follows is a member of the Communist Party USA. Check out Obama's book and find the man and his name and look up his background if you don't belive me!  Second, he is still a member and has been a member for a long time in a religious cult which likes the Nation of Islam and Louis Farakhan.  This group preaches hate against Jews and Whites. His retired former Pastor preached the same type of message and Obama liked it or would not be a member of the group!  So Obama is not shooting straight to the people - he cover's this up!  Third, he has been rated as the most Ultra-Liberal person in our Government ever!!  So, he is far to the left of Hillary which means he really is close to being a full fledged Communist if not one already!  These are facts folks and they are easy to be confirmed and checked out! Are is it you don't want to know the truth!  Then, perhaps truth or maybe not, but legitimate charges have been  made by Larry Sinclair and a lawsuit filed against Obama and the Democratic party for harrassment because Mr. Sinclair accused Obama of having homosexual acts with him and snorting Cocaine in his presence in 1999.  Mr. Sinclair has passed a "clean" drug test since he must be clean to have a polygraph test to prove his statements are true and factual.  He has called upon Obama to take a lie dectator test also.  Now, folks, Bill Clinton had several women accuse him of affairs and they were really proven but the Press stated all of this openly  when Bill was in office.  Yet, the Press will not even mention Obama's potential activities in the area of homosexual activity and drug taking with Mr. Sinclair.  Proof isn't needed because it is NEWS and it is a REAL law suit and a real person making the charges!  It is news worthy.  Eventually unless someone does harm to Mr. Sinclair , the truth will come out more over time.  But the Press is  robbing the American people of these facts that are going on and people are voting for Obama who may not do so if they knew of these matters!  There are many other issues such as his wife not a good citizen of this Nation speaking ill of her views of our Nation over her past life, Obama's not wanting to wear a patriotic flag pin, his hiring a foreign relations type person and that person  adivising that Obama and he will work to give aid and weapons to the Palestinian Terrorists and of course that will kill more Israeli's!  Now this man is not  a man who will work for the best interests of this Nation and our security at all.  He needs to be defeated quickly and exposed for his real views and policies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is the most dangerous man alive in the U.S. today!  His views are hidden from the public because he will not shoot straight about his core beliefs and approaches to government and political situations. He smiles and speaks well but beneath you will find something very sinister. First, his mentor during adult life whom he admires and follows is a member of the Communist Party USA. Check out Obama&#8217;s book and find the man and his name and look up his background if you don&#8217;t belive me!  Second, he is still a member and has been a member for a long time in a religious cult which likes the Nation of Islam and Louis Farakhan.  This group preaches hate against Jews and Whites. His retired former Pastor preached the same type of message and Obama liked it or would not be a member of the group!  So Obama is not shooting straight to the people - he cover&#8217;s this up!  Third, he has been rated as the most Ultra-Liberal person in our Government ever!!  So, he is far to the left of Hillary which means he really is close to being a full fledged Communist if not one already!  These are facts folks and they are easy to be confirmed and checked out! Are is it you don&#8217;t want to know the truth!  Then, perhaps truth or maybe not, but legitimate charges have been  made by Larry Sinclair and a lawsuit filed against Obama and the Democratic party for harrassment because Mr. Sinclair accused Obama of having homosexual acts with him and snorting Cocaine in his presence in 1999.  Mr. Sinclair has passed a &#8220;clean&#8221; drug test since he must be clean to have a polygraph test to prove his statements are true and factual.  He has called upon Obama to take a lie dectator test also.  Now, folks, Bill Clinton had several women accuse him of affairs and they were really proven but the Press stated all of this openly  when Bill was in office.  Yet, the Press will not even mention Obama&#8217;s potential activities in the area of homosexual activity and drug taking with Mr. Sinclair.  Proof isn&#8217;t needed because it is NEWS and it is a REAL law suit and a real person making the charges!  It is news worthy.  Eventually unless someone does harm to Mr. Sinclair , the truth will come out more over time.  But the Press is  robbing the American people of these facts that are going on and people are voting for Obama who may not do so if they knew of these matters!  There are many other issues such as his wife not a good citizen of this Nation speaking ill of her views of our Nation over her past life, Obama&#8217;s not wanting to wear a patriotic flag pin, his hiring a foreign relations type person and that person  adivising that Obama and he will work to give aid and weapons to the Palestinian Terrorists and of course that will kill more Israeli&#8217;s!  Now this man is not  a man who will work for the best interests of this Nation and our security at all.  He needs to be defeated quickly and exposed for his real views and policies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autopt</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-239884</link>
		<dc:creator>autopt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-239884</guid>
		<description>I found some info about Larry Sinclair which makes some sense out of something that makes no sense. I found this in a comments post to another slimy blog online:

LARRY WAS ALREADY CAUGHT LYING.

Larry was in a mental institution during 1999.

Larry claims: "I was in the Chicago area from November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999 to attend the graduation of my God son from the Great Lakes Navy Training Center outside Chicago."

So, after looking up the graduation for the Great Lakes Navy Training Center for 1999, and nutjob Larry's God son must have been pretty disappointed that he missed his graduation. The 1999 Great Lakes Navy Training Center graduation took place between October 17-18, as detailed in the travel diaryby these fine folks who actually attended that graduation: www.crabcoll.com/journal/seasons.html.

According to H.U.D. records which are also public, the address Larry gives as a residence is a building with 154 units called Gateway Tower and is a complex for the elderly and disabled; a government subsidized home for the mentally ill and disabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found some info about Larry Sinclair which makes some sense out of something that makes no sense. I found this in a comments post to another slimy blog online:</p>
<p>LARRY WAS ALREADY CAUGHT LYING.</p>
<p>Larry was in a mental institution during 1999.</p>
<p>Larry claims: &#8220;I was in the Chicago area from November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999 to attend the graduation of my God son from the Great Lakes Navy Training Center outside Chicago.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, after looking up the graduation for the Great Lakes Navy Training Center for 1999, and nutjob Larry&#8217;s God son must have been pretty disappointed that he missed his graduation. The 1999 Great Lakes Navy Training Center graduation took place between October 17-18, as detailed in the travel diaryby these fine folks who actually attended that graduation: <a href="http://www.crabcoll.com/journal/seasons.html." rel="nofollow">http://www.crabcoll.com/journal/seasons.html.</a></p>
<p>According to H.U.D. records which are also public, the address Larry gives as a residence is a building with 154 units called Gateway Tower and is a complex for the elderly and disabled; a government subsidized home for the mentally ill and disabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-238999</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-238999</guid>
		<description>Having sex with another man is truly disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having sex with another man is truly disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-238881</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-238881</guid>
		<description>Anyone can say whatever they want, and put it on YouTube. This is called freedom of speech.

But it's so clear this guy is a nutjob, it's sad that people are giving him even a second thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone can say whatever they want, and put it on YouTube. This is called freedom of speech.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s so clear this guy is a nutjob, it&#8217;s sad that people are giving him even a second thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-238818</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-238818</guid>
		<description>OMG,WhiteHouse.com is offering money to get to the bottom of this story. It MUST be true!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG,WhiteHouse.com is offering money to get to the bottom of this story. It MUST be true!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-238137</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-238137</guid>
		<description>Barack has admitted of using drugs already. And having sex with another man is a sign of greatness. DaVinci, MichaelAngelo, Alexander the Great, Jesus and Lincoln enjoyed sex with other men.

Even if true, what is the fuzz about?

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack has admitted of using drugs already. And having sex with another man is a sign of greatness. DaVinci, MichaelAngelo, Alexander the Great, Jesus and Lincoln enjoyed sex with other men.</p>
<p>Even if true, what is the fuzz about?</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eman</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-237665</link>
		<dc:creator>Eman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-237665</guid>
		<description>Some white guy walks into an upscale Bar in Chicago and asks the bartender for a hookup and the bartender just happens to have Baracks number handy as his gay call boy go-to guy?  GIVE ME FRIGGIN BREAK!!!  How can people be so gullible?  The guy is a wachjob through and through....


END OF STORY!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some white guy walks into an upscale Bar in Chicago and asks the bartender for a hookup and the bartender just happens to have Baracks number handy as his gay call boy go-to guy?  GIVE ME FRIGGIN BREAK!!!  How can people be so gullible?  The guy is a wachjob through and through&#8230;.</p>
<p>END OF STORY!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSimulacra</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-237660</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSimulacra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-237660</guid>
		<description>"There have been almost a half million hits on UTube regarding the Larry Sinclair and Barack issue this past week."

How does that matter?  There are videos of cats licking themselves for five minutes that have been viewed by more people on YouTube than that.

"Letters have been sent to Barack, Howard Dean (DNC) and others, by Sinclair to respond. Barack has chosen not to respond (nor nip it in the bud??)."

Obviously you don't understand simple public relations theory.  You don't respond to something that nobody knows about (except on YouTube, sorry I forgot those highly influential and well-read people) because all it does is DRAW ATTENTION TO IT.

"In a recent blog it was said that Novak is waiting to hit Barack with the “LS/BO cocaine/gay sex scandal” after a Hillary loss."

First problem: "in a recent blog"... that translates to "some random person wrote this on the internet"

Second problem: Bob Novak?  Seriously?  That paragon of integrity?  Wow, I'm sure the world is on the edge of our seats just waiting for what he has to say!

"If Hillary knows about this–she is taking the high road–even in the face of losing her run for the White House–and not getting involved!."

She's not taking the high road, she's ignoring it because it's an impossible argument to make.  If she went after him over this publicly (especially since there is absolutely no corroborating evidence of merit, and the accuser is highly specious) she would be reproached by the press, the public, and other elected officials for having gone too far and played to more racial stereotyping and smear tactics.  Her campaign would crumple in a heartbeat.

Where do you people come up with your arguments?  Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There have been almost a half million hits on UTube regarding the Larry Sinclair and Barack issue this past week.&#8221;</p>
<p>How does that matter?  There are videos of cats licking themselves for five minutes that have been viewed by more people on YouTube than that.</p>
<p>&#8220;Letters have been sent to Barack, Howard Dean (DNC) and others, by Sinclair to respond. Barack has chosen not to respond (nor nip it in the bud??).&#8221;</p>
<p>Obviously you don&#8217;t understand simple public relations theory.  You don&#8217;t respond to something that nobody knows about (except on YouTube, sorry I forgot those highly influential and well-read people) because all it does is DRAW ATTENTION TO IT.</p>
<p>&#8220;In a recent blog it was said that Novak is waiting to hit Barack with the “LS/BO cocaine/gay sex scandal” after a Hillary loss.&#8221;</p>
<p>First problem: &#8220;in a recent blog&#8221;&#8230; that translates to &#8220;some random person wrote this on the internet&#8221;</p>
<p>Second problem: Bob Novak?  Seriously?  That paragon of integrity?  Wow, I&#8217;m sure the world is on the edge of our seats just waiting for what he has to say!</p>
<p>&#8220;If Hillary knows about this–she is taking the high road–even in the face of losing her run for the White House–and not getting involved!.&#8221;</p>
<p>She&#8217;s not taking the high road, she&#8217;s ignoring it because it&#8217;s an impossible argument to make.  If she went after him over this publicly (especially since there is absolutely no corroborating evidence of merit, and the accuser is highly specious) she would be reproached by the press, the public, and other elected officials for having gone too far and played to more racial stereotyping and smear tactics.  Her campaign would crumple in a heartbeat.</p>
<p>Where do you people come up with your arguments?  Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-236759</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-236759</guid>
		<description>There have been almost a half million hits on UTube regarding the Larry Sinclair and Barack issue this past week. Letters have been sent to Barack, Howard Dean (DNC) and others, by Sinclair to respond. Barack has chosen not to respond (nor nip it in the bud??). The cable and other media have been asked to suppress the Larry Sinclair story and they are obliging. In a recent blog it was said that Novak is waiting to hit Barack with the “LS/BO cocaine/gay sex scandal” after a Hillary loss.  If Hillary knows about this--she is taking the high road--even in the face of losing her run for the White House--and not getting involved!. But that means if Hillary loses (they will get the disgusting story out at that time) and we will surely be in we for more years of Republicans in the White House. Everyone– please demand that the story be investigated and reported by the main stream media…NOW.. to see if there is any truth to it. Let’s put an end to this truth– or– rumor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been almost a half million hits on UTube regarding the Larry Sinclair and Barack issue this past week. Letters have been sent to Barack, Howard Dean (DNC) and others, by Sinclair to respond. Barack has chosen not to respond (nor nip it in the bud??). The cable and other media have been asked to suppress the Larry Sinclair story and they are obliging. In a recent blog it was said that Novak is waiting to hit Barack with the “LS/BO cocaine/gay sex scandal” after a Hillary loss.  If Hillary knows about this&#8211;she is taking the high road&#8211;even in the face of losing her run for the White House&#8211;and not getting involved!. But that means if Hillary loses (they will get the disgusting story out at that time) and we will surely be in we for more years of Republicans in the White House. Everyone– please demand that the story be investigated and reported by the main stream media…NOW.. to see if there is any truth to it. Let’s put an end to this truth– or– rumor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bryans Fontaine</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235889</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bryans Fontaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235889</guid>
		<description>Joseph Farah is an Arab Terrorist*

Just like that other religious nut - job and shrewd, mendacious cult leader, L. Ron Hubbard,  the Lies of WND’s editor Joseph Farah become ever more cynical and preposterous. Farah’s latest canard regards publishing a story alleging that Barack Obama is gay. 

Fortunately, this sleaze charge, to use WND words, is soundly opposed by this website:

http://www.houstonvoice.com/blog/index.cfm?blog_id=16708

*as in cyber-terrorist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph Farah is an Arab Terrorist*</p>
<p>Just like that other religious nut - job and shrewd, mendacious cult leader, L. Ron Hubbard,  the Lies of WND’s editor Joseph Farah become ever more cynical and preposterous. Farah’s latest canard regards publishing a story alleging that Barack Obama is gay. </p>
<p>Fortunately, this sleaze charge, to use WND words, is soundly opposed by this website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstonvoice.com/blog/index.cfm?blog_id=16708" rel="nofollow">http://www.houstonvoice.com/blog/index.cfm?blog_id=16708</a></p>
<p>*as in cyber-terrorist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOL</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235526</link>
		<dc:creator>LOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235526</guid>
		<description>Polygraphs = Junk Science because anyone can learn to pass them in about a day.  The guy sounded like he was reading from a script, and having trouble with the lines.  Also, did you notice how, in keeping with racial stereotypes, he the "white" guy used "powder" cocaine while Barack, the "black" guy smoked "crack" cocaine, because, you know, all white folks know that when given the opportunity, the blacks will go for the crack rather than the powder.  Sounds like someone used drug-related incarceration statistics to cobble together this fairy-tale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polygraphs = Junk Science because anyone can learn to pass them in about a day.  The guy sounded like he was reading from a script, and having trouble with the lines.  Also, did you notice how, in keeping with racial stereotypes, he the &#8220;white&#8221; guy used &#8220;powder&#8221; cocaine while Barack, the &#8220;black&#8221; guy smoked &#8220;crack&#8221; cocaine, because, you know, all white folks know that when given the opportunity, the blacks will go for the crack rather than the powder.  Sounds like someone used drug-related incarceration statistics to cobble together this fairy-tale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeighinPA</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235324</link>
		<dc:creator>LeighinPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235324</guid>
		<description>Hellooooo Lani, Murray

Your obsession with Sinclair is disturbing. I see you on every blog and you are saying things you cant possibly prove other then the man's financial hardship due to a bout with cancer.

I am going to watch out for you and make sure you are not in danger of harming yourself or others.

Please let it go we worry about you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hellooooo Lani, Murray</p>
<p>Your obsession with Sinclair is disturbing. I see you on every blog and you are saying things you cant possibly prove other then the man&#8217;s financial hardship due to a bout with cancer.</p>
<p>I am going to watch out for you and make sure you are not in danger of harming yourself or others.</p>
<p>Please let it go we worry about you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Done Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235317</link>
		<dc:creator>Done Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235317</guid>
		<description>Larry Sinclair has agreed to take a POLYGRAPH test and all the facts in all his interviews when compared to actual dates match up. Not some gypsy CULT follower of Obama saying they don't match.

OBAMA CULT is over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry Sinclair has agreed to take a POLYGRAPH test and all the facts in all his interviews when compared to actual dates match up. Not some gypsy CULT follower of Obama saying they don&#8217;t match.</p>
<p>OBAMA CULT is over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me boo</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235312</link>
		<dc:creator>me boo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-235312</guid>
		<description>Why can't anybody believe the messenger. Democrats said the Republicans set up a Jew called Monica Lewinsky to accuse Bill Clinton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t anybody believe the messenger. Democrats said the Republicans set up a Jew called Monica Lewinsky to accuse Bill Clinton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-234780</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-234780</guid>
		<description>At first glance I thought it was just plain fun (I can't stand the Obama campaign). After looking at one of Larry's follow-up vids, I didn't think there was any way it could be legit. 

But ... if it's truly bogus, Obama NEEDS to sue this fellow for fraud and address this and get it in front of the public ASAP, because if he doesn't and the MSM never reports on it, the RW will use it through the back door of the 'net and mailings and Barry's gonna be toast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance I thought it was just plain fun (I can&#8217;t stand the Obama campaign). After looking at one of Larry&#8217;s follow-up vids, I didn&#8217;t think there was any way it could be legit. </p>
<p>But &#8230; if it&#8217;s truly bogus, Obama NEEDS to sue this fellow for fraud and address this and get it in front of the public ASAP, because if he doesn&#8217;t and the MSM never reports on it, the RW will use it through the back door of the &#8216;net and mailings and Barry&#8217;s gonna be toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lani</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-234736</link>
		<dc:creator>Lani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-234736</guid>
		<description>Larry Sinclair is back in the spotlight again, with a lawsuit against Obama, a website's offer of $100,000 for proving his claims in a polygraph, and a blogger's evidence that suggests Sinclair lives in a care facility in Duluth, Minnesota - contrary to his previous claims of being a big-spending big shot.**Updated with a link to a recent one hour internet radio interview with Sinclair.**

http://dearmurray.com/larry-sinclair-welfare-recipient/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry Sinclair is back in the spotlight again, with a lawsuit against Obama, a website&#8217;s offer of $100,000 for proving his claims in a polygraph, and a blogger&#8217;s evidence that suggests Sinclair lives in a care facility in Duluth, Minnesota - contrary to his previous claims of being a big-spending big shot.**Updated with a link to a recent one hour internet radio interview with Sinclair.**</p>
<p><a href="http://dearmurray.com/larry-sinclair-welfare-recipient/" rel="nofollow">http://dearmurray.com/larry-sinclair-welfare-recipient/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-234733</link>
		<dc:creator>jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113895#comment-234733</guid>
		<description>People wont touch this story, because they know it's incredibly false. If you look at the people who are even listening to this story or pushing it... is the far right. This is a smear campaign from the Ron Paul supporters. They're upset, and out of touch with reality. They've been trying to smear Obama for the longest time. The guy is a fraud. The guy was featured on a show that believes in conspiracy theorists. So that is why the press wont touch it, because it's as ridiculous as saying that Obama is an alien!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People wont touch this story, because they know it&#8217;s incredibly false. If you look at the people who are even listening to this story or pushing it&#8230; is the far right. This is a smear campaign from the Ron Paul supporters. They&#8217;re upset, and out of touch with reality. They&#8217;ve been trying to smear Obama for the longest time. The guy is a fraud. The guy was featured on a show that believes in conspiracy theorists. So that is why the press wont touch it, because it&#8217;s as ridiculous as saying that Obama is an alien!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
