Comments on: Preventing Campus Shootings 101 http://www.bloggernews.net/113875 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:03:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Concerned http://www.bloggernews.net/113875#comment-255278 Concerned Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:41:53 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/113875#comment-255278 I got a question....What if the students have no idea what to do?? My college has no publicized plan of action, as i know of. I have no idea what i would do if a shooter entered a building and started shooting. What am i to do, run???? Duck and hide?? Shouldn't the student body have at least a simple game plan on how to react?? I got a question….What if the students have no idea what to do?? My college has no publicized plan of action, as i know of. I have no idea what i would do if a shooter entered a building and started shooting. What am i to do, run???? Duck and hide?? Shouldn’t the student body have at least a simple game plan on how to react??

]]> By: Bob http://www.bloggernews.net/113875#comment-235721 Bob Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:00:53 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/113875#comment-235721 In a column posted today, Chuck Norris argues that a lack of religious values contributes to an increase in school shootings. The link is<a href="www.creators.com/opinion/chuck-norris.html" rel="nofollow"> Here </a>. In a column posted today, Chuck Norris argues that a lack of religious values contributes to an increase in school shootings. The link is Here .

]]> By: The Stiletto http://www.bloggernews.net/113875#comment-234176 The Stiletto Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:04:00 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/113875#comment-234176 Well, the first step is to train and arm campus security. Once college admins have gotten over that psychological barrier the next step is to allow trained, licensed professors and students to pack heat because the campus security cannot get there in time to stop multiple murders. One quick-thinking, armed person in the same room as the crazed gunman will do the trick. Well, the first step is to train and arm campus security. Once college admins have gotten over that psychological barrier the next step is to allow trained, licensed professors and students to pack heat because the campus security cannot get there in time to stop multiple murders. One quick-thinking, armed person in the same room as the crazed gunman will do the trick.

]]> By: Laura Collins http://www.bloggernews.net/113875#comment-234150 Laura Collins Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:33:24 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/113875#comment-234150 EXPERT GROUP DISCOVERS 5 REASONS WHY COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES ARE NOT SAFE The SERAPH Research Team, consisting of education and law enforcement experts have discovered five reasons, which create unsafe college campuses. The SERAPH Research Team provides a bi-yearly school safety report for Congress and in 2006 provided an assessment of the “The Virginia Tech Review Panel Report”. 1. Since the Columbine massacre in 1999, police departments across the United States have been training in “active shooter” response. This has been a well-established practice for use in public [K-12] schools. However, our survey of colleges and universities security directors and police chiefs shows that few have had this training. Two reasons were given for this, the first was the cost, administrators did not want to pay for the training and second administrators barred campus security / police administrators from seeking out the training because they did not want a “militaristic campus atmosphere”. 2. College Administrators have no training in security or police operations and as a result micromanage security operations on their campuses. This is problematic because of the obvious delay it causes in response time. In addition, when a college or university has a police department micromanagement by administrators can violate state law regarding obstruction of justice. 3. A proper security audit is vitally important to campus security. However, our survey of security directors / police chiefs indicates that most college administrators will not allow these assessments to be done. Two reasons for this refusal is the fear of liability exposure and the chance that the audit would require changes in management systems. 4. Threat assessment as a science has existed in the United States since the early 1940s. Predication and prevention of violence is a critical aspect of campus security and one that in SERAPH’s experience is seriously lacking on higher education campuses. All Resident Assistants, security / police and department administrators should be trained to identify violent behavior in students, staff and visitors. A lack of systematic monitoring of people on campus contributes to crime. 5. An emergency plan is only as good as the data in it and the ability of key personnel to use it effectively. Training is important for the effective management of an emergency by key personnel. You cannot ask untrained people to do what trained people do. SERAPH Research Team http://www.seraph.net/about_seraph.html EXPERT GROUP DISCOVERS 5 REASONS WHY COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES ARE NOT SAFE

The SERAPH Research Team, consisting of education and law enforcement experts have discovered five reasons, which create unsafe college campuses.

The SERAPH Research Team provides a bi-yearly school safety report for Congress and in 2006 provided an assessment of the “The Virginia Tech Review Panel Report”.

1. Since the Columbine massacre in 1999, police departments across the United States have been training in “active shooter” response. This has been a well-established practice for use in public [K-12] schools.

However, our survey of colleges and universities security directors and police chiefs shows that few have had this training. Two reasons were given for this, the first was the cost, administrators did not want to pay for the training and second administrators barred campus security / police administrators from seeking out the training because they did not want a “militaristic campus atmosphere”.

2. College Administrators have no training in security or police operations and as a result micromanage security operations on their campuses. This is problematic because of the obvious delay it causes in response time. In addition, when a college or university has a police department micromanagement by administrators can violate state law regarding obstruction of justice.

3. A proper security audit is vitally important to campus security. However, our survey of security directors / police chiefs indicates that most college administrators will not allow these assessments to be done. Two reasons for this refusal is the fear of liability exposure and the chance that the audit would require changes in management systems.

4. Threat assessment as a science has existed in the United States since the early 1940s. Predication and prevention of violence is a critical aspect of campus security and one that in SERAPH’s experience is seriously lacking on higher education campuses. All Resident Assistants, security / police and department administrators should be trained to identify violent behavior in students, staff and visitors.

A lack of systematic monitoring of people on campus contributes to crime.

5. An emergency plan is only as good as the data in it and the ability of key personnel to use it effectively.

Training is important for the effective management of an emergency by key personnel. You cannot ask untrained people to do what trained people do.

SERAPH Research Team http://www.seraph.net/about_seraph.html

]]>