An intelligent critic has challenged my suggestion that the Israeli lobby supported our invasion of Iraq and maintains that Israel warned against it. However, there are more subtleties here — as to what the Israeli lobby is and represents. A Google search turned up a number of items supporting my suggestion, but noting the AIPAC certainly does not represent the majority of American Jews or the rest of us — it has a right wing orientation and works in devious ways to achieve its ends. See Juan Cole’s 2004 piece, “AIPAC’s Overt and Convert Ops”
http://www.antiwar.com/cole/?articleid=3467
Here is a quote from same:
“Likud could not make U.S. policy on its own. Its members had to make convincing arguments to Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush himself. But they were able to make those arguments, by distorting intelligence, channeling Ahmed Chalabi junk, and presenting Big Ideas to men above them that signally lacked such ideas. (Like the idea that the road to peace in Jerusalem ran through Baghdad. Ha!)”
My revised comment would be that Israel, as we, has a sharp division between its war and peace makers. The former tend to be the more devious in pursuing their aims.
There are a number of other pieces along these lines such as this from the Washington Post in 2003: “For Israel Lobby Group, War Is Topic A, Quietly”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A63578-2003Mar31?language=printer
I see no long term gain for Israel and real hazards ahead in our sponsoring such stuff either directly or indirectly. Peace is not made by killing people. It comes these days through truth and reconciliation!!
–
“A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope.” (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
–
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OurStupidEconomy
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net















1 user commented in " Did AIPAC Support Our Invasion of Iraq? "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackLet’s throw a few facts into this.
Both Israeli and American diplomatic sources confirmed several times over that then Israeli PM Sharon opposed the US invasion of Iraq. He correctly foresaw that the result would be to open the region to Iranian expansion, and to empower Shiite extremists. Sharon personally traveled to Washington to lobby President Bush against the invasion. When his warnings were rebuffed, Sharon kept his objections to himself so not to offend Bush.
Certainly, AIPAC and other pro-Israel lobbying organizations knew of Sharon’s objections. But they too chose to keep quiet, giving the false impression that they approved of the administration’s policy.
This left the war debate in the American Jewish community totally under the control of the Bush administration. They handpicked men like Paul Wolfowitz to be the spokesman on the issue for the Jewish community. Note that although Wolfowitz may have been born a Jew, throughout this adult and professional life he has always been closer to the Arab world than to the Jewish community.
True that current Israeli PM Olmert is a strong advocate in support of Bush’s war. But not this is despite the open opposition and warnings of Olmert’s own security people. (Note that the Maliki government is one of the most anti-Israel and anti-Jewish governments in the world.) Olmert is really Bush’s lapdog — just ask any Israeli. You think that Israel controls US policy? No, it’s the other way around!
Leave A Reply