<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JFK, Is There A Love Child?</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: trevor bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-1422970</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-1422970</guid>
		<description>well along with the hair and dna samples if there are things like that then why not clone him cause we all know that the goverment knows how to do it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well along with the hair and dna samples if there are things like that then why not clone him cause we all know that the goverment knows how to do it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-1422967</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-1422967</guid>
		<description>wat set oswald off and why he hated kennedy but there was a reason that oswald should be rituquled to day over it ruby killed him so 
'why not drop it but lee must have had a good reason  and i honestly dont blame him.....thank you for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wat set oswald off and why he hated kennedy but there was a reason that oswald should be rituquled to day over it ruby killed him so<br />
&#8216;why not drop it but lee must have had a good reason  and i honestly dont blame him&#8230;..thank you for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-1422964</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-1422964</guid>
		<description>god why so vile and there is no doubt about it lee havrvey oswald did it and i think us as people should be able to know wat exactly happened that day that caused oswald to kill kennedy. them are my thoughts and the wepon used was a itallin carcano shell size 8*52 i know this cause i own a replica of his rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>god why so vile and there is no doubt about it lee havrvey oswald did it and i think us as people should be able to know wat exactly happened that day that caused oswald to kill kennedy. them are my thoughts and the wepon used was a itallin carcano shell size 8*52 i know this cause i own a replica of his rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Fitzhugh</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-232002</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Fitzhugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-232002</guid>
		<description>I disagree with your comment, "but of course the JFK 
conspiracy theorists are having a field day", as the serious 
and seasoned researchers are mostly suspect of the story.  
The story seemingly is unrelated to assassination research 
and its validity could be easily tested by DNA.  There are
many creditable and highly respected researchers from the 
academic community on this subject who tend to be ignored 
and lumped into the now pejorative term “conspiracy theorists” 
or as you say, kooks promoting bunk.  This story, if anything,
draws attention away from legitimate research which continues
but which receives little coverage by the mainstream, except in 
a dismissive fashion.  So let’s get to the bottom of it soon, permit
those journalists with a bend towards sensationalism to pursue it 
to its conclusion, then turn our attention back towards the 
considerable new evidence produced by the serious researchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with your comment, &#8220;but of course the JFK<br />
conspiracy theorists are having a field day&#8221;, as the serious<br />
and seasoned researchers are mostly suspect of the story.<br />
The story seemingly is unrelated to assassination research<br />
and its validity could be easily tested by DNA.  There are<br />
many creditable and highly respected researchers from the<br />
academic community on this subject who tend to be ignored<br />
and lumped into the now pejorative term “conspiracy theorists”<br />
or as you say, kooks promoting bunk.  This story, if anything,<br />
draws attention away from legitimate research which continues<br />
but which receives little coverage by the mainstream, except in<br />
a dismissive fashion.  So let’s get to the bottom of it soon, permit<br />
those journalists with a bend towards sensationalism to pursue it<br />
to its conclusion, then turn our attention back towards the<br />
considerable new evidence produced by the serious researchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Lausier</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-231107</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Lausier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/113808#comment-231107</guid>
		<description>A DNA sample can be obtained easily from JFK on eBay where his authenticated
hair may be purchased. Why doesn't he buy the hair and have the DNA checked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A DNA sample can be obtained easily from JFK on eBay where his authenticated<br />
hair may be purchased. Why doesn&#8217;t he buy the hair and have the DNA checked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
