
Ron Paul is my Congressman. He has been my Congressman for as long as I’ve known what a Congressman is. Like many of Paul’s constituents I didn’t really know much about him other than he was a Republican and a doctor.
It was not until Ron Paul decided to run for President in 2008, that I first began hearing his views. Suffice it say that I was not impressed and found the vast majority of his views to be naive, extreme, and at times completely ridiculous.
Every election has at least one crazy guy in it, but what I started noticing more were the types of people his campaign attracted.
Let’s just say they’re not the kind of supporters you would typically see for a Republican candidate, and frankly not the kind of people a Republican candidate would want support from.
His supporters are often times an odd mix of hippie-types, anti-war activists, communists, anarchists, Neo-Nazi groups, and a few 9/11 Truthers sprinkled in for good measure.
I have wondered for months what it was about Ron Paul that attracted such a repugnant group of supporters. I have asked aloud on this very blog for someone to please explain.
I listened to Ron Paul give numerous speeches and never heard anything that would be even remotely attractive to Nazi hate groups or “9/11 truthers.”
I’ve said on a number of occasions that these crazy people have to know something about Ron Paul that the rest of us don’t.
It turns out they did.
Thankfully, today I finally have my answer. The New Republic has tracked down Ron Paul’s newsletters going back a decade that at one time were quite popular among those who share his unique brand of “Conservatism.”
In the age before blogs, newsletters occupied a prominent place in right-wing political discourse. With the pages of mainstream political magazines typically off-limits to their views, hardline conservatives resorted to putting out their own, less glossy publications.
According to The National Review, Ron Paul’s newsletters were among the most popular during that time period.
What the newsletters reveal is a man consumed by racism, bigotry, and paranoia. After reading the newsletters it’s very easy to understand why Ron Paul attracts such loathsome supporters.
Here are some excerpts from various Ron Paul newsletters from 1978-1997. Be sure to check out the full story with even more excerpts at The New Republic.
Race:
“A Special Issue on Racial Terrorism” analyzes the Los Angeles riots of 1992: “Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began. … What if the checks had never arrived? No doubt the blacks would have fully privatized the welfare state through continued looting. But they were paid off and the violence subsided.”
The November 1990 issue of the Political Report had kind words for David Duke.
This newsletter describes Martin Luther King Jr. as “a world-class adulterer” who “seduced underage girls and boys” and “replaced the evil of forced segregation with the evil of forced integration.”
The January 1991 edition of the Political Report refers to King as a “world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours” and a “flagrant plagiarist with a phony doctorate.”
A February 1991 newsletter attacks “The X-Rated Martin Luther King.”
An October 1990 edition of the Political Report ridicules black activists, led by Al Sharpton, for demonstrating at the Statue of Liberty in favor of renaming New York City after Martin Luther King. The newsletter suggests that “Welfaria,” “Zooville,” “Rapetown,” “Dirtburg,” and “Lazyopolis” would be better alternatives–and says, “Next time, hold that demonstration at a food stamp bureau or a crack house.”
Gays:
In the course of defending homophobic comments by Andy Rooney of CBS, a 1990 newsletter notes that a reporter for a gay magazine “certainly had an axe to grind, and that’s not easy with a limp wrist.”
The June 1990 issue of the Political Report says: “I miss the closet. Homosexuals, not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them to hide their activities.”
From the August 1990 issue of the Political Report: “Bring Back the Closet!”
A January 1994 edition of the Survival Report states that “gays in San Francisco do not obey the dictates of good sense,” adding: “[T]hese men don’t really see a reason to live past their fifties. They are not married, they have no children, and their lives are centered on new sexual partners.” Also, “they enjoy the attention and pity that comes with being sick.”
Anti-Government Militias:
The November 1994 issue of the Survival Report celebrates anti-government militias.
The January 1995 issue of the Survival Report–released just three months before the Oklahoma City bombing–cites an anti-government militia’s advice to other militias, including, “Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here.”
The October 1992 issue of the Political Report paraphrases an “ex-cop” who offers this strategy for protecting against “urban youth”: “If you have to use a gun on a youth, you should leave the scene immediately, disposing of the wiped off gun as soon as possible. Such a gun cannot, of course, be registered to you, but one bought privately (through the classifieds, for example).”
Conspiracies:
In an undated solicitation letter for The Ron Paul Investment Letter and the Ron Paul Political Report, Paul writes: “I’ve been told not to talk, but these stooges don’t scare me. Threats or no threats, I’ve laid bare the coming race war in our big cities. The federal-homosexual cover-up on AIDS (my training as a physician helps me see through this one.) The Bohemian Grove–perverted, pagan playground of the powerful. Skull & Bones: the demonic fraternity that includes George Bush and leftist Senator John Kerry, Congress’s Mr. New Money. The Israeli lobby, which plays Congress like a cheap harmonica.”
So basically what all this means is that Ron Paul is a Timothy McVee, anti-government, hate monger, rather than the elderly gentleman with libertarian views we’ve all been led to believe he is.
I was apparently wrong to give Paul the benefit of the doubt, when I posted pictures of him standing with notorious Neo-Nazi leader Don Black and his Nazi son.
Since the picture was taken at a campaign rally, I said it would be unfair for me to think he had any idea who he was having his picture taken with.
I have serious doubts at this point that it’s all a coincidence that Don Black, and various Ku Klux Klan organizations are Ron Paul donors, and he just mistakenly had his picture taken with Black.
The fact is that over the last 10 years, the various hate groups in this country have been undergoing a transformation. They’ve been trying to blend inconspicuously into society and keep there racist views largely hidden, enabling them to get people elected to office who can change America from within.
The Southern Poverty Law Center which tracks hate groups in America has a great deal of information regarding this transformation.
Whether or not Ron Paul’s intentions were aligned with these groups is debatable, but for whatever reason these groups believe Ron Paul share’s their twisted vision.
In short, this is some scary sh*t.
-Chris Jones
The Hot Joints
webmaster@thehotjoints.com
















19 users commented in " Newsletters Finally Reveal Why Racist Hate Groups Support Ron Paul "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackWhat they reveal…
You didn’t even read the biased tnr article did you?
He didn’t write them. There is no evidence that he did. The writing is not his style. He has said things that are the opposite of what appears in those newsletters and he was practicing medicine at the time since he had dropped out of congress and ran for President as a libertarian in 1988.
ARLINGTON, Va.–(Business Wire)–In response to an article published by The New Republic, Ron Paul
issued the following statement:
“The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do
not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never
uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.
“In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that
we should only be concerned with the content of a person’s character,
not the color of their skin. As I stated on the floor of the U.S.
House on April 20, 1999: ‘I rise in great respect for the courage and
high ideals of Rosa Parks who stood steadfastly for the rights of
individuals against unjust laws and oppressive governmental policies.’
“This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade.
It’s once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the
day of the New Hampshire primary.
“When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a
newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several
writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have
publically taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention
to what went out under my name.”
Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign Committee
Jesse Benton, 703-248-9115
Only The Mentally Minuscule Take Words Out Of Context To Bend Them To Their Preconceived Paradigm.
If you refuse to look at the actions of a man for temperance of judgment then you truly castrate you mind and make it easy to arrive at wrong conclusion.
The weak minded are easily led by the bridle of emotion.
Racism is not consistent with the philosophy expressed by Ron Paul. He has rebutted these accusations from the same distortions in previous days.
Ron Paul is the only candidate that I would trust with my money and my family’s safety.
I Vote For Virtue; I Vote For Ron Paul !!!
All you mud slingers wind up in the mud. You bunch of low lifes
This is old hat. It didn’t stick before, it won’t stick now. The articles were obviously not authored by Ron Paul.
Nice try. Got a problem with the constitution, rights, sound money, peace?
But can’t argue cogently against them? Try attacking the messenger.
It says a lot more about you than it does about Ron Paul.
Press Releases › Ron Paul Statement on The New Republic Article Regarding Old Newsletters
January 8, 2008 5:28 am EST
ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – In response to an article published by The New Republic, Ron Paul issued the following statement:
“The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.
“In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person’s character, not the color of their skin. As I stated on the floor of the U.S. House on April 20, 1999: ‘I rise in great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks who stood steadfastly for the rights of individuals against unjust laws and oppressive governmental policies.’
“This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. It’s once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the day of the New Hampshire primary.
“When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publically taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name.”
Do a google search of jamie kirchick the author of this outrageous crap journalism. find out who he is. he is widely criticized and made fun of by other journalists for not checking his facts. He is a college kid trying to make a name for himself. He has spent the last year attempting to smear ron paul. All of his smears have been proven inaccurate. This is just the latest one for which he had to go way out on a limb saying that ron paul has a secret code language with the skin heads. he actually said ron pauls message may sound like a message for liberty, but it is really a secret code with the skin heads. that is the most laughable smear of his yet. seriously people. he couldn’t even get the first fact of his article straight. he said ron paul was in the army. ron paul is an air force veteran. if he can’t even get this most publicized fact right, how much truth do you think this moron can come up with.
Typical slanderous nonsense. It is a shame that renegade ghost writers define a man’s character more than war mongering, civilian-slaughtering and possession of itchy nuclear trigger fingers. Theft, genocide and endless lies seem to be the new badges of normalcy, while Dr. Paul’s campaign of truth, honor and freedom relegate him to the fringe.
Disgusting.
I absolutely support Ron Paul as an honorable, forthright, sincere, honest man of integrity and wisdom for President in 2008. I have never seen a candidate of such caliber…too bad the sheeple have been brainwashed for so long by the real owners of the country…they can’t recognize excellence when it finally gets into the election process despite all efforts to squelch it.
Sad, Kirchik, sad.
Little whiny monkey rehashes accusations that have been made for years. Some psychos hijacked his newsletter while he was out of Congress, and he stepped up and said “my bad, should have been paying more attention even though I was busy being a doctor”. His views on racism are very clear, and he supports neither white nor black supremacists as they are all collectivist idiots.
Do a little research on Kirchik the apparatchik. He’s a third rate mudslinger. Shame on Tucker for having him on.
Ron Paul supporters, be of stern stuff – of course, they will smear Dr. Paul with such charges – a conservative like Dr. Paul attracts adherents of all stripes and some of them will be racists.
Ron Paul is an adherent of Austrian economics; his economic gurus are Jewish. He clearly states that he believes that people should be viewed as individuals and not as a member of groups based on superficial physical characteristics. He has been very clear on this.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you…
Ron Paul has been my Congressman too. I live in Missouri now but I was born and raised in Texas.
I’m really shocked that this even showed up at the top of my Google Alerts as a legit news source.
I agree with the folks above. This is garbage.
You’ve cut and pasted the EXACT same quotes as every other novice blogger out there, and some were taken out of context, some were proven not to be his.
…”Hippie-types, Anti-war, 9/11 Truthers, Communists”… yeah, these kind of people would gravitate towards Paul because of some under ground racist newspaper.
By the way, anyone who purports to be a Communist is diameterically opposed to EVERY Paul says about the domestic economy.
You’re embarrasing yourself “Chris”. Time to get a job.
Don’t quite your day job. This is probably the most hits you have on an article and its just because you attempt to smear an honest man with many loyal supporters. You suck, Chris Jones.
It’s really interesting to see CNN post this on the day of the South Carolina debate. These stories flooded in on the day of the New Hampshire debate. Wolf Blitzer discussed this with Dr. Paul:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pLUmfZWIZsc
This “news story” makes it appear that this is breaking news although it has been already addressed. Although it attempts to make the appearance that it is balanced, it does Ron Paul more damage than good. For example, the title of the story should be “Ron Paul states that he did not write letters against blacks, gays.” So please explain to me why CNN has re-hashed this story when Wolf Blitzer had already addressed this and Ron Paul has addressed this many times. I hope the motive was not to do damage to Ron Paul instead of report the news.
One of my favorite lines from above is “Let’s just say they’re not the kind of supporters you would typically see for a Republican candidate, and frankly not the kind of people a Republican candidate would want support from.” This to me is hitting the nail on the head not everyone can control where and even why they may be getting support from certain groups. People in general will put a spin on anything they want to make it adhere to their way of thinking.
Everything I have read/watched regarding Ron Paul has been straight forward as far as I can see. As opposed to the other canidates who tend to stutter or answer questions with questions. The mainstream media has shown Paul in such a negative light with none other than information that has already been debated. I find it quite ironic that the same shit as you politely call it keeps circulating during the debates/primary voting times. The above responses have relayed the information that debunk a lot of what you’ve said so I won’t repeat.
The only conclusion I can come to is that Big Goverment has been in place so long that people are affraid of change. That they aren’t going to be getting the handouts that they are accustom to and that they are going to have to become more responsible for themselves. I don’t beleive that there is anything wrong with that other than it will make a stronger America with a sense of self.
Dude!!
You’re full of BS!!
If you don’t like Ron Paul go vote for obama, hillary, guiliani or any of the other neo-cons….
The fact that you need to insult and disqualify Ron Paul AND his supporters says a lot about you…
Patetic…
THOSE WHO DO NOT SUPPORT DR RON PAULUS COMING REIGN OF LIBERTARIAN TERROR IS EITHER A NEOCON, J.E.W OR ON THE TAKE!
Repeat this until you have achieved a pure, doubleplusgood mind. Remember, opposing DOKTOR RON PAUL is thoughtcrime.
On a related note, I bet you faggots were the same who voted twice for Bush and now think you’re saving the world by voting for this pseudo-libertarian, paleoconservative kook. You really don’t know what his actual positions are, do you?
Cerebral, we Ron Paul supporters probably know more about our candidate than any other group of supporters knows about theirs. I know EXACTLY what he stands for, I know what his voting record is like and he is the best pick by far. Oh, but I’m sure you voted for obama the bank puppet. That’s ok though, you’re not the only one who fell for it.
Leave A Reply