The USA (and the rest of the world) is fascinated by the US Presidential election primaries – mostly what’s going on between Hillary Clinton and “upstart” Barack Hussein Obama right now. This is democracy at its best in what is probably the only country left in the world where democracy works (It’s a sick joke in England).
Meanwhile in Africa, Kenya is the latest country to make the headlines – hundreds of people have been killed (some burned alive) in the aftermath of yet another election fraud. Since independence in 1963 this “model of democracy” in Africa has been ruled by a succession of corrupt leaders, all from one tribe (the Kikuyu), for the benefit of their own, Kikuyu people. The other 47 long suffering tribes, led by the Luo (a minority tribe) opposition leader, have finally had enough and Kenya is in turmoil.
Zimbabwe is scheduled to have yet another election rigged in favour of one tribe this year. President Mugabe (of the majority Shona Tribe), after 28 years in power, is likely to be re-elected president. But he’s been smarter than the Kenyan leaders; he’s been conducting quiet genocide, starvation and deprivation against the large minority Matabele Tribe for nearly 30 years. As an ethnic entity the Matabele – once a powerful and proud nation – have been all but destroyed, and they’re far from able to take the sort of action taken by the Luo people in Kenya.
Mugabe is likely to win again despite the fact that he and his cronies have destroyed what was once the most successful and prosperous country in Africa south of the Sahara, barring only South Africa. Zimbabwe’s inflation is incalculable, because of the lack of goods (including food and other basics) in the shops. Education has gone “30 years backwards” (I’d argue more), and students at the University of Harare now have to “fight for a chair, a plate of sadza (staple food), a textbook…”
More than 3 million Zimbabwean people depend on UN food aid. On January 03, the BBC reported that “China ships food aid to Zimbabwe”, much to the delight of Mugabe and his cronies who say that China is a “reliable friend of Zimbabwe”. China has just shipped 5,000 tons of food aid (the UN provides 1 million tons a year – no doubt most of it from the USA and EU). But China gets the praise, while the USA and other western countries are condemned as enemies of the (Zimbabwean) state.
What are western liberals doing about this? Well, the ever-so-politically correct green grocer to the liberals of England, Waitrose have decided to import fish from Zimbabwe because it comes from a “fair trade supplier”. Readers will forgive me for reminding them that Zimbabwe is a landlocked state, where its people are reliant on imported food from the United Nations; England is part of the British Islands and surrounded by fish and food. Yet this British supermarket is importing fish 5,160 miles by air from a country whose people are starving… Yet another example of woolly headed, so-called intellectual thinking from the liberal elite of the west.
I take this opportunity to wish my readers a happy and successful New Year. Please think of those pensioners in Zimbabwe who are short of food, water and other basics.
END
Author, Peter Davies was a soldier in Rhodesia from 1963 to 1975, where he took part in the capture and interrogation of terrorists. His novel, Scatterlings of Africa, is based on his own experience during Rhodesia’s war on terror, and personal observations of how terrorist activities impacted Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) and its people.
Readers who would like to make a contribution to help innocent pensioners, who are unable to buy food and other basic necessities in Zimbabwe, should please contact Patricia Williams by email patashnix@btinternet.com.















1 user commented in " ZIMBABWE - Democracy in contrast "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackI keep hearing people compare the US to Kenya, where allegations of vote tampering have led to riots and renewed tribal hostilities. I understand that we do not face gunfire and gangs of thugs when we vote in the United States. Whether this is better or worse than doing nothing about election fraud (the Al Gore approach) I’ll leave you to decide, but my question is:
Why are we comparing the United States electoral to Kenya, rather than to the European democracies, or to Japan, or New Zealand, or even to Bolivia? Kenya, like most of Africa, is still reeling from the legacy of colonialism, and struggling under the burden of its evil stepchild, neoliberal capitalism. Kenya is a semi-developed country, about the size of Texas, with a narrow economy and a brief democratic tradition. Its middle class is new and small.
The United States is the oldest democracy on Earth, the most privileged nation in history, wealthy and powerful, glutted with information and choices. We couldn’t be more different from Kenya politically. This is not a slight at Kenya – it’s a reality check for people bragging about the United States.
Shouldn’t we instead compare ourselves to England, France, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Mexico, Canada, Israel, and the dozens of other “democracies” (I use quotes here because I suspect our collective understanding of that word are highly variable and vague) that followed, as did the United States, in the tradition of Athens, the Magna Carta, and the enlightenment?
Maybe we compare ourselves to Kenya instead of Norway or even Bolivia because, in the realm of political participation and empowerment of the people, many of the western “democracies” are kicking our American ass, and most of the rest are at least as democratic as we claim to be. Particularly in Europe, there are more active political parties than in the U.S with more representation in government, less regulation of people’s personal lives (though more regulation of commerce), more citizen influence on the course of government (and less by industry lobbies), less dominance by advertising, and more faith in the meaningfulness of political participation – an area where Americans score quite low in every study on the matter.
And understandably so, because:
1. We have so few candidates to choose from
2. We trust none of them completely and few of them at all.
3. We know money has undue influence on politics
4. We doubt our votes are counted properly.
5. We know big business runs the country anyway, and that the market is amoral.
6. We know the bureaucracy of government will continue to move lethargically and soullessly, no matter which party rules.
7. (Most importantly, perhaps) we are given bread and circuses, and see no reason to bother voting. Our lives are comfortable.
Leave A Reply