REXANO Editorial, www.REXANO.org
Las Vegas, NV (12/29/2007)–As expected, the December 25, 2007 fatal, extremely rare and isolated, tiger attack at the San Francisco Zoo is being sensationalized and used by extreme animal rights (AR) activists to incite public fear and hysteria toward captive keeping of exotics.
In the past, it was just the private owners of captive big cats, pet tigers especially, being banned and coming under ever increasing attacks from the media bandwagon, mostly fueled by the agenda of the animal rights (AR) activists groups. Lately, major AZA zoos, who in the past were more than happy to help AR in their slandering of private sector, are coming under the same attack.
Under the guise of pretending to care for public safety and using well meaning, but uninformed grieving relatives of the exotic cat attack victims as their pawns, extreme AR groups hide their real agenda: to end the captive keeping of all animals.
The best method of discrediting the claims of big cats being a public safety issue and to show no need for additional regulation is to look at the real numbers, facts don’t lie.
According to various news sources and reports, 19 people were fatally mauled by captive big cats in the USA in the last 17 years (between 1990 and 2007), which is one death per year (1.11).
One fatality was by leopard, one by jaguar, 2 by lions and 14 by tigers. (The 19th death was an apparent suicide of a woman climbing into lions’ cage at the AZA accredited [The American Zoo and Aquarium Association] National Zoo at Washington DC).
One of the tigers is responsible for the deaths of 2 people, its female owner and male handler. None of these deaths were the result of the exotic cats off the private owners’ or zoo property. Instead, all victims were voluntarily on the property where the animal was kept, be it owner(s), handlers, employees, friends or visitors wanting to see the animals.
Cases Breakdown:
-four fatalities at AZA zoos (1 visitor, 2 keepers, 1 suicidal woman claiming into lions’ cage)
-one teenager voluntarily posing for pictures, famous Haley’s act (where were the parents?)
-three kids, younger than teens, killed by family/relative’s big cat (again, parent’s responsibility)
-two fatalities, adults, cats belonged to their close friend or family member
-NINE were private owners/trainers/handlers/employees/circus performers = Voluntarily Accepted Occupational Hazard
TOTAL:
19 dead, 11 of them were occupational/hobby hazard, (2 AZA zoo workers and 9 trainers/owners).
(AZA is a private accrediting group, so far always exempted from bans).
The odds of being killed by a captive big cat are therefore extremely low. With the current US population being almost 302,000,000 with one death occurring every 13-14 seconds, this translates to approximately 2,440,000 total US deaths per year. With this in mind, the alleged threat of big cats posing a public safety issue seems ridiculous with the yearly odds of being killed by a captive big cat being one in 302,000,000 equaling to one fatal mauling per year.
You have a better chance of winning the lottery Jackpot (1 in 13,983,816, all six winning numbers selected) or even the elusive Mega Millions Lottery jackpot (1 in 175,711,536), than being killed by a captive large cat (1 in 302,000,000). But you must visit someone with a large cat to get those odds. Animal Rights groups demand more regulation and/or banning ownership and exhibition of big cats in the name of public safety. The odds just don’t add up.
More people have died from a runaway NASCAR vehicle than a runaway (escaped) big cat. Shouldn’t we ban racecars?
According to Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), motor vehicle traffic crashes in 2001 killed 37,862 people, of which 4,901 were pedestrians.
Also, wild tigers kill on average 40-60 people per year, even though estimates suggest there are easily more than 5 times as many captive US tigers that the entire wild population.
Even though there is no recorded fatal mauling attributed to the captive mountain lions, there is an increase in fatal wild cougar maulings in the USA, but we don’t see the AR groups supporting population control of these animals to save human lives, just the opposite. These organizations oppose any form of animal hunting, even for overpopulation control.
Assuming responsible exotic animal owners with proper caging, a perimeter fence to keep the animals in and the curious public out and to avoid easy trespassing, the best method to avoid being killed by a captive big cat is to simply avoid the properties where they are being kept. Can you do that with the rest of your daily activities outlined in the statistical table at the end of this article?
Lifetime Odds and Number of Deaths in 2003
TOTAL NUMBERS AND ODDS OF AN ACCIDENTAL DEATH IN THE USA BY CAUSE OF INJURY in 2003 – comparing human fatalities caused by captive exotic and wild animals (average up to year 2006) to deaths caused in the course of a normal daily routine in every day life in 2003.
REXANO only used fatalities numbers since all deaths are reported and there is only one degree of death. Injuries in all walks of life range from life threatening to simple Band-Aid fix and many go unreported. The average life expectancy of 77 years was used to calculate the lifetime odds.
|
Cause of death in 2003
|
Number of deaths per year
|
One-year odds
|
Lifetime odds
|
|
Captive non-human primate |
0* |
0 |
0 |
|
Captive bear |
0.125** |
1 in 2,416,000,000 |
1 in 32,000,000 |
|
Captive elephant |
0.81** |
378,000,000 |
5,000,000 |
|
Captive big/exotic cat |
1** |
302,000,000 |
4,000,000 |
|
Captive reptile |
1.5*** |
201,000,000 |
2,700,000 |
|
Fireworks discharge |
11 |
26,440,910 |
340,733 |
|
Contact with hot tap-water |
26 |
11,186,539 |
144,156 |
|
Flood |
26 |
11,186,539 |
144,156 |
|
Bitten or struck by dog |
32 |
9,089,063 |
117,127 |
|
Earthquake and other earth movements |
32 |
9,089,063 |
117,127 |
|
Struck by or against another person |
39 |
7,457,692 |
96,104 |
|
Lightning |
47 |
6,188,298 |
79,746 |
|
Contact with hornets, wasps and bees |
66 |
4,406,818 |
56,789 |
|
Cataclysmic storm (****) |
75 |
3,878,000 |
49,974 |
|
Animal rider or occupant of animal-drawn vehicle |
101 |
2,879,703 |
37,110 |
|
Alcohol |
373 |
779,759 |
10,048 |
|
Fall on and from ladder or scaffolding |
417 |
697,482 |
8,988 |
|
Drowning and submersion while in or falling into swimming pool |
515 |
564,757 |
7,278 |
|
Firearms discharge |
730 |
398,425 |
5,134 |
|
Air and space transport accidents |
742 |
391,981 |
5,051 |
|
Occupant of all-terrain or other off-road motor vehicle |
906 |
321,026 |
4,137 |
|
Drowning and submersion while in or falling into natural water |
1225 |
237,429 |
3,060 |
|
Fall on and from stairs and steps |
1,588 |
183,155 |
2,360 |
|
Exposure to smoke, fire and flames |
3,369 |
86,331 |
1,113 |
|
Motorcycle riding |
3,676 |
79,121 |
1,020 |
|
Assault by firearm |
11,920 |
24,400 |
314 |
|
Motor vehicle accidents |
44,757 |
6,498 |
84 |
| Source: National Safety Council, National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Census, animal attack news reports
*In 1997 in Atlanta, Georgia, one Yerkes primate researcher supposedly died of herpes B after she was splashed in the eye with bodily fluids from a rhesus macaque; this can NOT be classified as animal ‘attack’, just like a nurse or doctor being accidentally infected with a blood from an AIDS patients can not be called a murder. ** Based on 16 year average 1990-2006 numbers *** Based on 11 year average 1995-2006 numbers (****)Includes hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards, dust storms and other cataclysmic storms. Note: Exotic animal yearly and lifetime odds numbers were rounded due to their extremely large size for the ease of use and quoting purposes in the media and legislative sessions. |
|||















6 users commented in " Captive Exotic Cats and Public Safety… The Numbers Don’t Lie !!… "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackUnless I missed something, Rexano, you haven’t said anything about that young, dead, declawed tiger found on a Texas highway, also on Christmas day. This poor animal was obviously someone’s pet and had become too much to handle, and so the idiot owner couldn’t think of anything better to do than shoot the tiger, wrap him in a tarp, throw him out of a car, and then make a cowardly anonymous call to police informing them about it. This, to me, represents the human-centric, self-absorbed mentality of people who get off on imprisoning wild animals.
Ardeth, you are making a common mistake here, of believing everything the media tells you. What makes you think this was really someone’s pet? Lets reason this through. If you had a pet tiger you couldn’t care for, what would you do with it? If you did decide to shoot it, chances are you would want to give it a decent burial or cremation. Even if had become a handful, or a problem, you would certainly want to dispose of it properly. The last thing you would want to do is create more problem for yourself. So, disposing of the tiger along a major roadway would only serve to bring attention to its existence. So, lets assume here that someone wanted to have a dead ‘pet’ tiger noticed, like a certain sanctuary owner in Texas who wants to make everyone who owns a big cat look like an idiot. So, this person shoots one of their tigers, puts a collar on it, and dumps it along an interstate. Of course, this is done just after a major tiger incident somewhere else, to try and accentuate the negative image of tiger owners. Also consider that this particular sanctuary owner is strongly suspected of having done this before. So, who is the real coward here? It is the person who murdered this tiger simply to make all tiger owners look bad.
So because there may be an irresponsible owner somewhere we should punish everyone who owns a tiger or one of thousands of other species of exotic animals? Anyone who has worked with exotics for any length of time will tell you that the activists are known for dumping dead animals and even cutting cages/fences to allow live ones to ‘escape.’ This is especially true right after a major media flurry or just before a vote. It’s all part of the plan to ban everyone from owning anything that does not conform to the activist definition of a pet. I will believe this animal was killed by an irresponsible owner when he is caught and convicted. In the meantime….the jury is still out.
We have someone in our area that said to be quite adept at ‘finding’ reptiles turned loose by irresponsible owners to further his agenda- which is apparently ego and recognition because there always seems to be a friend with a camera close by….hmmmm. I’m sure they’re (the animals) sacrifice is rationalized as to the good of the cause by many of these extremist- many of them don’t even care what they do to fellow human beings in the name of the ’cause’. Yes, the jury is still out and likely to remain that way since most of this type of ‘case’ goes unsolved. If someone were to have a tiger as a pet I’m sure other than just the owner would know about it and the truth would come out eventually. However, if you have many and claim that good ole superior ’sanctuary’ status no one would bat an eye if one of many were no longer there huh? Who is really in charge of the head count anyway…hmm again.
Ardeth, don’t you realize that members of extreme Animal Rights Activists Groups who have become disallusioned with how far (too far) they will go have admitted to the fact that they raise these animals themselves and then let them loose or even kill then so they can point fingers at “real” owners? This is happening all over the country. Read up!
I do not believe this
Leave A Reply