A Closer Look at the Clinton Campaign Claims of “Experience”
Just What is on the Clinton Resume
Part Two of the Hillary Clinton ‘Experience’
Patrick Healy in the New York Times has written a terrific piece on Hillary Clinton’s “experience” as Bill Clinton’s wife during his two terms as President.
Titled Resume Factor: Those 8 Years as First Lady, Healy writes how Hillary had extensive travel time abroad, meeting with heads of state and other illuminaries. According to Hillary travel time translates into a someone who has the necessary qualifications to handle matters of national security as our next President.
Healy wrote that while Hillary did indeed have facetime with these people during her 8 years as First Lady she was never issued a security clearance. She never attended National Security Council Meetings nor was she ever given a copy of the President’s daily intelligence briefing.
Since Hillary has insisted that her “experience” as First Lady should be part of her “resume” for considering her fit to be the next President, we decided to point out a few of Hillary’s ‘bona fide’ experiences as First Lady.
There are five parts of Hillary Clinton’s resume that bear close scrutiny. The parts that interested DBKP in particular were:
* Hillary Healthcare
* Travelgate
* “Factually” False Vs. “Knowingly” False
* Pardongate: Hillary’s Clan
* Less Than Six Degrees of Separation
* Lincoln’s Bedroom: Hillary’s Hotel for Campaign Bucks
Read rest of story:
The Hillary Clinton Resume: Eight Years with Bill ‘Good Enough’
Source:
The Hillary Clinton Resume: Eight Years with Bill ‘Good Enough’
Mondoreb blogs at Death By 1000 Papercuts. Interested readers can e-mail him at
mondoreb@gmail.com. All DBKP stories are filed under Mondoreb at BNN.
Loading ...
1 user commented in " Hillary Clinton’s Resume: Eight Years with Bill ‘Good Enough’ "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackTop 10 Contradictions in Obama
1. [Obama on Not just change political party but change the game and players in Washington] Then why play the same game at all with the same players whose support he now seeks? Does he realize that while his rhetoric may be ideal, it’s not the pragmatic necessary and urgent issue/call for America at this time?
2. [Obama on the right kind and wrong kind of experience] Obama does not realize that what he has is the POTENTIAL to have the right kind of experience. Unfortunately, now is not the time and the Oval Office is not the place to be earning and learning that experience. No president can be perfect but America cannot go from one extreme (GWBush) to another extreme (BHObama). The experienced person can fail and there is greater probability that an Inexperienced person would fail.
3. [Obama on judgment] One judgment call on the Iraq issue does NOT mean Obama would have good judgments on a gamut of complex issues. From what’s been reported he has avoided making a vote on crucial issues. And he only has very limited experience to showcase an array of judgment calls, which did not even do that except showcase tasks that he did just as he ought to. It’s not a fair claim by Obama.
4. [Obama on the Iraq issue] America does not live by “Iraq” alone. It is not even a simple right or wrong issue. Lucky Obama - the present sentiment is just rendering him to seem right. If he has no concrete and significant experience in the world stage and security matters, it would indeed be a gamble to have him as president.
5. [Obama on the establishment] How can Obama posture to bring a new face and a new way in the establishment when he brings with him a circle of close advisers and staff from the Clinton administration? Employing “Clinton minds” around him means he embraces the Clinton policies.
6. [Obama on his policies] His policies are hybrids from policies that have been strongly initiated by and identified with his rivals. He talks of what’s wrong with past policies and other candidates’ policies but does not have an original policy of his own. He wants people to look only to the future because he has INsufficient past to substantiate the rhetoric he gives in the present.
7. [Obama on hope] It will be unfair to speak of hope that does NOT rest on substance and can NOT stand on a concrete relevant experience to make it happen. That would be tantamount to a manipulation of a people’s desperation.
8. [Obama on triangulation] He is equally guilty of triangulating. Most of the time he draws the first snipe and criticism. Then he complains of negativity when his rivals counter his (and his campaign’s) attacks. And at worst, he speaks in abstracts and generalities which give him room to parse. But his motives remain equally questionable.
9. [Obama on character] Other candidates have been in public eye longer than he has. Naturally there is more to be played up about their faults and failings. But it does not mean Obama has a better character than the rest. He simply is an unknown character. Perhaps his eagerness to be elected now has much to do with that - for time might soon catch up with his closet and be found more lacking in character. If that happens, the presidency would be more difficult for him to win.
10. [Obama on family values] It is good that he has not yet gone through serious marital and family problems. It’s expected given that he’s young and his marriage is new. But there is much more that can be said about family values with Hillary – forgiving an unfaithful husband that mirrors her capacity to heal a nation’s wounds – raising a decent daughter that mirrors her capacity to restore respectability to America – showing personal strength and discipline that mirrors her capacity to be commander-in-chief – keeping generational bonds in the family that mirrors her capacity to inspire bipartisanship.
Obama may be good and experienced enough for Illinois but not yet for America.
Leave A Reply