<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hillary Clinton Experience: Part One</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112664</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MG</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112664#comment-169638</link>
		<dc:creator>MG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112664#comment-169638</guid>
		<description>Reality dictates that we take the good along with the bad. Some have documented the good about the Clintons. Your piece documents the bad. But at the end of the day, each American only has to answer this: After all that's been said and done, did you and or the nation as a whole, reap more and better benefits from the Clintons' service or not? Obama is more like a charismatic preacher. Edwards is more of a radical activist. Clinton has a moderate mix of both. This is not the time to romanticize a crucial decision nor to radicalize it. The bad you raise about Clinton is past and dealt with. It is not fair to keep a nation hostage to scandals. People who hate and crusade on damaging are what render the Clintons polarizing. It's not that they are. They may be faulted for mistakes here or there but on the whole, Bill &#38; Hillary served in a way that made America a strong and proud nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reality dictates that we take the good along with the bad. Some have documented the good about the Clintons. Your piece documents the bad. But at the end of the day, each American only has to answer this: After all that&#8217;s been said and done, did you and or the nation as a whole, reap more and better benefits from the Clintons&#8217; service or not? Obama is more like a charismatic preacher. Edwards is more of a radical activist. Clinton has a moderate mix of both. This is not the time to romanticize a crucial decision nor to radicalize it. The bad you raise about Clinton is past and dealt with. It is not fair to keep a nation hostage to scandals. People who hate and crusade on damaging are what render the Clintons polarizing. It&#8217;s not that they are. They may be faulted for mistakes here or there but on the whole, Bill &amp; Hillary served in a way that made America a strong and proud nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
