<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nataline case: leaving out the facts</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-169166</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-169166</guid>
		<description>From all reports she had been in a coma as a result of complications from prior medical procedures ("vegitative state" according to her mother) for at least 3 weeks prior to her death - she was in that coma at the time a liver was located.

I am deeply skeptical that someone so sick would ever have woken up from their coma, or that she would have lasted even 6 months given the multiple organ failure she was experiencing (she had already rec'd a kidney from a relative)

The main question then becomes do we as a society spend a very rare medical resource (a viable transplant organ) merely to sustain life, when there are plenty of others who could be cured via the same transplant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From all reports she had been in a coma as a result of complications from prior medical procedures (&#8221;vegitative state&#8221; according to her mother) for at least 3 weeks prior to her death - she was in that coma at the time a liver was located.</p>
<p>I am deeply skeptical that someone so sick would ever have woken up from their coma, or that she would have lasted even 6 months given the multiple organ failure she was experiencing (she had already rec&#8217;d a kidney from a relative)</p>
<p>The main question then becomes do we as a society spend a very rare medical resource (a viable transplant organ) merely to sustain life, when there are plenty of others who could be cured via the same transplant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Soy</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-168103</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Soy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-168103</guid>
		<description>One more question: Are you a shill for the insurance companies or are you planning on acting as such in the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more question: Are you a shill for the insurance companies or are you planning on acting as such in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Soy</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-168101</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Soy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-168101</guid>
		<description>Nancy,
Please explain---in detail, not using vague platitudes---how "universal health care via private insurance companies" would A) Cover every single citizen, B) Cover people without enough money to buy a policy, C) Cover ill people or people with a pre-existing condition, D) Still deliver an acceptable return on investment and fat salaries for the executives at the private insurance companies.

I await your detailed, specific response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy,<br />
Please explain&#8212;in detail, not using vague platitudes&#8212;how &#8220;universal health care via private insurance companies&#8221; would A) Cover every single citizen, B) Cover people without enough money to buy a policy, C) Cover ill people or people with a pre-existing condition, D) Still deliver an acceptable return on investment and fat salaries for the executives at the private insurance companies.</p>
<p>I await your detailed, specific response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Soy</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-168091</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Soy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-168091</guid>
		<description>Nancy,
You're right. Insurance companies would never make a decision on the basis of what saves them money and increases their profits at the expense of a patient's health. We all know that return on investment is never a factor when big insurance companies make decisions. They're in business only to help people who need health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy,<br />
You&#8217;re right. Insurance companies would never make a decision on the basis of what saves them money and increases their profits at the expense of a patient&#8217;s health. We all know that return on investment is never a factor when big insurance companies make decisions. They&#8217;re in business only to help people who need health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N. Long</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-167569</link>
		<dc:creator>N. Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-167569</guid>
		<description>Dear Dr. Reyes,
what is an artificial liver?  I've never heard of one before.  I've heard of artificial kidney (ie: dialysis), but I've never heard of an artificial liver.  please explain.  Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dr. Reyes,<br />
what is an artificial liver?  I&#8217;ve never heard of one before.  I&#8217;ve heard of artificial kidney (ie: dialysis), but I&#8217;ve never heard of an artificial liver.  please explain.  Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Farrell</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-167380</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 05:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112654#comment-167380</guid>
		<description>This unfortunate patient probably had hepatic veno-occlusive disease which, when severe, is fatal without a transplant. Transplants in this situation are not always curative but have a reasonable chance of success. Withholding a transplant insures one thing - the death of the patient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This unfortunate patient probably had hepatic veno-occlusive disease which, when severe, is fatal without a transplant. Transplants in this situation are not always curative but have a reasonable chance of success. Withholding a transplant insures one thing - the death of the patient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
