<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Edwards, Rielle Hunter Love Child Scandal: Country Club Concubine</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: NC17</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-169250</link>
		<dc:creator>NC17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-169250</guid>
		<description>Not even to do a massive favor for a presidential candidate who would then owe them if elected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even to do a massive favor for a presidential candidate who would then owe them if elected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tp</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-165802</link>
		<dc:creator>tp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 00:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-165802</guid>
		<description>NCYvonne Says: 
December 23rd, 2007 at 2:06 pm 
"If Edwards wanted a beard for his “affair” he didn’t have to use Young, a married man with three small children, to do it and, therefore, ruin Young’s marriage. There are tons of single men they could have found to take the fall. Young says it’s his baby because . .. IT IS! Nothing to see here. Move along. "

Exactly, Young's wife and kids are humiliated with this story, not just Young.
No married man would willing put his family through this massive amount of negative attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCYvonne Says:<br />
December 23rd, 2007 at 2:06 pm<br />
&#8220;If Edwards wanted a beard for his “affair” he didn’t have to use Young, a married man with three small children, to do it and, therefore, ruin Young’s marriage. There are tons of single men they could have found to take the fall. Young says it’s his baby because . .. IT IS! Nothing to see here. Move along. &#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly, Young&#8217;s wife and kids are humiliated with this story, not just Young.<br />
No married man would willing put his family through this massive amount of negative attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NC17</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164953</link>
		<dc:creator>NC17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164953</guid>
		<description>"Hunter says this is Young’s baby. Young says it’s his baby. She lives in the same gated community with Young. Young leases her luxury SUV. So why do you insist on saying it’s Edwards’ baby?"

Because married family men who have extramarital affairs don't tend to move the other woman into the same ritzy gated community and pay all her bills. Here on Earth, at least. Maybe you do things differently on Planet Silky.

Although maybe the Edwards campaign is taking a page from Ron Paul? Rielle Hunter is the John Edwards blimp!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hunter says this is Young’s baby. Young says it’s his baby. She lives in the same gated community with Young. Young leases her luxury SUV. So why do you insist on saying it’s Edwards’ baby?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because married family men who have extramarital affairs don&#8217;t tend to move the other woman into the same ritzy gated community and pay all her bills. Here on Earth, at least. Maybe you do things differently on Planet Silky.</p>
<p>Although maybe the Edwards campaign is taking a page from Ron Paul? Rielle Hunter is the John Edwards blimp!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mondoreb</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164676</link>
		<dc:creator>mondoreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164676</guid>
		<description>NCYvonne:

"Move along" is what others in NC besides also hope.

Thanks for taking the time to stop by and comment.

Merry Christmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCYvonne:</p>
<p>&#8220;Move along&#8221; is what others in NC besides also hope.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to stop by and comment.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NCYvonne</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164470</link>
		<dc:creator>NCYvonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164470</guid>
		<description>Hunter says this is Young's baby. Young says it's his baby. She lives in the same gated community with Young. Young leases her luxury SUV. So why do you insist on saying it's Edwards' baby? Because that's news. Nobody cares if an unknown married man has an affair and an illegitimate child . . . unless he is a presidential candidate.

If Edwards wanted a beard for his "affair" he didn't have to use Young, a married man with three small children, to do it and, therefore, ruin Young's marriage. There are tons of single men they could have found to take the fall. Young says it's his baby because . .. IT IS! Nothing to see here. Move along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunter says this is Young&#8217;s baby. Young says it&#8217;s his baby. She lives in the same gated community with Young. Young leases her luxury SUV. So why do you insist on saying it&#8217;s Edwards&#8217; baby? Because that&#8217;s news. Nobody cares if an unknown married man has an affair and an illegitimate child . . . unless he is a presidential candidate.</p>
<p>If Edwards wanted a beard for his &#8220;affair&#8221; he didn&#8217;t have to use Young, a married man with three small children, to do it and, therefore, ruin Young&#8217;s marriage. There are tons of single men they could have found to take the fall. Young says it&#8217;s his baby because . .. IT IS! Nothing to see here. Move along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne S</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164349</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164349</guid>
		<description>I am sorry R. Lawson, I was responding to the response from Mondoreb not you, as I wholeheartedly agree with everything you wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry R. Lawson, I was responding to the response from Mondoreb not you, as I wholeheartedly agree with everything you wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne S</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164319</guid>
		<description>R Lawson,
Whos campaign are you aligned with?
Anyone can tell only a person with a vested interest would hold on to this story with such tenacity.

What is most telling is with the Iowa caucus a mere 11 days away, this just reeks of political expediency.

With Obamas admitted drug use, and questionable Muslim links. The Clintons morally challenged tenure in the WH. Guiliani's multiple marriages and mistress's it really appears the General Public doesn't seem to give a hoot, as none of this gains any significant traction. It seems "We the people" EXPECT excessive virility in our leaders. The seduction around power is a known fact. Our reverance for past leaders with wandering eyes has not waned,(think FDR, JFK et all). Boys will be boys and so it follows that powerful boys will have powerful needs.
Stop beating a dead dog, nobody appears to care.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R Lawson,<br />
Whos campaign are you aligned with?<br />
Anyone can tell only a person with a vested interest would hold on to this story with such tenacity.</p>
<p>What is most telling is with the Iowa caucus a mere 11 days away, this just reeks of political expediency.</p>
<p>With Obamas admitted drug use, and questionable Muslim links. The Clintons morally challenged tenure in the WH. Guiliani&#8217;s multiple marriages and mistress&#8217;s it really appears the General Public doesn&#8217;t seem to give a hoot, as none of this gains any significant traction. It seems &#8220;We the people&#8221; EXPECT excessive virility in our leaders. The seduction around power is a known fact. Our reverance for past leaders with wandering eyes has not waned,(think FDR, JFK et all). Boys will be boys and so it follows that powerful boys will have powerful needs.<br />
Stop beating a dead dog, nobody appears to care&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mondoreb</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164244</link>
		<dc:creator>mondoreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164244</guid>
		<description>R. Lawson:

There a number of facts in this story that are not explained away 
by labeling any questions about them a "smear".

Nice try.

Thank you for stopping by and taking the time to comment.

Merry Christmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R. Lawson:</p>
<p>There a number of facts in this story that are not explained away<br />
by labeling any questions about them a &#8220;smear&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nice try.</p>
<p>Thank you for stopping by and taking the time to comment.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Lawson</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164205</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/112604#comment-164205</guid>
		<description>This story is nothing more than a smear campaign.  Shame on anyone who gives any credibility to the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story is nothing more than a smear campaign.  Shame on anyone who gives any credibility to the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
