Where’s the proof to back any of this up?(pictures e-mail,etc )

“i mean clinton we think didn’t father children during his presidency.”

Ahh, now there was a story with actual proof (taped conversations. Linda Trip etc..) not just hearsay.

“so this guy could have a love child secluding his mistress in chapel hill (why’d she suddenly move from nyc to chapel hill???)”

Simple, it’s so Young could be near his mistress when she goes into labor or if she has prenatal complications , you know she is pregnant.

“and now andrew young, edwards’ good friend, claims it’s really his love child and he has 2 kids with his wife who are all just scapegoats. this is relevant.”

Young’s wife and kids planned with Edwards to be scapegoats? Silly.

“i never understood why he continued with his campaign with a very will wife and small children anyway. wouldn’t you want to be with your wife during her last years and he’s a long shot anyway? now it makes sense. he has no committment to her, his children, or anyone but himself cause he’s selfish and has an ego. that is not who i want for president. ”

Wait a minute, that was part of a push poll question targeting Edwards.
Say, what campaign do you work for?

Anyway the entire segment was filmed well over a month ago and of course they sliced it up so we could get our little political fix a few nights a week with the current canidates and Katie asking the tough questions (all fluff).

I heard Bob Schiefer on IMUS yesterday morning and he even said there was no story there. I think he is more or less the voice of CBS News these days.

I think that the EDWARDS campaign needs to either ingnore the problem or take it head on right now because it sounds a little like “SWIFT BOAT” to me.

Maybe you guys should look into the afilliation of the current ownership of the National Enquirer in relation to the current Clinton Campaign, and the former Clinton Administration.

It Just seems odd how EDWARDS is finally getting some coverage in the national media (cover of Newsweek, Defining Moment in TIME) and they are finally talking about his policy ideas rather than hair-cuts. Not to mention he is drawing crowads of 800 in Iowa where the HRC and Obama are only drawing 200-400 without their celebrities.

When Iowans are polled correctly (based on how the caucuses actually work) he wins by a margin of 5%. This was shown yesterday in the “insider poll” which actually does what polling should do and that is take into account what is really happening with actual caucus goers and their precincts in relation to Iowas state party conventions. The ABC, USA Today, WSJ, TIME, CNN, Gallop polls are off because when they want to count apples when they are actually counting oranges instead, and they don’t even know it. This is why the Iowa polls rarely get it right when trying to pick a winner. They will be wrong about Iowa again this year it will be EDWARDS, OBAMA, HRC unless this story does what the plants want it to do and make the real canidate of change look like a bum.

“I think that, as you point out, there have been American presidents that at least according to the … stories we’ve all heard, that were not faithful, that were in fact good presidents. So I don’t think it controls the issue.”

–John Edwards this evening with Katie Couric on CBS Evening News
—————-

Uh, maybe you should have pointed out that she asked the same question to every candidate? I guess that would have required a bit of integrity on your part. And you wouldn’t then have been able to run your misleading headline, “John Edwards, Rielle Hunter Love Child Scandal: CBS Now Interested?”.

I’m not even an Edwards supporter, but your post is B.S.

This week Edwards gains momentum again, is on the cover of Newsweek, and
and gaining steam and polls, and suddenly the Enquirer runs another story.

When Edwards becomes more relevant (i.e. marketable) the Enquirer
decides it is time to cash in: for shame Enquirer!

News of Edwards rising in the polls is quickly followed by this “investigation” executed by that pillar of journalistic integrity, the National Enquirer.

Give me a break. I was born at night…not last night.