Comments on: Rielle Hunter, John Edwards Love Child Scandal: 10 Things We Now Know

By: Darrell

Darrell — Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:04:02 +0000

“High quality English reporting,” huh? I don’t know how credible a claim that is, seeing as you’ve yet to report on the Enquirer’s breaking story of Hillary Clinton’s decision to run with Sasquatch in the VP slot. (No word if Bill’s coveted endorsement from the Martians is carrying over.)

By: Simon Scowl

Simon Scowl — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:10:33 +0000

I know that if I fathered a child outside of my marriage, I’d move the mother into the same gated community where I live with my wife and family. Just a few streets away! It makes perfect sense.

By: Oscar

Oscar — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:06:37 +0000

Yes, you are right: Edwards ALREADY made a statement on this. It would be foolish to repeat the same thing over and over, and dignify a rag like the Enquirer.

By: Lee Ward @ Wizbang Blue

Lee Ward @ Wizbang Blue — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:31:59 +0000

Edwards made a statement back on October 11, 2007 denying this whole “affair.”

The Associated Press reported this evening that Edwards told reporters, “The story is false. It’s completely untrue, ridiculous.” He said the story was “made-up.”

“I’ve been in love with the same woman for 30-plus years,” Edwards added, about his wife Elizabeth, who is suffering from incurable cancer, “and as anybody who’s been around us knows, she’s an extraordinary human being, warm, loving, beautiful, sexy and as good a person as I have ever known. So the story’s just false.”

By: Oscar

Oscar — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:09:06 +0000

This is silly.

All of the “sources” ans people who “wonder this” or “wonder that”
are ANONYMOUS.

An “anonymous ‘friend.” All unsubstantiated. There is not one
individual who is actually saying anything about his. There is not one
person who is actually talking.

We are being asked to believe an incredible story based upon
no one’s word.

I would be more likely to believe something if there were an
actual person making these allegations.

By: mondoreb

mondoreb — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:45:15 +0000

framecop:

Thanks for your comment!

I’m going to reference your comment, because others have written that the Enquirer is a Clinton campaign tool.

Actually, “Bat Boy” was a staple from Weekly World News, a National Enquirer knock-off. The Enquirer’s record in political scandal isn’t too bad. I guess like everyone else, we’ll wait and see.

Until then, I guess you’ll write what you see and hear, just as I do.

Thanks once again for taking the time to comment.

By: framecop

framecop — Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:30:46 +0000

First of all, THERE IS NO SCANDAL, anywhere but in your hopes and dreams.

Secondly, when are we going to find out the names of Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton’s “LOVE CHILDREN”, since the same company that owns the National Enquirer and the Globe both have printed stories every campaign that SOME CANDIDATE has a love child, somewhere?

What about Hillary Clinton’s lesbian relationships, according to the National Enquirer?

Is John Edwards’ love child actually “Bat Boy”?