From The Gathering Storm Blog

I know. I almost threw my mouse across the room too when I read the headline. This is what passes for academic thinking in the country. Poor. Piss poor.

 
Who is this effetist clown? His name is Dr. Kevin Jaques also known as of the Three Mosqueteers and one of the three academics who are helping architect Paul Murdoch to plant a terrorist memorial mosque on the Flight 93 crash site. He was most central to the Park Service’s fraudulent internal investigation.

 
Here’s the professor’s analysis of what our response should have been to 9/11.
 

Shortly after 9/11, Indiana University School of Law sponsored a forum on the likely legal fallout from the attacks: consequences for immigration law, civil rights,
etcetera. As the university’s resident expert on Islamic (sharia) law,
Jaques was invited to say something about our looming engagement with the
Islamic world and their systems of law.
 
He chose to write a prescriptive article, urging the United States to frame its response in
conformity with traditional Sharia requirements.
 
Jaques makes the basic arguments for submission that any anti-war
multiculturalist might make. He offers an appeasement pitch:
 
If the United States wishes to approach the fight against terrorism
to limit future revivalist terror groups from forming and attacking
American citizens and interests, it will be necessary to craft a response
that conforms to the realities of Islamic law.
 
And he offers a when-in-Rome pitch:
 
Muslim religious leaders think of the world in legal terms and will
react to U.S. policies according to how these policies conflict or
adhere to Islamic legal principles.
 
Of course we should avoid gratuitous offense, when in Rome
(just as we should practice it as a pastime at home). But should we
really submit to sharia law?
 
Nowhere does Jaques even acknowledge that world-wide submission to
sharia law is the ultimate goal of the 9/11 terrorists.

 This kind of muddied, fuzzy thinking is not new to liberals. It’s just the way they think – unable to place cause and effect together. Even when the answer is given to them by those they seek to understand in their context.
 
Take the idea that we can deal with Islamic nations by finding out what they want and seek to negotiate with them. But there are any ‘nations’ in Islam as we see define them. Islam is a pure nation unto itself and is ruled by Sharia law. The nation of Islam recognizes no other law than the Koran. And the Loran teaches that Islam must rule the world in order to attain peace – the peace one has under total submission to Allah and the nation of Islam.
 
To quote Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the new Islamic reformation.
 
We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.

 
How do you negotiate with that?
  
Get a FREE TRIAL COPY of the The Gathering Storm eBook which includes the Forward by Walid Shoebat, Introduction, and first 50 pages of The Gathering Storm eBook. And sign up for my free WEEKLY STORM REPORT and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

Be Sociable, Share!