Comments on: Lori Drew, Megan Had it Coming: All Big Internet Stories Start As Local Ones http://www.bloggernews.net/112264 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Thu, 24 May 2012 20:08:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Danny Vice http://www.bloggernews.net/112264#comment-152892 Danny Vice Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:12:29 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/112264#comment-152892 We have a county prosecutor and a defense attorney who have gone on the record with statements that flat out rewrite history and previous statements. If we were to believe that the statements Lori Drew is now making are truthful, and the police report she filed in Nov. 2006, was incorrect, then Lori Drew should be prosecuted for filing a false police, making a false statement or obstruction of justice. Lori Drew, through her attorney Jim Briscoe has made the following statement: "Everything, as far as Mrs. Drew knew, was that all the communication was nice and polite and there was no harassing going on. She did not create the MySpace account. She did not instruct anybody to create the MySpace account. She never made any communications through the MySpace account." Well alright Lori, now that you've completely absolved yourself from the case in any way, shape or form, please explain how this squares with your previous statements. When it all comes down to it, we simply don't believe you. We'll take the officer's account of what you said above what your attorney says. He was not being paid to defend you. Jack Banas, we are calling for charges in this case one way or another. Either the women did stalk this child, or she made knowingly false statements to the police prior to the surfacing of this report. You cannot absolve this woman of complete wrong doing on both sides of the fence. Pick a side or step down and let someone take over who can. Too many admissions have been publicly made for you to continue to hide under your desk. Danny Vice http://weeklyvice.blogspot.com We have a county prosecutor and a defense attorney who have gone on the record with statements that flat out rewrite history and previous statements.

If we were to believe that the statements Lori Drew is now making are truthful, and the police report she filed in Nov. 2006, was incorrect, then Lori Drew should be prosecuted for filing a false police, making a false statement or obstruction of justice.

Lori Drew, through her attorney Jim Briscoe has made the following statement:

“Everything, as far as Mrs. Drew knew, was that all the communication was nice and polite and there was no harassing going on. She did not create the MySpace account. She did not instruct anybody to create the MySpace account. She never made any communications through the MySpace account.”

Well alright Lori, now that you’ve completely absolved yourself from the case in any way, shape or form, please explain how this squares with your previous statements.

When it all comes down to it, we simply don’t believe you. We’ll take the officer’s account of what you said above what your attorney says. He was not being paid to defend you.

Jack Banas, we are calling for charges in this case one way or another.

Either the women did stalk this child, or she made knowingly false statements to the police prior to the surfacing of this report.

You cannot absolve this woman of complete wrong doing on both sides of the fence. Pick a side or step down and let someone take over who can. Too many admissions have been publicly made for you to continue to hide under your desk.

Danny Vice
http://weeklyvice.blogspot.com

]]>