<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another shot at the Second Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggernews.net/111872/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/111872</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Jewish Master</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/111872#comment-134398</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Jewish Master</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernews.net/111872#comment-134398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post.  I would prefer to not have the SCOTUS involved in this case.  There has been great work at the grassroots level (lawsuits thrown out, Castle Doctrine, concealed carry).  These genies in black will come up with some tortured decision, and add more confusion, not less.  I have trouble being an optimist on this one.

I adding you to my blogroll today (exciting, I know)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I would prefer to not have the SCOTUS involved in this case.  There has been great work at the grassroots level (lawsuits thrown out, Castle Doctrine, concealed carry).  These genies in black will come up with some tortured decision, and add more confusion, not less.  I have trouble being an optimist on this one.</p>
<p>I adding you to my blogroll today (exciting, I know)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
