http://www.bloggernews.net/111867 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:04:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.bloggernews.net/111867#comment-1466214 martin Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:41:45 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/111867#comment-1466214 It was interesting watching the nobel prize winning scientists be interviewed at a round table by the BBC. The interviewer stars with "Are there ant skeptics here?" On e of the scientists pointed out that they were all physicists and chemists and economists and that none of them were climate scientists. However as scientists they had a belief in the scientific method and so were prepared to believe what other parts of the process put forward by using this process. We are all in this position of 'who to believe' . Personally I know that I hope that the skeptics will be proven right but the science is not looking good. The Ernst-Georg Beck graph has been roundly discredited and it's only peer review was in E&e which is also rather dubious cheers It was interesting watching the nobel prize winning scientists be interviewed at a round table by the BBC. The interviewer stars with “Are there ant skeptics here?” On e of the scientists pointed out that they were all physicists and chemists and economists and that none of them were climate scientists. However as scientists they had a belief in the scientific method and so were prepared to believe what other parts of the process put forward by using this process.
We are all in this position of ‘who to believe’ . Personally I know that I hope that the skeptics will be proven right but the science is not looking good. The Ernst-Georg Beck graph has been roundly discredited and it’s only peer review was in E&e which is also rather dubious
cheers

]]> http://www.bloggernews.net/111867#comment-1461318 Mike McEwen Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:33:10 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/111867#comment-1461318 Drew Phillips obviously is a Kool Aid drinker - pay him no mind. The CRU whistleblower has changed the game; even the uninformed are beginning to go "huh? watts up with that?". Copenhagen is reeling from the airing of the truth behind Globull Warming, that is , that there is none. It's all fraud perpetrated by Jones, and Mann, and Hansen et al. There will be lawsuits, and some of these false scientists will be heavily fined or do jail time for their part in the scam. The 19,000 studies that Phillips relies on are all dependent on the cooked temperature figures [oops, I mean "adjusted"] from the CRU and GISS and even NOAA. Check out the Earth Radiative Balance Experiment results; the demonization of CO2 is disproved. The computer models are a joke [read HARRY_READ_ME.txt]. Please, educate yourselves at Watts Up with That, Climate Audit, smalldeadanimals, ICECAP, Climate Depot and others. Then write your MLA, MP, Minister Prentice, and PM Harper, and demand that they disavow this Euroweenie power play. Mike McEwen Drew Phillips obviously is a Kool Aid drinker - pay him no mind. The CRU whistleblower has changed the game; even the uninformed are beginning to go “huh? watts up with that?”. Copenhagen is reeling from the airing of the truth behind Globull Warming, that is , that there is none. It’s all fraud perpetrated by Jones, and Mann, and Hansen et al. There will be lawsuits, and some of these false scientists will be heavily fined or do jail time for their part in the scam. The 19,000 studies that Phillips relies on are all dependent on the cooked temperature figures [oops, I mean “adjusted”] from the CRU and GISS and even NOAA. Check out the Earth Radiative Balance Experiment results; the demonization of CO2 is disproved. The computer models are a joke [read HARRY_READ_ME.txt]. Please, educate yourselves at Watts Up with That, Climate Audit, smalldeadanimals, ICECAP, Climate Depot and others. Then write your MLA, MP, Minister Prentice, and PM Harper, and demand that they disavow this Euroweenie power play.
Mike McEwen

]]> http://www.bloggernews.net/111867#comment-133758 drew phillips Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:27:43 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/111867#comment-133758 19,000 studies -- I repeat 19,000 studies -- were reviewed by countless bureucrats representing 130 countries of every political stripe. It is a minor miracle that these counties could come to any concensus at all, but they did and that should tell you that the science and observations for global warming is overwhelming. You may trot out the occasional scientist and attribute to him any number of statements, but I have as yet seen one piece of peer-reviewed evidence to refute what these 2500 scientists have said. 19,000 studies — I repeat 19,000 studies — were reviewed by countless bureucrats representing 130 countries of every political stripe. It is a minor miracle that these counties could come to any concensus at all, but they did and that should tell you that the science and observations for global warming is overwhelming. You may trot out the occasional scientist and attribute to him any number of statements, but I have as yet seen one piece of peer-reviewed evidence to refute what these 2500 scientists have said.

]]>