Apparently, fraudsters are now able to clone some payment cards, assign a new PIN — and it appears that the customer’s old PIN was used when the bank reviews the transactions.
Card Guide (UK) is reporting:
The Chip and Pin technology that has been in use in the UK over recent years is supposed to be practically fraud proof, but this is not the case, as thieves can clone cards and put a new PIN number onto the card – this is known as a YES card.
However, it appears to the bank that the original card and PIN have been used, and therefore banks claim that either the customer carried out the transaction themselves or they gave their PIN number to someone or were careless with the security of their PIN.
Card Guide story, here.
There have been many instances, where payment card thieves were able to get card details, along with the PIN numbers. It can happen to just about anyone, even when they are being careful.
If you have had a fraud claim denied because the bank claims you were careless, you might want to read about instances (substantiated), where PIN details were stolen using pretty sophisticated methods, here.
Of course, there are and always have been people, who try to claim fraud for their own financial advantage. Because of this, it seems some innocent people are getting their claims denied (my opinion).
Figuring out, who is guilty of this is getting harder all the time.
My guess is that with all the fraud involving payment cards, it’s no longer an expense the banks can continue to write-off as a cost of doing business.
Banks denying claims because they say a customer compromised their own information is nothing new.
One example of how this happens can be seen on BankofAmericaSucks.com, here.
I guess all the zero liability ads we see all the time aren’t exactly one-hundred accurate?
If you have wrongfully had a claim denied, I’ve seen individuals made whole by escalating the matter with the financial institution. In some instances, using a consumer advocate was necessary.
On a final note, in most businesses, the cost of fraud is passed off to everyone, when we pay more for goods and services. The truth is we are all held liable for the cost of fraud!
















2 users commented in " Payment card fraud victims being denied compensation "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackBanks are boosting identity and ATM fraud by not implementing ID KEY system described on website http://www.xwave.co.uk which will reduce card fraud, cheque fraud , mail order fraud, ATM fraud and identity fraud to VIRTUALLY ZERO permanently simply by making signature and PIN number systems reliable.
Fake documents have made signature system unreliable but ID stickers will enable us to personalise them like passports to make these signatures reliable again.
Skimmers and pin-hole cameras have made ATM transactions unreliable but use of Card Key Code stored on ID KEY required to activate ATMs will make ATM transactions reliable again. This system will make use of stolen and skimmed cards meaningless.
This shows that if banks implement ID KEY system we will not have to prosecute organisations for failing to protect our personal and card details since these details will not get misused.
ID KEY can be treated like international ID card since it will personalise signature and PIN number to only right individual anywhere in the world. Just like banks even the Government fail to appreciate this unique advantage of ID KEY system.
I am a victim of Card & Pin fraud and Barclays is dening fraud compensation.
After corresponding with Bank for last 7 months, I am now passing my case to Financial Ombudman service.
To me it looks they have not investigated the fraud at all and wasted 7 months on passing the same compalin from one section to other.
When asked them to send me detailed fraud investigation they have carried out.
They say the same thing, ” that frudster will have had to of returned the card to the place they were stolen from ” hence fradulent transections on my account are cannot be accepted as fraud.
If they had investigated the fraud seven months ago , when we reported the fraudulent transection, they would have caught the fraudster BUT instead they wrote letters and asked us to identify us twice by visiting the bank with some proof of our identity.
There were roughly 18 transection on one day and of that there were 4 transections at London transport. i would have thought london transport would have had CCTV plus full transections details as well, from which they could have caufght the frauderster.
But I think they never did the investigation and to me it seems that is what they do with most fradulent transections.
So my conclusion to general public is :-
Caution Barclaycard “Card & Pin” users
you will be liable for any fradulent transections.
They are denying their responsibility and passing the buck to Card user.
If any one who has been in the same setuation like mine please e-mail me and i wish to take this matter further.
Leave A Reply