Do tougher measures on illegal immigration really work? You better believe it! At least in Prince William County Virginia. After a marathon meeting of the county board, which resulted in an eight-to-nothing vote recommending severe restrictions on services available to illegal immigrants, illegal Latinos began moving out of the county in droves. The Washington Post reported in yesterday’s editions [October 21] that “one-way rentals on U-Haul trucks have jumped from 10 a month in July to about 40 a month today.”
The new rules empower police to ask residents if they are legal U.S. residents and, if they are not, to arrest them and turn them over to federal immigration authorities for deportation. The county board also voted to create a new police unit to deal exclusively with the crisis of illegal aliens in Prince William County. The county is a suburban enclave of Washington, D.C., an area with a high percentage of illegals from Mexico, El Salvador, and Guatemala.
With the influx of illegal immigrants to the area have come corresponding incidents by Latino street gangs and a serious drain on area resources. Prince William County is a microcosm of what is happening in other cities, especially New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago. In Los Angeles, according to The National Review, 95 percent of the outstanding murder warrants are for illegal aliens. One Los Angeles street gang, “18th Street,” has more than one gang member for each of the 17,000 Los Angeles police officers.
Even the “benign” illegal immigrants are having a toxic effect on many of the communities where they settle. A study by The Heritage Foundation (”The Cost of Illegal Immigration”) says the illegals do more than depress wages and reduce the number of jobs available to legal workers. In many communities, illegal immigrants are entitled to attend area schools, and receive treatment in hospital emergency rooms (more than $1 billion a year in California is spent on health care for illegals). Even if the illegal immigrants are paying taxes, they fall far short of paying a fraction of the cost of providing the services they use.
The debates in Prince William County, Virginia also brought out the fact that the native population of the U.S. is aging and retiring at a rate never before seen. Millions of illegal immigrants (the number varies from eight to 12 million according to The Wall Street Journal) “can seriously influence the economic dependency ratio of productive workers to retirees if they are able to access the social services of the U.S.” This, according to a recent study by researchers at North Carolina Wesleyan College. In addition, the scholars note, “There is the problem of an informal, underground economy. It is closely connected to such things as our inflation rate, fiscal and monetary controls, our standard of living index, and our quality of life.”
The college study points out that while Texas has the largest population of settled illegal immigrants, it has not been the place for new illegal entries in recent years due to Border Patrol activities. Which is another way of saying that where anti-illegal immigration measures are enforced, fear of arrest and deportation for actionable crimes makes other venues more attractive. And in the case of Prince William County, the illegals are not merely moving to the neighboring state. Many are returning to their country of origin. The Washington Post cited a day laborer who entered the U.S. illegally 18 months ago, settled in Prince William County, Virginia, and has suddenly booked a flight back to his home in El Salvador. An English language “academy” in the county boasted 350 students in July. That number has since dropped to 60.
Chronicles magazine notes that the Census Bureau predicts that at current immigration levels, there will be a 56 percent increase in the U.S. population by 2060. New immigrants and their descendants will account for 63 percent of that increase. In addition to the influx of millions from Mexico and South America, immigrants from the Middle East alone will increase by 2.5 million. Then there is the additional inflow from the Indian subcontinent - India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.To those who say open the borders, we’ll find room, they may be quite correct. Regardless of your position on immigration limits, it may in fact be far too late to stop the free ride. There are vast areas of the U.S. that are currently unpopulated or underpopulated that could become the new domiciles of the waves of legal and illegal immigrants yet to come, say the open gaters. The recent laws passed by Prince William County, Virginia are predicted to be short-lived, either to be struck down as unconstitutional, or simply unenforceable.Mark Raab, a professor at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, has already thrown in the towel: “We should remember that America has proven to be a resilient society, despite periodic immigration controversies. The latest wave of immigration seems as likely to assimilate to American ways as those of the past. And, if the past is a guide, we can probably count on the descendants of today’s newcomers to launch their own immigration debates.” [Kansas City Star, October 19, 2007]
What all of this portends is neatly summed up in the Chronicles article noted above: “Far from enhancing America’s diversity, the coming deluge threatens to impose a numbing Third World sameness, to eradicate the remnants of this country’s identify, and to demolish what survives of her special character.”














4 users commented in " Illegal Immigration? Not now…I’m busy! "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackExcellent article with facts to back it up.
You cannot beat the collective wisdom of 300 million Americans.
We said in 1986 if there were amnesty, there would be a deluge
of illegal arriving. True.
We said if you enforce the border, there will be a decrease in
illegals.True.
We said illegals are NOT a positive force in our society, they
are draining resources. True.
We said illegals have brought in crime. True
We said illegals are taking jobs from Americans. True.
We said illegals are not integrating. True
We said you take away benefits and enforce the law, they will
self deport. True.
Too bad our politicians have decided to turn a deaf ear, they
are too busy listening to dishonest business (repubs), and
part of the Hispanic American vote they are pandering to, (DIPs-
Democratic Illegal Party, formerly known as the Democratic Party)
THROWING IN THE TOWEL, what is that about Mr Raab are you a n american? Good thing you were not a spokesman in other difficult times of our country. We have to start by firing congressmen that do not listen to their constituents, 8o% of us are against amnesty. Laws should be made by elected reps not appoint judges. Does the Aclu ever hire lawyers with eastern european names?
does giving drivers licence to illigals without proper papers make them better drivers. do they stop driving drunk,do they stay on the scene of an accident,. its beyond me how free driving license makes a better driver than they were before. it appears to me that it is just one less ticket for the officer to write. they are still not going to appear in court, address is wrong. free again to do as they have been doing.
ALERT!!
DREAM Act Amnesty Back on the Agenda!
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has invoked Rule 14 on the new stand-alone DREAM Act amnesty! A massive amnesty for illegal aliens is probably coming up for a vote Wednesday 10/24 in the Senate.
That means he is setting up Senate procedure to spring the amnesty at any time without hearings or committee action. For the Majority Leader to invoke Rule 14 means that he can bring a bill to a floor without it going through the debate and markup of a committee.
Join http://www.numbersusa.com to send free faxes!
http://www.fairus.org
http://www.alipac.us
The DREAM Act allows illegal “teens” to petition for their parents, leading eventually to their aunts, uncles, grandparents and cousins:
The big argument for this amnesty is that it is for teenagers who are here illegally because their parents broke the law. Even with the new “less-than-30? age requirement, far more than teens can get this amnesty (and Sen. Durbin has included “humanitarian” and “family unity” exceptions to the age limit).
Nonetheless, the argument is that the teenagers should not be punished for the crimes of their parents. But as soon as DREAM amnesty citizens are over 21, they can bring in their parents who broke the law to get them into the country. The chief criminals will be rewarded after all. And because of Chain Migration, the amnestied “teens” can see their aunts, uncles, cousins and grandparents getting permanent U.S. residency as well.
The DREAM Act does not Protect Americans from Terrorists and Criminals:
Illegal immigrants are not required to submit fingerprints or undergo background security checks at any point in the DREAM Act process. Therefore, DHS has no way of learning whether an alien seeking DREAM Act amnesty is a terrorist or criminal. This security failure is compounded by the confidentiality section of the DREAM Act, which is a relic from pre-9/11 days (it’s modeled on the fraud-prone 1986 amnesty). This section basically requires DHS to hide information about terrorist and criminal aliens from itself. If a DHS adjudicator at USCIS learns from a DREAM Act application that an alien poses terrorist or criminal concerns, the adjudicator is prohibited from alerting ICE enforcement officers at DHS, and in fact, if the adjudicator did volunteer such information to ICE, he could be fined $10,000. To cap it all, DHS is prohibited from removing from the United States all aliens, including criminals, terrorists, fraudsters, and other ineligible aliens while they have a DREAM Act application pending, even if that application is based upon fraud or the alien is ineligible.
The DREAM Act Offers Citizenship to Illegal Aliens Who Lack Good Moral Character:
The DREAM Act does not require that aliens have a history of good moral character; it only requires that they have good moral character from the time that they apply. This means that criminal aliens, terrorists, and other aliens who lack good moral character before they apply get an amnesty for their pre-application period conduct, no matter how bad or extensive that conduct.
The DREAM Act is Not Just for Young People:
Sponsors insist that the point of the DREAM Act is to provide legal status to “kids” and “young people.” However, the DREAM Act is not directed just at minors. Under the “new” DREAM Act, anyone 29-years-old or younger, who illegally entered the United States before the age of 16 and has illegally remained here for 5 years or more will qualify for lawful permanent residence (and eventual citizenship) if they satisfy the easily-met criteria for DREAM Act amnesty. Illegal aliens who are 30-years-old or older can still be granted the DREAM amnesty through “humanitarian” or “family unity” waivers.
The DREAM Act is a Big Amnesty:
It’s estimated there are some 2 million illegal immigrant children in the United States. They are only a portion of the millions of aliens who will likely qualify for the DREAM Act amnesty, because the DREAM Act does not place a cap on the number of people who qualify, provides exceptions to the newly-formed under-30 age limit, and applies retroactively to anyone who first entered before age 16. Furthermore, the recipients of the DREAM Act amnesty will be permitted to petition for their illegal parents and adult relatives once they become citizens.
Leave A Reply